Isolate - Judgment Search Results

Anand Jaiswal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1987MPLJ308

b c varma j 1 the order in this petition shall also govern the disposal of miscellaneous petition no 2944...

The Berhampur Cotton Weavers' Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs. Jagannath

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1987Ori204

orders c mohapatra j 1 a co operative society is the petitioner in this civil revision against an order under...

Mukesh Vs. Deonarayan and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1987MP85

v d gyani j 1 this miscellaneous appeal arises out of order dt 12 2 1986 refusing ad interim injunction...

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Calcutta Hardware Stores and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC614; 1988(1)SCALE256; (1986)2SCC203; [1986]1SCR364; 1986(1)LC702(SC)

..... case is decided and for this reason it is important to analyse a decision and isolate from it the ratio decidendi according to well settled theory of precedents every decision contains .....

inspecting Assistant Vs. Switchgear Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1986)18ITD587(Hyd.)

..... switzerland with the object of increasing its product range in the existing range of isolators and to improve the profitability and for obtaining technical know how manufacturing and other ..... foreign company was to provide the drawings know how and manufacturing methods for manufacturing pantograph isolators for all rated voltages of alpha manufacturing programme especially for 420 kv rated voltage .....

Gopalkrishna Ramchandra Chavan and ors., Etc. Vs. State of Maharastra ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)88BOMLR230; 1987MhLJ665

..... the first place there is the backward that has arisen out of historic and geographic isolation of groups from the mainstnream of civilisation and as a result these groups apear as ..... disabilities and difficulties as before and are obliged and complled to live ina state of isolation and segregation and are theregfore quite powerless and misdrable the underlying is ours prof bhandare .....

G. Pichaimani Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1986(10)ECC148; 1986(2)KarLJ206

..... in the context of grounds of detention and not in isolation if read in isolation the para may not even convey any meaning we will ..... the grounds the order and grounds are not two separate and isolated documents the order is made on the grounds the representation made ..... union of india 1981 1scr640 we have carefully read these observations in isolation and also in the context in which they occur in this .....

G. Pichaimani Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1986(26)ELT24(Kar); ILR1987KAR1069

..... in the context of grounds of detention and not in isolation if read in isolation the para may not even convey any meaning we will ..... the grounds the order and grounds are not two separate and isolated documents the order is made on the grounds the representation made ..... union of india 1981 1scr640 we have carefully read these observations in isolation and also in the context in which they occur in this .....

Moran Vs. Burbine

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the police may constitutionally prevent any communication between a lawyer and an individual held in isolation an important right to legal representation will be lost many cases decided across the country ..... his right to retained or appointed counsel since the state is responsible for establishing the isolated circumstances under which the interrogation takes place and has the only means of making .....

Digvijay Cement Company Limited Vs. Union of India

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1986(10)ECC359; 1987(10)LC7(Gujarat); 1986(25)ELT879(Guj); (1987)1GLR641

..... it was not his contention that sub rule 2 should be read in isolation and dehors the proviso but his submission was that the proviso contemplate ..... rule as enacted by the proviso if sub para i is read in isolation as a separate scheme and situation as suggested by mr patel only ..... it is not as if sub rule 1 of rule 56a stands in isolation once excisable goods are specified under sub rule 1 of rule 56a .....