Irrelevant - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: irrelevant Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 220 results (0.022 seconds)Management, Chitavalsah Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Workmen of Chitavalsah Jut ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-02-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1076; [1968(17)FLR150]; 1968LabIC1283; (1969)ILLJ520SC; [1968]3SCR8
..... profits earned by some of the partners were surrendered to the parent firm would be irrelevant a partner of a firm can certainly secure his capital from any source or surrender ..... this case as the tribunal misconstrued the provisions of the partnership deed and relied upon irrelevant considerations in coming to the conclusion sree meenakshi mills ltd v commissioner of income tax .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVishwanatha Reddy Vs. Konappa Rudrappa Nadgouda and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-13-1968
..... reaching its satisfaction the central government misapprehends the nature of the conditions or proceeds upon irrelevant materials or ignores relevant materials the jurisdiction of the courts to examine the satisfaction is ..... taken into consideration all the relevant circumstances and that its decision is not vitiated by irrelevant or extraneous matters 186 b d nbsp
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.F. Varghese (No. 2) Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-13-1968
Reported in: [1969]72ITR726(Ker)
..... provides no ground to reject accounts filed assessee s failure to include negligible income details irrelevant held rejection of account unjustified the income tax officer rejected the accounts and made a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. A.D. Cotton Mills (P.) Ltd.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-16-1968
Reported in: [1969]72ITR421(Ker)
..... fact that agreement for sale and transfer of movable properties were before 30 06 1957 irrelevant actual sale effected on date of transfer of immovable properties which was on 30 08 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSampat Prakash Vs. the State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-10-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC1118; 1970LabIC873; [1969]2SCR365
..... 437 anticipatory bail conditions that may be imposed enumerated factors to be considered by court irrelevant and unwarranted conditions for release on bail sustainability held harsh onerous and excessive conditions which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTarak Nath Ghosh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-22-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1372; 1968LabIC1514; [1968]3SCR224
..... who heard the matter held that the appellate tribunal had overlooked relevant considerations and allowed irrelevant considerations to prevail and so made the rule absolute a letters patent appeal was preferred .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGorantla Thataiah Vs. Thotakura Venkata Subbaiah and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-19-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1332; [1968]3SCR473
..... relief could be claimed in respect of these businesses changes in respect of them were irrelevant vi by the expression discontinued in sub s 3 is meant complete cessation of business .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Mysore Vs. Gurunath V. Dhakappa
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-23-1968
Reported in: [1969]72ITR192(SC)
..... the discharge of his duty whether he had actually done that or not would be irrelevant for deciding the necessity for sanction 215b d e f the trial and conviction of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRohtas Industries Vs. S.D. Agarwal and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-16-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC707; [1969]39CompCas781(SC); (1969)1SCC325; [1969]3SCR108
..... by misdirecting himself in point of law or c by taking into account some wholly irrelevant or extraneous consideration or d by wholly omitting to take into account a relevant consideration ..... be taken to contemplate an unlimited arbitrary power exercisable for any purpose however capricious or irrelevant regardless of the nature or purpose of the statute fraud and corruption in the commission .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKing Vs. Smith
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
..... father is actually the father of the children is irrelevant it is also irrelevant whether he is legally obligated to support the children ..... to need because the actual financial situation of the family is irrelevant in determining the existence of a substitute father also not ..... there is sin the paramour s wealth or indigency is irrelevant in other words the alabama regulation is aimed at punishing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT