Intervene - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: intervene Page 1 of about 24 results (0.019 seconds)Sri Sita Ram Sugar Mills Ltd., Baitalpur, District Deoria (U.P.) and D ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1966SC1670; (1960)ILLJ558SC
P.B. Gajendragadkar, J. 1. This appeal by special leave arises out of an industrial dispute between the Appellant Sri Sitaram...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Vs. Prince Muffakam Jah and Othersinterveners: Professo ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1995SC227; 1994(2)ARBLR503(SC); [1994]Supp4SCR582
(3) of the Agreement. But, that does not mean the interveners could raise a dispute. If, at all, the dispute could
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Customs (i) , Mumbai-ii Vs. Abdul Hassan Mohamed K ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
fine since re-export was allowed. 2. In this case the intervener M/s.Lombard North Central PLC has also filed an application for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSalvesen Vs. Riddell and Another (Lord Advocate Intervening)
Court: UK Supreme Court
remedy. The Advocate General has not thought it necessary to intervene in these proceedings. The facts 4. Alastair Salvesen, who was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Tamil Nadu Vs. M/S. Pyare Lal Malhotra Etc. M/S. Durga Steel, ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: (1976)5CTR(SC)0278B
without any purpose behind it.8. Learned Counsel appearing for an intervener argued that the chemical composition of iron and steel affords
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Labour Relations Board of Saskatchewan Vs. John East Iron Works Lt ...
Court: Privy Council
Reported in: AIR1949PC129
Lord Simonds: In this appeal, which is brought from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, a question...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRambhau Jairam Dhamange Vs. Vinkur Co-operative Society Ltd. (by Its P ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [1967(14)FLR27]
of 1964 - filed in Bombay have been allowed to intervene. The facts of Special Civil Application No. 161 of 1965
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSantosh Kumar JaIn Vs. the State Union of India (intervener)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1951SC201; 1951CriLJ757; [1951]2SCR303
Patanjali Sastri, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissing a...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Mir Mohammad Ali. Aruna Mills L ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: [1964]53ITR165(SC)
B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, for the intervenor. April 24, 1964. The judgment Of SUBBA RAo and SIKRI
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudhir Chandra Nawn Vs. Wealth-tax Officer, Calcutta, and Others. Inte ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: [1968]69ITR897(SC)
SHAH J. - For the years 1959-60, 1960-61 and 1961-62 the petitioner was assessed to tax under the Wealth-tax Act,...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>