Skip to content


Interrupt - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: interrupt Year: 1938 Page 1 of about 31 results (0.016 seconds)
Jan 11 1938 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Sachindra Nath Moulik Mukhtear

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-11-1938

Reported in: AIR1938Cal783

jack j 1 this is a reference under section 14 legal practitioners act made by the district judge of pabna...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 1938 (PC)

MartIn CashIn and Others Vs. Peter J. Cashin

Court: Privy Council

Decided on: Jan-13-1938

lord maugham this is an appeal from the judgment of the supreme court of newfoundland sir william h horwood c...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 1938 (FN)

Consolidated Edison Co. Vs. Labor Board

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-05-1938

..... legislature of new york has enacted comprehensive and adequate measures to protect against the interruption of petitioners services through labor disputes not only has the state long had ..... federal action to protect interstate commerce or any other interest of the government against interruption or interference liable to result from controversies between these employers and their employees the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 1938 (PC)

Lakhmi Chand and ors. Vs. Bibi Kalsumannisa

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-01-1938

Reported in: AIR1939All82

..... that the period of limitation in respect of his decree was interrupted from 3rd february 1928 until 2nd may 1931 2 before ..... is within time the contention that the period of limitation was interrupted as aforementioned and that the execution application of 28th april 1933 ..... the execution but that order would have had the effect of interrupting the period of limitation 8 learned counsel for the decree .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 1938 (FN)

Zerbst Vs. Kidwell

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-16-1938

..... were no longer in custody under the first sentences service of the first sentences was interrupted and suspended and was not resumed before completion of service of the second sentences and ..... and imprisoned not only was his parole violated but service of his original sentence was interrupted and suspended thereafter his imprisonment was attributable to his second sentence only and his rights .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 17 1938 (FN)

Wright Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-17-1938

..... on a matter of the highest public importance refusing to be interrupted on the last day of the period in which return may ..... of the house and its appropriate officers continue to function without interruption the bill is properly safeguarded for a very limited time and ..... house during the session of congress does not constitute such an interruption of the session of the house as to give rise to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 1938 (PC)

In Re: Poulose Mathen and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-07-1938

Reported in: AIR1939Mad263; (1939)2MLJ169

..... strangulated piles to the general hospital it is clear therefore that the learned magistrate was interrupted by our learned brother s stay order while he was considering the desirability or otherwise ..... over but we have already pointed out that the learned magistrate when his proceedings were interrupted by the service upon him of our learned brother s stay order was considering an .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1938 (FN)

Myers Vs. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-31-1938

..... employees that operation of plant will be disrupted by labor disturbances that employment will be interrupted and that the damage to the employees will be irreparable p 303 u s 53 ..... employees that operation of plant will be disrupted by labor disturbances that employment will be interrupted and that the damage to the employees will be irreparable these additional allegations furnish no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 1938 (FN)

Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. Vs. Labor Board

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-28-1938

..... c 13 but also to the protection of that interstate commerce from burdens obstructions and interruptions whatever may be their source second employers liability cases 223 u s 1 223 u .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 1938 (FN)

Shannahan Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-04-1938

..... fail to select him 3 if arbitration is refused and the dispute threatens substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive any section of the country of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //