Interrupt - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interrupt Year: 1938 Page 1 of about 31 results (0.016 seconds)Emperor Vs. Sachindra Nath Moulik Mukhtear
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-11-1938
Reported in: AIR1938Cal783
jack j 1 this is a reference under section 14 legal practitioners act made by the district judge of pabna...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMartIn CashIn and Others Vs. Peter J. Cashin
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Jan-13-1938
lord maugham this is an appeal from the judgment of the supreme court of newfoundland sir william h horwood c...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTConsolidated Edison Co. Vs. Labor Board
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-05-1938
..... legislature of new york has enacted comprehensive and adequate measures to protect against the interruption of petitioners services through labor disputes not only has the state long had ..... federal action to protect interstate commerce or any other interest of the government against interruption or interference liable to result from controversies between these employers and their employees the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLakhmi Chand and ors. Vs. Bibi Kalsumannisa
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-01-1938
Reported in: AIR1939All82
..... that the period of limitation in respect of his decree was interrupted from 3rd february 1928 until 2nd may 1931 2 before ..... is within time the contention that the period of limitation was interrupted as aforementioned and that the execution application of 28th april 1933 ..... the execution but that order would have had the effect of interrupting the period of limitation 8 learned counsel for the decree .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZerbst Vs. Kidwell
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-16-1938
..... were no longer in custody under the first sentences service of the first sentences was interrupted and suspended and was not resumed before completion of service of the second sentences and ..... and imprisoned not only was his parole violated but service of his original sentence was interrupted and suspended thereafter his imprisonment was attributable to his second sentence only and his rights .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWright Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-17-1938
..... on a matter of the highest public importance refusing to be interrupted on the last day of the period in which return may ..... of the house and its appropriate officers continue to function without interruption the bill is properly safeguarded for a very limited time and ..... house during the session of congress does not constitute such an interruption of the session of the house as to give rise to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Poulose Mathen and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-1938
Reported in: AIR1939Mad263; (1939)2MLJ169
..... strangulated piles to the general hospital it is clear therefore that the learned magistrate was interrupted by our learned brother s stay order while he was considering the desirability or otherwise ..... over but we have already pointed out that the learned magistrate when his proceedings were interrupted by the service upon him of our learned brother s stay order was considering an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMyers Vs. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-31-1938
..... employees that operation of plant will be disrupted by labor disturbances that employment will be interrupted and that the damage to the employees will be irreparable p 303 u s 53 ..... employees that operation of plant will be disrupted by labor disturbances that employment will be interrupted and that the damage to the employees will be irreparable these additional allegations furnish no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSanta Cruz Fruit Packing Co. Vs. Labor Board
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-28-1938
..... c 13 but also to the protection of that interstate commerce from burdens obstructions and interruptions whatever may be their source second employers liability cases 223 u s 1 223 u .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShannahan Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-04-1938
..... fail to select him 3 if arbitration is refused and the dispute threatens substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive any section of the country of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial