Interpretive - Judgment Search Results

Samatha Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC3297; JT1997(6)SC449; 1997(4)SCALE746; (1997)8SCC191; [1997]Supp2SCR305

..... and prevents exploitation of the tribals by non tribals in any form this purposive interpretation would ensure distributive justice among the tribals in this behalf and elongates the ..... was therefore held that it nbsp therefore appears to be well established that while interpreting or examining the constitutional nbsp validity of legislative administrative action the touchstone of directive .....

Agostini Vs. Felton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rationale that public employees will not be presumed to inculcate religion to signlanguage interpreters indeed even the zobrest dissenters acknowledged the shift zobrest effected in our establishment ..... although title i instruction is provided to several students at once whereas an interpreter provides translation to a single student this distinction is not constitutionally significant moreover .....

City of Boerne Vs. Flores

Court: US Supreme Court

..... separation of powers between congress and the judiciary depriving congress of any power to interpret and elaborate on its meaning by conferring self executing substantive rights against the states ..... self executing prohibitions on governmental action and this court has had primary authority to interpret those prohibitions the bingham draft some thought departed from that tradition by vesting in .....

Almendarez-torres Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... matter is a typical sentencing factor and the lower courts have almost uniformly interpreted statutes that authorize higher sentences for recidivists as setting forth sentencing factors not ..... with prior convictions perhaps reflecting this fact the lower courts have almost uniformly interpreted statutes that authorize higher sentences for recidivists as setting forth sentencing factors not .....

Commissioner Vs. Estate of Hubert

Court: US Supreme Court

..... b 4 b plainly is this court has consistently deferred to the treasury department s interpretive regulations so long as they implement the congressional mandate in some reasonable manner national muffler ..... some such way her approach might prove reasonable and this court will defer to longstanding interpretations of the code and treasury regulations see supra at 138 139 that reasonably implement the .....

Regions Hospital Vs. Shalala

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in place for determining the reasonable 1984 gme costs indeed under the secretary s interpretation the words recognized as become not only superfluous but positively misleading since without them ..... that date under the old authority in short given the evaluation deadline the secretary s interpretation makes no sense most judicial constructions of statutes solve textual problems today s construction .....

Reno Vs. Bossier Parish School Bd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... independence of the district court preclearance route a nullity moreover given our own longstanding interpretation of 5 see ante at 483 deference to the particular preclearance regulation addressed in ..... history abrogates con 9 the postenactment legislative record also supports the attorney general s interpretation of 5 in 1985 the attorney general first proposed regulations requiring a denial of .....

United States Vs. Labonte

Court: US Supreme Court

..... whom justice stevens and justice ginsburg join dissenting the united states sentencing commission has interpreted three statutory words the words maximum term authorized to mean maximum term of ..... times may exercise that power in 779 different ways the commission concluded that its interpretation avoids unwarranted disparity associated with variations in the exercise of prosecut orial discretion .....

Set Telecommunications Private Vs. Collector of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(161)ELT1105TriDel

..... notification no 132 87 cus the collector has observed that the interpretative rule 2 a is applied only for the purpose of classification ..... manufacturing programme duly authorised by dgtd therefore he has held that interpretative rule 2 a is not applicable he has further observed that ..... he has rejected the applicability of rule 2 a of the interpretative rules in the present case on this premise he has .....

Grasim Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(103)ELT515TriDel

..... notes and the harmonised coding system and also to the incorporation of the general interpretative rules in fact it constitutes an international economic language and code for identifying and ..... harmonised system without addition or modification and shall apply the general rules for the interpretation and follow the numerical sequence of the harmonised system the developing countries were allowed .....