Interlocking Directorate - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interlocking directorate Page 1 of about 137 results (0.018 seconds)Bankamerica Corp. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
..... with which it competes the language of the statute is unambiguous in prohibiting interlocking directorates between two or more corporations other than banks the most natural reading of ..... statements by congressmen page 462 u s 147 and president wilson denouncing interlocking directorates in general and interlocks between competitors in the banking industry in particular however all of these .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. W. T. Grant Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
..... individual and six corporations from violating 8 through the holding by the individual of interlocking directorates in three pairs of competing corporations thereafter the individual resigned his directorship in one ..... to show an abuse of discretion in this case are these hancock s three interlocking directorates viewed as three distinct violations his failure to terminate them until after suit was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMontana-dakota Utilities Co. Vs. Pub. Serv. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
..... from the intercorporate relationship the act vests in the commission power to authorize an interlocking directorate which otherwise is prohibited upon due showing that neither public nor private interests ..... can afford no adequate remedy to montana dakota vacating its acquiescence in the interlocking directorate or in the schedules filed by northwestern might prevent northwestern from asserting the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited State Vs. Boston and Maine R.
Court: US Supreme Court
..... it by having a supply company and even though they have discarded the form of interlocking directors if there be the interest of the railroad or the common carrier in the supply ..... it is pointed out that the railroad scandals of that age were not limited to interlocking directorates and multiple shareholding but that suppliers of railroad materials had made substantial gifts to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDenver and Rio Grande Western R. Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
..... anything inconsistent with its view of 20a there the commission was requested to approve an interlocking directorate which is forbidden unless authorized by the commission pursuant to 20a 12 of the ..... the commission then determined under its established standards for judging the acceptability of an interlocking directorate id at 18 that such an authorization would be improper but observed that i .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPan American World Airways Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
..... than to attempt to define the numerous unfair practices such as local price cutting interlocking directorates and holding companies intended to restrain substantial competition s rep no 597 63d ..... board has issued orders of approval under 408 409 and 412 consolidations and mergers interlocking directorates and cooperative working arrangements the existence of this express and specific provision for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBlau Vs. Lehman
Court: US Supreme Court
..... significance where there is none footnote 2 5 the proper approach to the problem of interlocking directorates through the agency of an investment banking house was expressed by judge fahy in lehman ..... hertz is a director of consolidated vultee aircraft corporation all the companies referred to are in the aeronautic field and so must have board approval of the kind of interlocking relationships which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
..... resulted in noncompetitive preferences were intended to be dealt with exclusively by the provision forbidding interlocking directorates 8 of the clayton act if not covered by the specific prohibitions of certain price ..... 2734 81st cong 1st and 2d sess 37 report of the federal trade commission on interlocking directorates h r doc no 652 81st cong 2d sess 1 footnote 2 10 in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSec Vs. Medical Committee for Human Rights
Court: US Supreme Court
..... in grant supra an antitrust violation was charged because of an interlocking directorate in response to the suits the interlocking directors resigned page 404 u s 409 and defendant companies represented to ..... the court their intention not to revive the interlock we disposed of this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNantahala P. and L. Vs. Thornburg
Court: US Supreme Court
..... ferc s predecessor the federal power commission fpc in montana dakota two power companies with interlocking directorates and joint corporate officers each received some of the other s power at rates that ..... the blame for these allegedly fraudulent and unlawful rates at the door of the previously interlocking management and brought suit in federal court this court dismissed the claim emphasizing that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial