Interfering - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interfering Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 715 results (0.037 seconds)R.G. Janthakal Vs. Bharat Parikh and Co.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-23-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Kant208; 1981(1)KarLJ365
..... and that the defendant should be restrained by an injunction from interfering with the peaceful possession and mining operations of the plaint ..... to whether the defendant at any time had trespassed or interfered with the possession in respect of the plaint b schedule ..... observation that in the event of the defendant in any way interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-30-1981
Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365
..... do not include of course a mere busy body who is interfering in things which do not concern him but they do include ..... facts and circumstances obtaining therein the chief justice s order was interfered with in the other case in re the special courts bill ..... is ordered under article 222 the plea that the transfers have interfered with the independence of the judiciary is also denied the allegation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNlrb Vs. Amax Coal Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1981
..... 1 a on the other hand 8 b 1 b bars a union representative from interfering with the employer s collective bargaining agent s performance of his duties in accordance with ..... s national trust funds there is no basis for its claim that the union was interfering with that prerogative of management third the court might conclude that it is permissible for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManagement of Craigmore Estate, Kullakamby Post, Nilgiris Dist. Vs. La ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-1981
Reported in: (1981)IILLJ23Mad
..... the labour court and it found warrant and justification for interfering with the punishment and while ordering reinstatement of the second ..... to have been established beyond doubt but it has not interfered with order of dismissal passed by the petitioner on this ..... taken the relevant factors into consideration for the purpose of interfering with the quantum of punishment considering the nature of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBraham Raj Singh Vs. Smt. Braham Raj Devi and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-1981
Reported in: AIR1982HP57
..... that the findings of fact arrived at by the learned district judge should not be interfered in the second appeal it was further contended that the documentary and the oral evidence ..... the peculiar circumstances of the case the judgment of the learned district judge can be interfered with if it is otherwise not sustainable the school transfer certificate ex db has been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohd. Sabir Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-1981
Reported in: 1981CriLJ1120; 20(1981)DLT345
..... party no 2 for an injunction restraining party no 2 from interfering with the business management and other activities of the society ..... to be the members of the executive body were illegally interfering with the management of the society shri m s rohilla ..... january 1981 granted an ex parte order restraining party no 2 from interfering in the management of the society the application was contested .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Nov-13-1981
..... legislation can impose such a restriction which would have the effect of interfering with the performance of their duties by the legislators any such ..... clause b of section 24 g has the direct effect of interfering with the exercise of the privileges under section 72 1 of ..... ground that they were violative of article 19 1 a as they interfered with a citizen s fundamental right to freedom of speech and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrojendra Nath Biswas Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-30-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Cal220
..... herein were restrained by an interim order of injunc tion from interfering with and or disturbing the possession or damage the fishery ..... appeal and restrained the respondents nos 5 to 21 herein from interfering with the plaintiff s possession of the suit property till the ..... be not applicable in this proceeding there the supreme court had interfered because the judgment as made was illegal and in clear .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMirta Lina Pr. Ltd. Vs. the Finlay Mills Ltd. and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-03-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Cal41
..... still subsisting as also an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with or disturbing their possession he points out that in ..... injunction restraining the defendants from disturbing and or interfering with possession of the plaintiffs in the suit premises and ..... from disturbing or interfering with the plaintiff s enjoyment of all rights agreements .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRahmath Bi and anr. Vs. State Wakf Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Mad202
..... an injunction restraining the tamil nadu state wakf board from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the properties or by ..... suit i ropertie5 and for restraining the wakf board from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the properties by execution ..... which the possession of the petitioners is sought to be interfered with though the petitioners claimed that the decree had been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial