Interferant - Year 2016 - Judgments

Jul 18 2016 (SC)

Board of Control for Cricket Vs. Cricket Aasociation of Bihar and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-18-2016

..... accessibility and transparency prevent conflict of interest situations and eradicate political and commercial interference and abuse and create mechanisms for resolution of disputes within the bcci the ..... posts and tenures voting compliance expenditure and infrastructure lack of professionalism dual posts interference in selection and transparency the committee has after an elaborate discussion under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 2016 (SC)

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-11-2016

..... functions or instrumentalities of the other unless the constitution expressly provides for such interference in ii kesavanada bharathi v state of kerala hereinafter keshvanada bharathi 34 majority ..... depreciation of relevant roads and the collection of the exaction involves no substantial interference with the movement the expression reasonable compensation is convenient but vague the standard .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 13 2016 (SC)

Nabam Rebia and Etc. Etc. Vs. Deputy Speaker and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-13-2016

..... responsibility acceptance of the contention advanced on behalf of the respondents would seriously interfere with the responsibility entrusted to the popular government which operates through the council ..... power no quia timet actions are permissible the only exception for any interlocutory interference being cases of interlocutory disqualifications or suspensions which may have grave immediate and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 21 2016 (SC)

Board of Control for Cricket Vs. Cricket Aasociation of Bihar and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-21-2016

..... the extent of requesting icc to issue a letter that this committee amounts to governmental interference besides making several objectionable statements in the press which undermined both the court and ..... of an organization discharging public functions such as bcci may be seen as governmental interference calling for suspension derecognition of the bcci far from finding fault with presence of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 03 2016 (HC)

State of West Bengal Vs. Pam Developments Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-03-2016

..... given the courts an opportunity to widen their scope of interference with the arbitral awards the only open ended expression which ..... evidence even in a case where the award contains reasons the interference therewith would still be not available within the jurisdiction of ..... further held that the appellate court was not justified to interfere with finding of fact given by the trial court regarding .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 2016 (HC)

Central Railway Caterer's Association and Others Vs. Union of India an ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-08-2016

..... it is demonstrably arbitrary discriminatory malafide or actuated by bias that the courts would interfere the courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender prescribed by the government because it feels ..... or its instrumentalities act reasonably fairly and in public interest in awarding contract here again interference by court is very restrictive since no person can claim a fundamental right to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 16 2016 (HC)

M/s. Add Lounge Services Private Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-16-2016

..... personnel and general public in all matters related to safeguarding against acts of unlawful interference with civil aviation and to establish an organization and develop and implement regulations ..... practices and procedures to safeguard civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference taking into account safety regularity and efficiency of the flights chapter i of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 2016 (HC)

Phantom Films Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Central Board of Film Certific ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-13-2016

..... is coloured by considerations not wholly relevant and germane then as well this court must interfere in writ jurisdiction the writ jurisdiction is also available in the event the decision is ..... allegation would jeopardize the already delicate foreign relationship mr sethna therefore would submit that no interference is required in this court s writ jurisdiction with the order of the board and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 2016 (HC)

VSM Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Bharat Diamond Bourse

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-16-2016

..... foundation for judicial control of private regulatory power is however still unclear can a court interfere on a grounds of public policy b because the famed judicial conscience finds itself ..... do have jurisdictional control their jurisdiction stems from broad public policy considerations when courts do interfere in such cases they seek to impose fairness reasonableness and rationality in private law .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 06 2016 (HC)

Shaikh Zahid Mukhtar and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Other ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: May-06-2016

..... any way detract from the undisputable position that the direct or tangible restrictions on and interference by the state on personal autonomy personal liberty which includes choice of food would necessarily ..... and mutually exclusive rights each freedom has different dimensions and merely because the limits of interference with one freedom are satisfied the law is not freed from the necessity to meet .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Interferant - Judgment Search Results