Intercept - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: intercept Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.012 seconds)Simon Lindsay Kayrouz Vs. the Queen
Court: New Zealand Court of Appeal
Decided on: Apr-14-2014
..... appellant was a participant in the conspiracy it followed that hearsay statements in the intercepted communications were inadmissible an additional argument advanced is that the statements in question were ..... not reasonable evidence of the appellants membership of the conspiracy without reference to the intercepted communications that took place in the appellants absence 25 we disagree for a number .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the Case OflagutIn and Others Vs. Russia
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
..... activities oelig the aims of operational search activities are ldquo to detect prevent intercept and investigate criminal offences and search for and identify those responsible for ..... operational search activities involving the monitoring of postal telegraphic and other communications telephone interception through telecommunications companies or the collection of data from technical channels of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFrank Kingsley Ugochukwu and Anr. Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intellige ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
..... usman 4 according to pw 9 the two african nationals were intercepted by the raiding party they disclosed their names as frank ..... been shown to have been caused to the appellants fourthly the interception was at a railway station a public place and therefore ..... it is submitted by mr satish aggarwala that the place of interception was established by the panchnama signed by the appellants their statements .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnkur Chawla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
..... revealed that the special unit cbi kolkata sought permission from the competent authority for intercepting conversations messages on mobile no 9830868717 9433292201 and 9433469267 of accused manoj kumar ..... prosecution of co accused r vasudevan accordingly it is submitted that the aforesaid intercepted conversation demolishes the prosecution case of petitioner vikas shukla meeting coaccused on 23rd .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFrank Kingsley Ugochukwu and Anr. Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intellige ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
..... usman 4 according to pw 9 the two african nationals were intercepted by the raiding party they disclosed their names as frank ..... been shown to have been caused to the appellants fourthly the interception was at a railway station a public place and therefore ..... it is submitted by mr satish aggarwala that the place of interception was established by the panchnama signed by the appellants their statements .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVikas Shukla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
..... revealed that the special unit cbi kolkata sought permission from the competent authority for intercepting conversations messages on mobile no 9830868717 9433292201 and 9433469267 of accused manoj kumar ..... prosecution of co accused r vasudevan accordingly it is submitted that the aforesaid intercepted conversation demolishes the prosecution case of petitioner vikas shukla meeting coaccused on 23rd .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnkur Chawla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
..... revealed that the special unit cbi kolkata sought permission from the competent authority for intercepting conversations messages on mobile no 9830868717 9433292201 and 9433469267 of accused manoj kumar ..... prosecution of co accused r vasudevan accordingly it is submitted that the aforesaid intercepted conversation demolishes the prosecution case of petitioner vikas shukla meeting coaccused on 23rd .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnkur Chawla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
..... revealed that the special unit cbi kolkata sought permission from the competent authority for intercepting conversations messages on mobile no 9830868717 9433292201 and 9433469267 of accused manoj kumar ..... prosecution of co accused r vasudevan accordingly it is submitted that the aforesaid intercepted conversation demolishes the prosecution case of petitioner vikas shukla meeting coaccused on 23rd .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVikas Shukla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
..... revealed that the special unit cbi kolkata sought permission from the competent authority for intercepting conversations messages on mobile no 9830868717 9433292201 and 9433469267 of accused manoj kumar ..... prosecution of co accused r vasudevan accordingly it is submitted that the aforesaid intercepted conversation demolishes the prosecution case of petitioner vikas shukla meeting coaccused on 23rd .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVikas Shukla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
..... revealed that the special unit cbi kolkata sought permission from the competent authority for intercepting conversations messages on mobile no 9830868717 9433292201 and 9433469267 of accused manoj kumar ..... prosecution of co accused r vasudevan accordingly it is submitted that the aforesaid intercepted conversation demolishes the prosecution case of petitioner vikas shukla meeting coaccused on 23rd .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial