Interact - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interact Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 5,475 results (0.067 seconds)Marigowda and Another Vs. State by Doddaballapura Rural Police
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-03-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALT(Cri)518; 1998CriLJ1864; 1998(3)KarLJ39
order1 the petitioners face grave charges for the offences under sections 143 147 148 149 446 427 506 307 324...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVeerabhadranna Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalo ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-04-1998
Reported in: ILR2001KAR2350; 1999(2)KarLJ517
order1 the petitioner was working as divisional controller in bijapur division of karnataka state road transport corporation he invited applications...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubhash Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-21-1998
Reported in: AIR1999SC1463; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)433; 1999CriLJ594; JT1998(5)SC217; 1998(4)SCALE307
ordernanavati j 1 the appellant is challenging his conviction under section 25 of the arms act read with section 5...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRanganathan and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-12-1998
Reported in: AIR1999SC2860; (1998)8SCC201
order1 the writ petitions relate to the riots that took place in karnataka in december 1991 consequent upon a state...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhuman Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-08-1998
Reported in: I(1999)DMC296
..... one of the basic characteristics of these human relationship is mutuality which involves appropriate interaction by both the parties to a relationship these relationships necessarily involve mutual trust ..... human relationship are necessarily limited in number and in respect of the degree of interaction and therefore before entering into these relationships people carefully consider whether the other .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhuman Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-08-1998
Reported in: 1998CriLJ1670; 1998(2)WLC233
..... one of the basic characteristics of these human relationships is mutually which involves appropriate interaction by both the parties to a relation ship these relation ships necessarily involve mutual ..... human relationships are necessarily limited in number and in respect of the degree of interaction and therefore before entering into these relation ships people carefully consider whether the other .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Tribol Engineering Private Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-12-1998
Reported in: 1998(3)CTC385
..... respondent no 2 is biased it is further contended that the interaction between the attorneys of respondent no l and respondent no 2 ..... when the respondent no 2 sitting in the cabin of law officer interacting with the law officer and despite the objections continuing in the ..... in not disclosing the same to the party coupled with his interaction with the law officer mr dhandapani in the law officer s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTiec School of Art and Fashion Vs. Mr. Gursharan Goyal and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-1998
Reported in: 72(1998)DLT833
..... curriculum in conducting various fashion shows with dresses designed by its own students saf also interacts with eminent fashion personalities and conducts workshops and seminars shows and other ..... interactive programmes organized by it and getting the students of the said institution absorbed in their .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalifornia Vs. Deep Sea Research, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-22-1998
..... involving the adjudication of various claims to a historic shipwreck requires us to address the interaction between the eleventh amendment and the in rem admiralty jurisdiction of the federal courts respondent ..... s 436 1900 the court has not always charted a clear path in explaining the interaction between the eleventh amendment and the federal courts in rem admiralty jurisdiction early cases .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPilli Bal Raj and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-1998
Reported in: 1998(3)ALT34
..... kolanur the government of andhra pradesh the first respondent herein after a serious dialogue and interaction with the office bearers of the andhra pradesh fishermen co operative societies rights protection ..... was received by the 2nd respondent the 2nd respondent had again a dialogue and interaction with the general secretary of a p fishermen cooperative societies rights protection committee apart .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial