Intention - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. United States Gypsum Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... fact is determined to violate the statute because of anticompetitive effects without inquiring into the intent with which it was undertaken holds out the distinct possibility of overdeterrence salutary and ..... odds with statutory proscriptions but instead simply to regulate business practices regardless of the intent with which they were undertaken while in certain cases we have imputed a regulatory .....

Elkins Vs. Moreno

Court: US Supreme Court

..... such a visa holder is incapable of demonstrating an essential element of domicile the intent to live permanently or indefinitely in maryland after unsuccessful appeals through university channels ..... to allow nonrestricted nonimmigrant aliens to adopt the united states as their domicile congress intent is confirmed by the regulations of the immigration and naturalization service which provide .....

Tennessee Valley Auth. Vs. Hill

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as within the intendment of the act as indicated above this view of legislative intent at the time of enactment is abundantly confirmed by the subsequent congressional actions and ..... important on behalf of any living species however unimportant without a clear declaration of that intention the more rational interpretation is consistent with representative dingell s obvious thinking the act .....

Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. B.P. (India) Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1979]116ITR440(Cal)

..... section 6 would be applicable in such cases also unless the new legislation manifests an intention incompatible with or contrary to the provisions of the section such incompatibility would have to ..... of the general clauses act therefore will be applicable unless the new legislation manifests an intention incompatible with or contrary to the provisions of the section such incompatibility would have to .....

Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... upon racial minorities they constitute a statutory violation even in the absence of discriminatory intent unless the employer is able to demonstrate that the requirements are sufficiently related ..... racial discrimination such legislation has been sustained even without a requirement of findings of intentional racial discrimination by those required or authorized to accord preferential treatment or a .....

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... own territories parliament may pass legislation controlling the activities of the citizens abroad an intention to have extra territorial operation should be expressed or necessarily implied from the language ..... territory of india has not been discussed far from article 19 1 expressing any intention expressly or impliedly of extra territorial operation the context would indicate that its application .....

Morcha Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC80; 1978CriLJ1710; (1979)1SCC161; [1979]1SCR744

..... and has nothing to do with the question of intention in considering whether the intention was to inflict the injury found to have been ..... proceeds on broad lines as for example whether there was an intention to strike at a vital or a dangerous spot and whether ..... objective investigations thirdly it must be proved that there was an intention to inflict that particular bodily injury that is to say that .....

E.V. Ganapathi Iyer and anr. Vs. V. Venugopal (Died) and Five ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1980)1MLJ411

..... or in vernacular the fundamental rule is to ascertain the intention from the words used the surrounding circumstances are to be ..... from the written instrument the court will give effect to that intention notwithstanding ambiguities in the words used or defects in the ..... restriction in their intendment by the parties having shown their intention expressly or by necessary implication to give it such a .....

Lockett Vs. Ohio

Court: US Supreme Court

..... u s 628 transforms the culpability of those defendants actions applying a requirement of actual intent to kill to defendants not immediately involved in the physical act causing death moreover would ..... run aground on intricate definitional problems attending a felony murder what intention may a state attribute to a robbery participant who sits in the getaway car knows .....

Procunier Vs. Navarette

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mail would violate his federal constitutional rights or they took the action with the malicious intention to cause a deprivation of constitutional rights or other injury to respondent wood v ..... overruled under the standard authorizing liability where the defendant state official has acted with malicious intention to deprive the plaintiff of a constitutional right or to cause him other injury since .....