Intelligence - Sortby Recent - Year 2014 - Judgments

Dec 30 2014 (HC)

S.Timma Vs. The State of andhra Pradesh, Revenue (E

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-30-2014

..... under section 163 results in discrimination between identically situated classes without there being any intelligible differentia he further contends that the vested right of tenure under section 17 of ..... targeted as a single class without there being any reasonable classification based on any intelligible differentia and without a rational basis or object the provision therefore falls foul of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2014 (HC)

S.Timma Vs. The State of andhra Pradesh, Revenue (E

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-30-2014

..... under section 163 results in discrimination between identically situated classes without there being any intelligible differentia he further contends that the vested right of tenure under section 17 of ..... targeted as a single class without there being any reasonable classification based on any intelligible differentia and without a rational basis or object the provision therefore falls foul of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 24 2014 (HC)

Amit Mukhopadhyay Vs. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-24-2014

..... the regulations supra are highly unfair unjust unreasonable arbitrary discriminatory whimsical and fanciful devoid of intelligible differentia having reasonable nexus with the underlying object vi that over a period of time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 24 2014 (HC)

Amit Mukhopadhyay Vs. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-24-2014

..... the regulations supra are highly unfair unjust unreasonable arbitrary discriminatory whimsical and fanciful devoid of intelligible differentia having reasonable nexus with the underlying object vi that over a period of time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 24 2014 (HC)