Court : Karnataka
1/137 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2018PRESENT THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HONBLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA I.T.A.No.155/2016 C/W I.T.A.No.458/2013, I.T.A.No.467/2015 I.T.A.No.173/2017, I.T.A.No.172/2017 I.T.A.No.155/2016 Between:1. The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax C.R. Building, Queens Road Bangalore-560001.2. The Income Tax Officer Ward-4(3), Bangalore. Appellants (By Mr. E.R. Indrakumar, Sr. Counsel for Mr. E.I. Sanmathi, Advocate) And: M/s. Chamundi Winery and Distillery 1313, 9th Cross, 27th Main, 1st Phase J.P. Nagar, Bangalore-560 078 PAN; AAEFC5505C. (By Mr. A. Shankar & Mr. M. Lava, Advocates) **** Respondent Date of Judgment 25-09-2018 I.T.A.No.155/2016 and connected matters The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. Vs. M/s. Chamundi Winery and Distillery 2/137 This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, praying to:1. Decide the question of law and/or such other questions of law as may be fo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
--"R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25h DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.3806 OF2019[LAC].BETWEEN : THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, VISHWESHWARAIAH TOWERS, 3RD FLOOR, PODIUM BLOCK, BENGALURU560001.... APPELLANT (BY SRI VASANT FERNANDES, HCGP) AND: M/S. S.V. GLOBAL MILL LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT, NO.106, ARMENIAN STREET, CHENNAI, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY & MANAGER, MR.K.JOHNSON.... RESPONDENT (BY SRI SAJAN POOVAYYA AND DR.ADITYA SONDHI, SENIOR ADVOCATES FOR SRI SHIRISH KRISHNA & SMT. MONICA PATIL, ADVOCATES) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION541) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED2910/2018 PASSED IN LAC No.33 OF2017ON --"THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 3195/2012 & I.A. NOS. 4433/2013, 12308/2013 & 16689/2013 Judgment Reserved on:22. d December, 2016 Judgment Pronounced on:28. h June, 2017 Vidur Impex And Traders Pvt Ltd and Ors. ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.Manoj, Mr.M.T. Reddy and Ms.Aparna Sinha, Advs. versus Pradeep Kumar Khanna and Ors. ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Yakesh Anand, Ms.Sonam Anand and Mr.Akshay Kapoor, Advs. for defendants no.1 (i) to (iii)/Khanna. Mr.Chetan Sharma and Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advs. with Mr.Mandeep Singh Vinaik Adv. for defendant no.2/Tosh. Mr.C. Mukund and Mr.Vivek Anandh, Advs. for defendant no.4/Bhagwati CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.I.A. Nos. 4433/2013 and 12308/2013 (both under S.151 of the Code by defendant No.2 & defendant No.1(i) to (iii) respectively) 1. Both these applications have been filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (briefly the Code) seeking dismissal of the pre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu
Reported in : (2000)118STC77Tribunal
1. This hatch of cases comprising of tax appeals, tax revisions cases, transfer petitions (writ petitions transferred from Madras High Court), original petitions filed directly before this Special Tribunal, raise an interesting question relating to the distinction between an inter-State sale and a local sale. There are decided cases right from 1949, but we are still searching for a proper test to decide the issue.Rightly so, because the facts of each case have to be looked into and there is some difference somewhere on facts, warranting a re-appraisal of all the cases once over again to find out whether the cardinal principles adumbrated in Section 3(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the CST Act") are present in these cases. In all the cases, the modus operandi is the same and only one argument was advanced on behalf of all the assessees by Mr. C.Natarajan, the doyen of the tax Bar.2. We will First set out the minimum facts of all the cases to justify ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION1CIVIL APPEAL No.3518 OF2007All Kerala Online Lottery Dealers Association .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Kerala & Ors. .... Respondent(s) WITH2CIVIL APPEAL No.3519 OF20073 WITH4CIVIL APPEAL No.3520 OF20075 6 WITH7WRIT PETITION (C) No.641 OF20078 AND9WRIT PETITION (C) No.233 OF201010 JUDGMENT R.K. Agrawal, J.Civil Appeal Nos. 3518-35201) These appeals are directed against the common final judgment and order dated 23.05.2006 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Appeal Nos. 2011, 2012 and 2235 of 2005 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants herein against the judgment and order dated 27.07.2005 passed by learned single Judge of the High Court in Writ Petition (C) Nos. 14495, 16063 and 19582 of 2005.2) Brief facts: (a) The State of Kerala, by notification dated 13.01.2005, issued in exercise of the power conferred by Section 5 of the Lotteries (Regul...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 05.07.2013 Judgment delivered on:11. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5812/2011 TASKINUDDIN & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. M. Sufian Siddiqui, Rakesh Bhugra, M. Tabishzia, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. G.S. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioners for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to pay the petitioners suitable amount of compensation with interest, for loss of lives and injuries suffered in a tragic fire incident in a factory/ business premises of respondent No.2.2. An unfortunate fire incident took place on 25.01.2011 in the premises of M/s Amazing Creation Garment Export Factory at Tughlakabad area of South Delhi, w...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.M.A.Nos.856 of 2003 and Batch 24.04.2013 N.Sree Ramulu and others. B.Lakshmi Narayana (died) and others HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the Appellants : Sri N.Subba Rao and others. Counsel for the respondents: Sri T.Sree Ramulu and others ?Cases referred:1. AIR 197.S.C2. 2007 (4) ALT 60.(D.B.2001. (1) ALD 42.4 2001 (1) ALD 43.5 2002 ACJ 139.6 2000 (1) ALD 55.7 1995 (3) ALD 110.8 APLJ 199 (29. 1997 ACJ 114.10 1996 ACJ 125.112004 (6) ALD 53.121995 (1) ALD 20.(22001. (3) ALD 17.14 2008 (3) ALD 65.(DB) 15 (2008) 8 S.C.C 51.16 2006 (4) ALD 39.11. SCC 34.18 (2010) 13 S.C.C19. (2010) 10 S.C.C20. (2010) 10 S.C.C21. (2008) 9 S.C.C22. (2007) 2 SCC 34.23 C.M.A.No.1256 o24. (2009) 6 SCC 28.25 (2012) 2 SCC 267.C.M.A.Nos.856, 1210 & 2274 of 2001, 335, 550, 1685, 2380 & 3406 of 2002 & 2197 of 2003 COMMON JUDGMENT: Heard Sri N.Subba Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners in C.M.A.Nos.1210 of 2001, 335 of 2002, 550 of 2002, 1685 o2274. of 2001, 3406 of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) D.No.16039 OF 201.Devender Pal Singh Bhullar Petitioner versus State of N.C.T. of Delhi ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.146 OF 201.AND WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.86 OF 201.JUDGMENT G. S. SINGHVI, J.1. Human life is perhaps the most precious gift of the nature, which many describe as the Almighty. This is the reason why it is argued that if you cannot give life, you do not have the right to take it. Many believe that capital punishment should not be imposed irrespective of the nature and magnitude of the crime. Others think that death penalty operates as a strong deterrent against heinous crimes and there is nothing wrong in legislative prescription of the same as one of the punishments. The debate on this issue became more intense in the second part of the 20th century and those belonging to the first school of thought succeeded in convincing the governments of about 140 cou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5329 OF2002Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. Appellant Versus State of Tamil Nadu & Another Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.1352 OF2005CIVIL APPEAL No.5332 OF2002CIVIL APPEAL No.5333 OF2002CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5335- 5336 OF2002JUDGMENT Chelameswar, J.1. By a common judgment dated 4th March, 2002, the High Court of Madras dismissed a batch of writ appeals and some connected writ petitions. Aggrieved by the said judgment, four companies, which are carrying on the business of manufacture and sale of cement in the State of Tamil Nadu, carried the matter to this Court in these appeals.2. The Government of Tamil Nadu in the Industries Department issued a letter No.628 dated 10.5.1982 addressed to the Collectors of the various districts. The relevant part of the letter reads I am directed to state that the rates of Royalty and dead rent in respect of leases over patta lands have been fixed at 50% (half rate) as...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: January 10, 2014 CS(OS) 2252/2011 & I.A. No.14617/2011, I.A. No.18553/2011, I.A. No.20143/2011, I.A. No.20144/2011, I.A. No.20167/2011, I.A. No.20762/2011, I.A. No.448/2012 and I.A. No.15808/2012 INSTITUTE FOR INNER STUDIES & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Amit Chadha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Karan Mehra, Mr. Lalit Jhunjhunwala, Ms. Bahaar Dhawan & Ms. Chandni Goel, Advs. versus CHARLOTTE ANDERSON & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. B.B. Sawhney, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dipak Kumar Jena, Adv. & Ms. Minakshi Jena Ghosh, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Viplav Sharma, Adv. for D-2. Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, Adv. for D-3. Mr. Ajit Pudussery, Adv. with Mr. Dinesh Khurana, Adv. for D-11. Mr. Raghav Awasthi, Adv. for D-14. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs, (ten in numbers) have filed the present suit seeking declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction alongwith...
Tag this Judgment!