Court : Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd., (NHPC), a generating company owned and controlled by the Central Government, for approval of tariff in respect of Loktak Hydroelectric Project (3 x 35 MW) (hereinafter referred to as "the generating station") in the State of Manipur for the period from 1.4.2004 to 31.3.2009 based on the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2004, (hereinafter referred to as "the 2004 regulations") 3. The revised investment approval for the generating station was accorded by the Central Government in Ministry of Power vide letter dated 23.1.1984 at a cost of Rs. 12672 lakh, including IDC of Rs. 1976 lakh.4. The tariff for the generating station for the period ending 31.3.2004 was approved by the Commission vide its order dated 1.11.2002 in Petition No. 59/2001 based on capital cost of Rs. 13620.00 lakh as on 31.3.2001. Subsequently, by a separate order date...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO5542 OF2016[Arising out of SLP [C]. No.12398/2014]. Sai Bhaskar Iron Ltd. Appellant(s) Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors. Respondents WITH CA Nos.5543-5544 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. Nos. 14638-14639/2014 CA No.5545 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. No.15205/2014 CA Nos. 5546-5571 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. Nos. 15245-15270/2014 CA Nos. 5572-5575 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. Nos. 15348-15351/2014 CA Nos. 5576-5578 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. Nos. 15356-15358/2014 CA Nos. 5579-5583 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. Nos. 15360-15364/2014 CA Nos. 5584-5586 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. Nos. 15389-15391/2014 CA No.5587 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. No.15603/2014 CA No.5588 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. No.15845/2014 CA Nos. 5589-5598 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. Nos. 15878-15887/2014 CA No.5599 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. No.15891/2014 CA Nos. 5600-5601 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. Nos. 15938-15939/2014 CA No.5602 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. No.15940/2014 CA Nos. 5603-5611 of 2016 @ SLP [C]. Nos. 15985-15993/2014 CA No.561...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3849 OF2017|FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP LTD. |..APPELLANT(S) | | | | | | | |VERSUS | | | | | |COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, | | |INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3, | | |DELHI & ANR. |..RESPONDENT(S) | W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.3850 OF2017A N D CIVIL APPEAL No.3851 OF2017JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.INTRODUCTION These appeals are filed by Formula One World Championship Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'FOWC'), Jaypee Sports International Limited (for short, 'Jaypee') and Union of India (hereinafter referred to as the 'Revenue'). In all these appeals, challenge is laid to the judgment dated November 30, 2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi whereby three writ petitions preferred by FOWC, Jaypee and Revenue have been decided. The matter originated from filing of applications by FOWC and Jaypee before the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR). FOWC had entered into a 'Race Promotion Contract' (RPC) dated September 13, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : House of Lords
LORD PHILLIPS OF WORTH MATRAVERS My Lords, 1. I have had the benefit of reading in draft the opinions of my noble and learned friends Lord Mance and Lord Collins of Mapesbury. I agree with their conclusion that this appeal should be allowed and the reasons that each gives for that conclusion, for those reasons are in harmony. I propose to explain shortly why I agree with their reasoning. 2. Essentially the result of this appeal is dictated by the agreed fact that the reinsurance contract that is the subject of the appeal is governed by English law and by the well established principle, not challenged in this case, that under English law a contract of reinsurance in relation to property is a contract under which the reinsurers insure the property that is the subject of the primary insurance; it is not simply a contract under which the reinsurers agree to indemnify the insurers in relation to any liability that they may incur under the primary insurance - British Dominions General Insur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SUIT No.3 OF2006State of Tamil Nadu Plaintiff Versus State of Kerala & Anr. Defendants JUDGMENT R.M. LODHA, CJI. This Court remains seized of the problem with regard to the water level of Mullaperiyar dam after it had solved on 27.02.2006 (Mullaperiyar Environmental Protection Forum[1].) because the Kerala State Legislature enacted the law immediately thereafter fixing and limiting Full Reservoir Level (FRL) to 136 ft. Mullaperiyar dam :1886. Lease Agreement 2. Mullaperiyar dam a masonry dam was constructed pursuant to the Periyar Lake Lease Agreement dated 29.10.1886 (1886 Lease Agreement) across Periyar river. The construction continued for about eight years and was completed in 1895. The dam is situated at Thekkady District in Kerala and is owned and operated by the Government of Tamil Nadu. By the 1886 Lease Agreement between the Maharaja of Travancore and the Secretary of State for India in Counc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. t January, 2019 Pronounced on:15. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4374/2018 & CM No.16982/2018 ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kamal Gupta and Ms. Pragya Agrawal, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC ..... RESPONDENTS for GNCTD with Mr. Chirayu Jain and Ms. N. Goyal, Advs. Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Ms. Shikha Sharma Bagga, Advs. for Justice for All Reserved on:6. h February, 2019 Pronounced on:15. h March, 2019 + W.P.(C) 13546/2018 & CM APPL. 52763/2018 (for stay) MOUNT CARMEL SCHOOL SOCIETY AND ANR ....... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Vedanta Varma, Mr. Chandan Kumar Mandal, Mr. Akhil Kumar Gola and Ms. Mannat Sandhu, Advs. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC with Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC for W.P.(C) 4374/2018 & W.P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 25-5-2001 made by the Chairman, Securities & Exchange Board of India (Respondent herein). The order is made under sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 ('the Act'). By the said order the appellants (First Global Group) have been debarred from undertaking any fresh business as stock broker, merchant banker, or portfolio manager, pending enquiry. An enquiry has been ordered into certain alleged violations of the Act, Rules and Regulations by the appellants.The order provides for appointment of an enquiry officer for the purpose in a week's time, and requires the enquiry officer to complete the enquiry expeditiously by following the prescribed procedure and taking into consideration the existing material and material which may be further supplemented. It has also been stated in the order that on receipt of the enquiry report a view will be taken by the respondent as to whether the appellan...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
S.B. Sinha Introduction Interpretation of a provision contained in an Agreement dated 3.2.2006, is in question in this petition, wherein the petitioner inter alia has prayed for the following reliefs :- “A) Issue an injunction, order or direction or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the demand notice dated 21.4.2010 and invoices dt. 9.9.2009 issued by Respondent no.1 B) Issue a direction that the obligation on part of the petitioner to pay rent for the CTI open/covered licensed infrastructure as per agreement dt. 7.2.2006 arose from 21.8.2009, i.e. the date of commencement of FM broadcast from the CTI facility. C) Award the costs of the instant petition to the petitioner.” Background Facts Pursuant to an invitation of offer issued by the Central Government to issue licenses for broadcasting FM radio in Phase II in September, 2005, the petitioner amongst others submitted its tender. The said invitation to tender inter alia contained the following condit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Company Law Board CLB
Reported in : (2008)143CompCas635
1. The Petitioners 1 & 2 together holding 11.76% of the issued and paid up capital of M/s VJIL Consulting Limited ("the Company"), aggrieved on account of certain alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the Company it the instance of the first respondent, have invoked the provisions of Sections 111A, 237, 397 & 398 read with Sections 402, 403 & 406 of the Act, seeking the following reliefs: a) to remove the first respondent from the post of Joint Managing Director of the Company, b) to direct the respondents 1, 3 to 7 to sell their shares in favour of the Company and order corresponding reduction of share capital of the Company; c) to direct the Company rectifying the register of members and reducing the number of equity shares of the respondents 1, 3 to 7, acquired in violation of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 and SEBI (Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992; and 2. Shri P....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8438 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (C) No.8463 of 2008) KEDAR NATH YADAV APPELLANT Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.8440 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.10731/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8441 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.11783/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8444 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.11830/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8446 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12360/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8447 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12724/2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8453 OF2016Arising out of SLP(C)NO.25580 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) .CC No.13645/2008 And CIVIL APPEAL NO.8449 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) No.22491/2008) JUDGMENT V. GOPALA GOWDA, J.Delay condoned in SLP (C) CC No.13645 of 2008. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions. The present appeals arise out of the impugned final common judgment and order dated 18.01.2008 in W.P. No.23836 (W) of 2006 and connected petitions, passed by the ...
Tag this Judgment!