Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insurance amendment act 2002 section 6 amendment of section 28b Page 8 of about 8,658 results (0.215 seconds)

Ramniwas and Others Vs. Game Range Chambal Sanctuary Bhind Headquarter ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2012CrLJ1747

..... prashant sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in misc.cri.case no. 6856/2010 has also placed heavy reliance on section 55 of the 1927 act (madhya pradesh amendment) and submits that unless the petitioners are found to be guilty by an authority/court of competent jurisdiction, their vehicles cannot be even seized. he submits ..... reliance on (2003) 2 scc (cri) 1943 (sunderbhai ambalal desai vs. state of gujarat), which was recently followed in (2010) 3 scc (cri) 226 (general insurance council and others vs. state of andhra pradesh and others) to submit that if vehicle is unnecessarily kept in the police station or with the forest department, no useful ..... opinion of this court, various single benches in the cases of kanhaiyalal (1987 cri.l.j.368), rishinath singh (1992 cri.l.j. 1764) and vishambhar yadav (2002 (3) mplj 245) (supra) have rightly taken a consistent view that the vehicle cannot be released after getting an intimation from the forest department by the magistrate. .....

Jagjitsingh Vs. Shashikant Ramesh Tayde and Another

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... . neither the respondent no.1-claimant, nor the appellant, the owner of the vehicle in question, have placed anything on record to show that the vehicle was insured and such insurance was valid and subsisting on the date of occurrence of the accident on 20-12-1992. in view of this, the owner was held liable for payment of compensation ..... and khurana transport, mondha bazar, hingoli, district hingoli. the appellant does not dispute that he was the resident of this place. the correct address was supplied on 1-8-2002, on which the appellant was served, but he failed to appear. it cannot, therefore, be said that the appellant was not duly served with the notice of the ..... , the earlier claim petition no.67 of 1993 was filed within a period of limitation. by virtue of amendment to sub-section (3) of section 166 of the motor vehicles act, the provision of limitation was deleted with effect from 14-11-1994. it was thereafter that the earlier claim petition no.67 of 1993 was dismissed in default. .....

Allied Instruments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2002)LC634Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the words "the orders of any authority whose sanction is necessary". it was unfortunate that when the legislature came to amend the old section 71 of the act it forgot to amend section 90 in conformity with the amendment of section 71. but this lacuna cannot be supplied by any such liberal construction as the high court sought to put ..... view of the retrospective validation of the service tax rules, all the appellants were required to pay service tax on the gross amount of the transport charges excluding insurance charges paid by them to the goods transport operator. he directed the appellants to work out the tax payable and pay the same along with interest. the appellants ..... service tax the appellants are entitled to succeed in the light of the tribunal's decision in markfed oil & allied industries v.cce, chandigarh - 2002 (146) e.l.t. 466 (t) = 2002 (53) rlt 276 wherein the commissioner's order for payment of service tax with interest was set aside on the ground that the show cause notice .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Chandulal Gokaldas Mehta (Deceased ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : III(2004)ACC260

..... the act. no doubt, it was open to make wider coverage by making payment of additional or higher premium. so is not the ..... the policy and the resultant statutorily restricted liability of the insurer. it has been now very well propounded and expounded by a constitution bench decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of new india assurance co. ltd. v. c.m. jaya : [2002]1scr298 , that the liability of the insurer before amendment in 1988 was limited as provided in section 95 of .....

Kohli Brothers Colour Lab (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner, Income Tax

Court : Allahabad

..... are now being straightaway allowed in the year of written off. for this purpose, he relied on the ratio laid down in the following cases-income tax v. general insurance corporation of india, (2002) : 254 itr 204 (bom.), page 209 where it was observed that-however, so far as the exact requirement of the writing off is concerned, the language used in ..... prashant chandra submits that in the instant case, the assessee has written off the bad debt as per the proviso to section 36(1)(vii) of the income tax act. after the amendment w.e.f. 1.4.1989, the entire amount of bad debt which has been written off as not recoverable in the accounts of the assessee for the previous ..... the assessee was not in doubt. therefore, all that the tribunal has done is to uphold the first appellate authority's decision, applying the provisions of the amended section 36(1)(vii) of the act, and no question of law arises in the matter from such application of the provision to the facts of the case.in the case of cit v .....

Gagan Chowdhary Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and Another

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... new india insurance company limited (for short hereinafter referred to as the insurance company and another). 2. the district forum has rejected the complaint at the preliminary hearing which has now been provided under the consumer protection act, 1986 (for short hereinafter referred to as the c.p. act) as amended by amendment no. 62 of 2002 which has ..... been enforced from 15.3.2003. the district forum has found that the complainant is running a commercial business and since the services of the respondents are alleged to have been hired and availed in connection with the commercial purpose which has now under the amended act ..... applicable to section 2(1)(d)(ii) also, the complaint was not maintainable under the c.p. act as amended. the district forum also held that it was difficult to believe that the complainant was earning his .....

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Chowgule and Company Ltd.

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... years to a period of 10 years with effect from 1/04/1999. the karnataka high court considered the object behind the amendment which read as under: clause 3 seeks to amend section 10a of the income tax act. under the existing provisions, tax holiday is available to newly established industrial undertaking set up in free trade zones and to ..... exclusion made by the ao in respect of amount received towards miscellaneous income, sale of scrap, service charges, grant-in-aid for medical expenses, recovery of fuel, group insurance, deptch money, being not having any nexus with the export activity of the assessee under clause (baa) of explanation for the purpose of determining profits of the business u ..... and tax appeal no.7 of 2008 under section 260-a of the income tax act, 1961 challenge the orders dated 12/07/2007 and 19/07/2007, respectively of the income tax appellate tribunal, panaji bench. the relevant assessment year is 2002-03 in tax appeal no.6/2008 and 2003-2004 in tax appeal no.7/2008 .....

Jo Joseph Vs. Sebastian Mathew and the Director of State, Insurance De ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ155Ker

..... (3) klt 348} and a full bench decision of this court reported in united india insurance co. ltd. v. alavi {1998 (1) klt 951}. 6. in the full bench decision, this court considered the applicability of the amendment to the provisions of sections 4 and 4a by act 30 of 1995 which came into force on 15.9.1995. this court made it ..... date of the accident. necessarily, it shall apply to the interest rate as well. 8. the counsel for the appellant has pointed out a later decision reported in oriental insurance co. v. mohammed {2002 (1) klt 131} where division bench has taken the view that as payment of interest depends upon the time of payment of compensation, the workmen is entitled to .....

imperial Tobacco Limited Vs. the Lord Advocate (Scotland)

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... before the scottish parliament, they do not seek to challenge that evidence in these proceedings. nor is their challenge brought, as was done in axa general insurance ltd v lord advocate, on the ground that the provisions in question are open to review on common law grounds as an unreasonable, irrational and arbitrary ..... uksc 46, 2012 sc (uksc) 122 one of the grounds of the unsuccessful challenge to the damages (asbestos-related conditions) (scotland) act 2009 was that its provisions were incompatible with the insurers' convention rights under article 1 of the first protocol. in sinclair collis ltd v lord advocate [2012] csih 80 a challenge by a ..... v scottish ministers 2002 sc (pc) 63. legislation prohibiting mounted foxhunting was challenged unsuccessfully on the ground that it was contrary to the petitioners' convention rights in adams v scottish ministers 2004 sc 665and whaley v lord advocate [2007] ukhl 53, 2008 sc (hl) 107. an amendment to the criminal procedure (scotland) act 1995, which .....

1. M/S. Pardeep Electricals and Builders Pvt. Ltd. and Anr Vs. Union o ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... , banking service, insurance service etc. thus, it was further clarified that inclusion of tax in whole price of services provided was not covered under rule 19 of the rules of 1962. the deduction of cost of labour from amount payable to contractor had been withdrawn after explanation-1 (a) to section 2 (h) was deleted vide amendment act no.7 of ..... is made to clarification no.8 of 2006 dated 14.08.2006, clarification no.1 of 2009 dated 09.04.2009, clarification no.27 of 2000 dated 08.02.2002, clarification no.11 of 2005 dated 20.05.2005 and clarification no.6 of 2008 dated 11.02.2008 in this regard. deduction of tax by respondent no.8 over ..... or a works contract . this assumes significance in view of the fact that in case of the former, the entire sales consideration would be taxable under sales tax act or vat act whereas in the later case, the part of consideration payable on account of labour and service element would be excluded from the total consideration received and sales tax or .....