Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insurance amendment act 2002 section 6 amendment of section 28b Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 305 results (0.135 seconds)

A. Vijaya and ors. Vs. Vegurla Rajaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC622; 2006ACJ1371; 2005(4)ALD725; 2005(4)ALT487

..... the multiplier mentioned in the structured table has no application in case of claims filed under section 166 of m.v. act, 1988 even if the accident occurred after coming into force of the said provision by the amendment act no. 54 of 1994. he also submits that the multiplier applied by the tribunal is on high side and therefore ..... thomas, : air1994sc1631 .(2) u.p. state road transport corporation v. trilok chandra, : (1996)4scc362 .(3) patricia jean mahajan v. united india insurance co. ltd., 2002 (1) acj 1 (sc).(4) united india insurance co. ltd. v. patricia jean mahajan, : [2002]3scr1176 .(5) helen c rebello and ors. v. maharashtra r.t.c. and anr., : air1998sc3191 .(6) kaushnuma begum and ors v. new ..... , ksrtc v. mahadeva shetty and anr., 2003 (1) dt (sc) 662.(2) m.p. state road transport corporation bairagarh, bhopal v. sudhakai, 1977 acj 290.(3) oriental insurance co. ltd v. g. seshamma, : 2002(5)ald615 (d.b.).(4) apsrtc v. shafiya khatoon, 1985 acj 212 (a.p.) (d.b.).(5) united india .....

The Branch Manager, United India Insuran Vs. Dasari Parvathiand Othe

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... contained in section 147 w 21. the upshot of the aforementioned discussions is that instead and in place of the insurer, the owner of the vehicle shall f) so, the supreme court observed that despite the amendment of m.v.act w.e.f 14.11.1994, the position of gratuitous passeng we, therefore, clarify the legal position which shall ..... prasad rao m.a.c.m.a.no.489 of 2009 judgment: aggrieved by the award dated 03.10.2002 in o.p.no.497 of 1998 passed by the chairman, m.a.c.t-cum-i additional district judg the respondents 1 to 3 in the appeal are claimants ..... a no.489 of 2009 23-04-2014 the branch manager, united india insurance co.ltd.vijayawada,...appellant dasari parvathiand others.respondents counsel for appellant: sr.naresh byrapaneni counsel for respondents 1 to 3 : sr.r. raghunandan : ?.cases referred: 1) air2000supreme court 235 (1) 2) 2001 (1) alt4853) 2002 (8) supreme 594 4) air2004sc13405) 2003 acj468honble sr.justice u. durga .....

Sree Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Rice Mill and Others Vs. United India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... calculation memo stating that they have deposited the demand drafts on 29/6/2010 giving the calculations as follows: from the aforementioned calculations, it is clear that the insurance company deducted 20% on the amount awarded towards tds. they also filed a memo which states as follows: in respect of all cases where pan is not ..... much after and subsequent to the order of the national commission. the rule position is as follows: a similar amendment has been made in section 194c(1) with effect from june, 1, 2007. circular no.9 of 2002 making a distinction between nominal member and duly registered member with regard to their rights and privileges, is outside ..... pan numbers. we also observe from the record that no such demand has been made by the insurance company on the complainant to furnish the pan number. without even asking for the pan numbers, the act of the opposite party, insurance company, in unilaterally deducting 20% when there is a rule position which clearly states that only 10 .....

United India Insurance Company Limited, Tirupati Branch, Tirupati Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : II(2002)ACC326; 2003ACJ191; 2002(3)ALD817; 2002(2)ALT700

..... learned counsel for the claimants-respondents herein filed cmp no. 1251 of 2002 in cma no. 2981 of 2001 under order 6, rule 17 cpc praying to permit the claimants to make an amendment of their claim from 163-a to 166 of the motor vehicles act. while arguing the above cmp., the learned counsel for the claimants-respondents ..... applying the multiplier to assess the compensation?6. the learned counsel mr. n. subba rao appearing on behalf of the respondents herein relied upon a ruling reported in oriental insurance company limited v. hansraj bhai v. kondala and ors., : [2001]2scr999 .7. we have gone through the said ruling and we are of the considered view ..... be made use of selecting the multiplier.11. the learned counsel mr. n. subba rao further relied upon a ruling reported in sailada chinathalli and ors. v. oriental insurance company limited, rep. by its branch manager, vizianagaram., : 1994(2)alt500 (db). from the aforesaid judgment, the learned counsel of the respondents herein read out some .....

Samala Gangadhar Vs. Ch. Gangaram and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : I(2005)ACC166; 2006ACJ385; 2004(5)ALD84; 2004(5)ALT115

..... , lest, so specified.7. the sole applicant filed the said w.c. no. 84 of 2002, before the said commissioner, against the owner and the insurance company, under section 22 of the said workmen's compensation act, 1923 (w.c. act, 1923), for recovery of total compensation of rs. 2,00,000/-, with interest thereon, in respect of the injuries, and disabilities, ..... .21. the same reasonings and the same findings, as are set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph, will, mutatis mutandis, apply to the said explanation ii, wherein, by amendment act 46 of 2000, which came into force, on 8-8-2000, the said sum of rs. 2,000/- was substituted by a sum of rs. 4,000/-.22. ..... commissioner, erroneously, failed to award any interest, or, at that rate, etc. hence, this court has to award the same.33. by amendment act 14 of 1995, section 4a(3)(a) of the said w.c. act, 1923, was amended in the year 1995, inter alia, fixing, statutorily, the minimum rate of interest, which is irreducible, at 12%, per annum.34. .....

Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vibudhi Durgaiah and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004ACJ1462; 2003(1)ALT72

..... owners of the goods travelling in a goods vehicle.7. in these cases, the accident occurred on 17.9.1992, whereas by the central act 54 of 1994, section 147(1)(b)(i) was amended making the insurance company liable for the death or bodily injury of even owner of goods or his/her authorised representative carried in the vehicle with effect from ..... larger bench. he further submits that a division bench of this court in new india assurance co. ltd. v. nadella venkata subbamma, 2002 acj 1985 (ap) and a learned single judge of this court in soroju satyavathi v. oriental insurance co. ltd., : 2000(6)ald331 , have held that a gratuitous passenger and owner of the goods travelling in a goods vehicle are .....

A. Venkateswara Rao Vs. the New India Assurance Co., Ltd., and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... in iv (2008) cpj 65 and i(2009) cpj 158 (nc) 11. indian motor tariff regulation issued by tariff advisory committee a creature of sec. 64u of insurance act 1938 as amended by amendment act 62 of 1968 w.e.f. 7.6.gr-10 of the imt was issued by tariff advisory committee under indian motor tariff and it came into force from ..... the policy described in the certificate in his favour and the insurer shall make the necessary changes in the certificate and the policy of insurance in regard to the transfer of insurance. 13. it is to be noted that indian motor tariff regulations had undergone an amendment with effect from 30.6.2002. 14. the complainant has got the vehicle only transferred in his ..... bearing no.ap 10t 9776 from the opposite party no.2 on 4.2.2003 and the vehicle was insured by the opposite party no.2 with the opposite party no.1 insurance company vide policy no.612800 for the period from 30.10.2002 to 29.10.2003. the vehicle was involved in an accident on 6.4.2003. the complainant .....

Deekonda Suresh Vs. D. Dharmaraju and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ977; 2007(1)ALD710; 2007(4)ALT704

..... identical case a division bench of this court in united india insurance company limited, tirupati v. mokkala chandramma and ors. : 2002(3)ald817 , held that a petition claiming compensation filed under section 166 of the act can at any stage of the proceedings be amended as a petition under section 163(a) of the act. further, after a detailed discussion the gujarat high court in ..... national insurance co. ltd. v. mukeshbhai bhalchandrabhai jani (deceased) through heirs ranjanben and .....

Visakhapatnam Port Trust Vs. Commercial Tax Officer Krupam Market, Vis ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(4)ALD310

..... interim stay of the assessment order dated 11-1-2002 for the assessment year 1998-99 in w.p.no.1828 of 2002.12. as these two writ petitions have fallen for consideration, they are decided by the following common order:13. through the amendment (act 27 of 1996), explanation-iv to section 2(e ..... the second schedule to the reserve bank of india act, 1934; (j) advertising agencies; (k) any other corporation, company body or authority owned or ..... holding permits for transport vehicles granted under the motor vehicles act, 1988 which are used or adopted to be used for hire; (g) the andhra pradesh state road transport corporation; (h) customs department of the government of india administering the customs act, 1962; (i) insurance and financial corporations or companies and banks included in .....

H. Ravi Prakash Reddy Vs. R.K. Krishna Murthy and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ1265; 2007(5)ALD77; 2007(4)ALT155

..... the first respondent.2. revision petitioner filed a petition under order 6 rule 17 cpc seeking leave to amend his counter by taking a plea that the tribunal constituted under the act has no jurisdiction to entertain the claim inasmuch as the vehicle was not insured by the date of accident. the tribunal by the order under revision dismissed the said petition. hence ..... negligence in not renewing the insurance cannot set at naught the bar contained in section 175 of the act. so i am unable to agree with the view taken by the learned judge in that case. in fact, union of india v. bhagwati prasad : [2002]2scr290 supports my view. in that case a taxi collided with allahabad saharanpur passenger train resulting in the .....