Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insurance amendment act 2002 section 6 amendment of section 28b Court: andhra pradesh Page 4 of about 305 results (0.404 seconds)

The Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ratan Prakash ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(1)ALT1

..... /- which is also mentioned in the policy. under these circumstances any comment about the non-filing of a copy of the insurance policy lying with the insurance company is not warranted.7. applicability of the amending act to an accident that took place prior to 1-10-1982 was considered by the bombay high court in indrajit singh v. ..... ,000/- and therefore, the tribunal erred in granting the sum of rs. 50,000/-. the tribunal limited the liability of the insurer to the sum of rs. 50,000/- in view of the amendment act which came into force on march 2, 1970. the supreme court set aside the judgment of the high court holding that the liability ..... section 95 of the act. section 95 of the act along with some other provisions of the act were amended under the amendment act no. 47/82 (hereinafter referred to as the 'amending act'.). under section 13 of the amending act which came into force on and from 1-10-1982, the liability of the insurance company under section 95 of the act in question is enhanced .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ratan Prakash Rao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1991ACJ332

..... 50,000/-which is also mentioned in the policy. under these circumstances any comment about the non-filing of a copy of the insurance policy lying with the insurance company is not warranted.7. applicability of the amending act to an accident that took place prior to 1.10.1982 was considered by the bombay high court in inderjeet singh & co ..... ,000/- and therefore, the tribunal erred in granting the sum of rs. 50,000/-. the tribunal limited the liability of the insurer to the sum of rs. 50,000/-in view of the amendment act which came into force on march 2, 1970. the supreme court set aside the judgment of the high court holding that the liability ..... 95 of the act. section 95 of the act along with some other provisions of the act were amended under the amendment act no. 47 of 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the 'amending act'). under section 13 of the amending act which came into force on and from 1.10.1982, the liability of the insurance company under section 95 of the act in question is .....

A. Vijaya and ors. Vs. Vegurla Rajaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC622; 2006ACJ1371; 2005(4)ALD725; 2005(4)ALT487

..... the multiplier mentioned in the structured table has no application in case of claims filed under section 166 of m.v. act, 1988 even if the accident occurred after coming into force of the said provision by the amendment act no. 54 of 1994. he also submits that the multiplier applied by the tribunal is on high side and therefore ..... thomas, : air1994sc1631 .(2) u.p. state road transport corporation v. trilok chandra, : (1996)4scc362 .(3) patricia jean mahajan v. united india insurance co. ltd., 2002 (1) acj 1 (sc).(4) united india insurance co. ltd. v. patricia jean mahajan, : [2002]3scr1176 .(5) helen c rebello and ors. v. maharashtra r.t.c. and anr., : air1998sc3191 .(6) kaushnuma begum and ors v. new ..... , ksrtc v. mahadeva shetty and anr., 2003 (1) dt (sc) 662.(2) m.p. state road transport corporation bairagarh, bhopal v. sudhakai, 1977 acj 290.(3) oriental insurance co. ltd v. g. seshamma, : 2002(5)ald615 (d.b.).(4) apsrtc v. shafiya khatoon, 1985 acj 212 (a.p.) (d.b.).(5) united india .....

L.K. Kousalya Devi and anr. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : III(2006)ACC219

..... or default of the owner of the vehicle, which is insured, still, he is liable to pay compensation. for payment of compensation in case of fatal accidents, second schedule is provided to this section for applying the multiplier, based on age of deceased. this provision was inserted by amendment act 54 of 1994 on 14th november, 1994.14. from a ..... 2002) acc 326 (db) : 2003 agj 191 and also of the judgment of the learned single judge of this court in united india insurance co. ltd. v. dangugula bheem bai ii (2005) acc 396 : 2004 (3) a.l.d. (n.o.c.) 325. in the alternative, she submitted that the accident occurred on 23rd april 1993 i. e., prior to the amendment act ..... 54 of 1994, through which section 163a was inserted with second schedule and as the amendment is prospective, .....

Suguna and Others Vs. T. Jayaraman and Anothe

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... that the risk of gratuitous passengers in a goods vehicle will not be covered by the policies issued in terms of section 147 of the amended act of 1994. accordingly, the tribunal held that the 2nd respondent/insurance company is not liable to answer the claim of the claimants and the 1st respondent/ owner alone is liable to pay compensation. hence, the appeal ..... -2014 suguna and others....appellants t. jayaraman and another...respondents counsel for appellants: sr.s.v.muni reddy counsel for respondent no.2: sr.v. sambasiva rao : ?.cases referred: 1) 2002 (8) supreme 594 2) air2004sc1340= 2004 (2) scc13) 2011 (4) ald778(db) 4) 2009 acj1298= air2009sc31045) 2013 acj14036) 2001 (1) alt495(db) 7) air2000supreme court 235 (1) 8) 2003 acj468 .....

The Branch Manager, United India Insuran Vs. Dasari Parvathi and Othe

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... kaurs case (4 supra) (decided on 06.01.2004) the supreme court was considering the question as to whether an insurance policy issued in respect of goods vehicle would cover gratuitous passengers in the light of section 147 of m.v.act (amendment act 1994 w.e.f.14.11.1994).the facts of the case are that the victim who was returning in ..... -cum-i additional district judge, ongole (for short the tribunal).the second respondent/united insurance company limited preferred the instant appeal. the respondents 1 to 3 in the appeal are ..... 3 : sr.r. raghunandan : ?. cases referred: 1) air2000supreme court 235 (1) 2) 2001 (1) alt4853) 2002 (8) supreme 594 4) air2004sc13405) 2003 acj468honble sr.justice u. durga prasad rao m.a.c.m.a.no.489 of 2009 judgment: aggrieved by the award dated 03.10.2002 in o.p.no.497 of 1998 passed by the chairman, m.a.c.t .....

T. Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. C. Govardana Naidu and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1990ACJ66; AIR1990AP289

..... reasoning given by the learned judge is accepted, then the provision cannot be applied even to a case where the accident occurred subsequent to the amended act, on the ground that the contract of insurance was earlier to the date when the provision came into force.16. let us give a practical illustration. the ..... view in oriental fire & general insurance co. ltd. v. shantabai s. dhume (1987) 1 acj 198 : (air 1987 bom 52). the learned judge held that section 92a applies to all pending cases irrespective of the date on which the accident occurred and the fact that the amendment act postulates that the amendments will come into force on the ..... the identity of the vehicle involved in the accident not being known, the persons affected cannot prefer any claims for compensation. it is, therefore,considered necessary to amend the act suitable to secure strict enforcement of road safety measures and also to make, as a measure of social justice, suitable provisions first for compensation without, proof .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sammayya M. Shankar (Workman) and anr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997ACJ185; 1995(3)ALD809; 1995(3)ALT470; [1997(75)FLR498]

..... compensation in the case of non-schedule injury is required to be done strictly in terms of the provisions of section 4(1)(c) of the act, as amended by the amendment act 22 of 1984. the learned counsel also points out that in the present case, admittedly, there is no assessment of loss of earning capacity of ..... basis of the oral and documentary evidence placed before him and in the absence of any contra evidence and placing reliance on the decision of this court in national insurance company limited v. mohammed saleem khan : (1992)iillj377ap , considered the disablement of the respondent - workman total and on that basis, and having regard to the ..... respondent-workman filed w. c. no. 28/91 before the commissioner alleging the aforementioned facts and claiming compensation under the provisions of the act. 2. in the claim application, the appellant insurance company was arrayed as respondent no. 2 and the employer of the workman was arrayed as respondent no. 1 both the respondents were served .....

L.K. Kousalyadevi and anr. Vs. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007ACJ301; 2006(1)ALD597; 2006(1)ALT281

..... united india insurance co. ltd. v. mokkala chandramma : 2002(3)ald817 (d.b.) and also of the judgment of the learned single judge of this court in united india insurance co. ltd. v. dangugula bheem bai : 2004(5)alt515 . in the alternative, she submitted that the accident occurred on 23-4-1993 i.e., prior to the amendment act 54 of ..... default of the owner of the vehicle, which is insured, still, he is liable to pay compensation. for payment of compensation in case of fatal accidents, second schedule is provided to this section for applying the multiplier, based on age of deceased. this provision was inserted by amendment act 54 of 1994 on 14-11-1994.14. from ..... 1994, through which section 163-a was inserted with second schedule and as the amendment is prospective, the second schedule cannot .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Takkeda Venkateswara Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : I(2005)ACC415

..... any independent civil miscellaneous appeals and the said owners intend to take shelter under the same appeal preferred by the appellant national insurance co. ltd. under section 140 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 prior to the amending act, 54 of 1994, the amount of no fault liability payable in the case of death was rs. 25,000/-. it ..... kammampati parameswara rao (supra). in a.a.o. no. 1132 of 1998, wherein this court by judgment dated 14th november, 2002 had taken the same view and had allowed the appeal filed by the insurance company.9. it is no doubt true that the owners of the vehicles had not preferred independent appeals but the question is ..... counsel had placed reliance on padtna srinivasan v. premier insurance co. ltd. 1982 a.c.j. 191; new india assurance co. ltd. v. salapuriappa ; adagari aruna v. kammampati paratneswara rao : 1998(2)ald715 , and also the judgment in a.a.o. no. 1132 of 1998 dated 14th november, 2002.5. mr. rangacharyulu representing the owners of the vehicles .....