Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (1987)IILLJ83AP
..... also provides for insurance of vehicles and the liabilities of the insurer. for compensation is fatal accidents the provisions of fatal accidents act have to be kept in view. section 110-aa gives an option to a claimant to avail of the remedy under this act or the workmen's compensation act. 29. the parliament has by the amending act 22 of 1984 ..... for death is as determined by multiplying the dependency with the factor or rs. 20,000/- whichever is more. by the central amending act 47/1982, section 92-a to e were introduced in the motor vehicles act. section 92-a provides for a no fault liability of rs. 15,000/- in case of death. this may be adopted ..... in motor accident cases. in that search we scrutinised the table introduced by the parliament of india in amendment act no. 22 of 1984 with effect from july 1, 1984 in workmen's compensation act of 1923. the substituted table under section 4 of the act is to the effect - 'the amount of compensation shall be - '(a) where death results from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1993(3)ALT471
..... a presidential order to 'exercise such jurisdiction, powers and authority (including any jurisdiction, power and authority which immediately before the commencement of the constitution (32nd amendment) act, 1973 was exercisable by any court (other than the supreme court) or by any tribunal or other authority) as may be specified in the order with ..... state government. a bill was brought forward to provide for necessary constitutional authority for giving effect to this formula and the same became the constitution (32nd amendment) act under which article 371d was introduced. see govt. of a.p. v. suryanarayana rao : air1991sc2113 .'the purpose of enacting article 371d was to provide ..... jurisdiction under article i cannot be conferred by by the congress on courts established under article iii. the distinction was brought out clearly in national mugal insurance company of the district of columbia v. tidewater transfer company, 93 led. 1556 = 337 u.s. 582:'whether a court is of one category .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2004(6)ALD188; 2004(6)ALT594
..... been urged by the learned counsel for the petitioners that many of the corporations referred to in section 2(e)(2)(ii) of the public premises act, like the natinoalised banks and the life insurance corporation, are trading corporations and under the provisions of the enactments whereby they are constituted these corporations are required to carry on their business with a ..... creates a big anomaly, but it is not for this court to fill up lacuna in the statute. it is for the legislature to take note of and provisions are amended, and exemption is granted to the buildings of central government as well as instrumentality of state governments. they have to be brought within the purview of the exemption of ..... the file of the senior civil judge, peddapalli, whereunder, the learned senior civil judge, dismissed the appeal, confirming the order, dated 5-3-2002, in r.c.c. no. 21 of 1997 on the file of the rent controller-cum-junior civil judge, peddapalli.2. the petitioner herein is the tenant and the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2000ACJ350; 1998(3)ALD244; 1998(4)ALT26
..... loss of expectation of life, pecuniary loss by adopting the multiplier method and accordingly rs.48,000/- was awarded as a whole, taking into consideration the fact that the amended act has fixed rs.25,000/- as the minimum compensation in all cases of death of a human being, whetheran adult or a child, man or woman. in fact ..... ,000/-. the apportionment of compensation shall be made equally among the claimants. the amount already paid shall be deducted.45. cma no. 1243 of 1990 : the national insurance company, guntur who was respondent in op np.143 of 1988 on the file of the motor accidents claims tribunal, ongole has questioned the award of the tribunal dated ..... by this court in several latest pronouncements, namely:1. k. ramalingam v. g. kalavati, : 1997(1)alt707 .2. u. kanaka durgatnma v. d. suryanarayana, : 1997(1)alt739 .3. oriental insurance co., ltd v. k. ratnana, : 1997(1)alt417 .4. g. sugunamma v. k koteswara rao, : 1997(1)alt539 .5. a. hanumanth reddy v. b. jaswanth singh bhatia, : .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1979(4)ELT334(AP)
..... 20-8-1975 directing the petitioner to file its price list by 15-9-1975 in accordance with the provisions of the new section 4(a) of the act as introduced by the amending act of 1973 and brought into force with effect from 1-10-1975. by his letter dated 3-10-1975, the 2nd respondent refused to accept the price list ..... ) expenses of publicity or advertisement in connection with the sale of the finished goods ;(b) expenses of storage of the finished goods, commonly known as 'godown charges' ;(c) charges of insurance of the finished goods ;(d) selling profits and selling costs inclusive of expenses of promotion of sales ;(e) expenses of marketing and distribution ;(f) freight charges ;(g) interest on credit .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1999ACJ831; 1998(1)ALD720; 1998(2)ALT11
..... which resulted in the injury or where either the injured workman or in the event of his death his dependents reside. the amendment act itself provided in section 1(2) that the provisions of the amendment act shall come into force on such date or dates the central government may in the official gazette publish. in pursuance of the ..... and hence are disposed of by this common judgment. the parties are referred to as arrayed in the c.m.a.2. the appellant is the insurance company who insured respondents covering accidents to their workmen in both the cases the accidents occurred in the stale of maharashtra so far as the l.p.a.no.175 ..... the case was contested by the appellant by cross-examining the witnesses of the petitioner before the commissioner and also filing documents like insurance policy containing vehicle number, name of the owner and regarding insurance etc. and closed his evidence. the record of the case does not show the question of lack of territorial jurisdiction to have been .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1997(2)ALT358
..... compensation' in this section mean any one of the classes of the claims specified in section 110(1) of the act namely (1) death (2) bodily injury and (3) damage to the property. after the amendments made by the amending acts no. 56 of 1969 and no. 47 of 1978, as held above by us, there cannot be any doubt ..... or damage suffered or the amount required or spent for replacement of part, or parts or accessories and reasonable repairing and fitting charges. the liability to indemnify the insured is limited to the contract. in no case it shall exceed the actual loss or damage or charges incurred subject to the maximum liability under the contract whichever is ..... the learned advocate has relied upon a decision of our court in jagadeshwar v. rajaiah, 1986 (1) alt 105, which followed its own pronouncement in united india fire & general insurance co. ltd, guntur v. mowli bhai, 1985 (1) alt 33 (nrc). in regard to the second contention, the precedents depended upon by him are rajkumar v. mahendra singh, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2004ACJ1462; 2003(1)ALT72
..... owners of the goods travelling in a goods vehicle.7. in these cases, the accident occurred on 17.9.1992, whereas by the central act 54 of 1994, section 147(1)(b)(i) was amended making the insurance company liable for the death or bodily injury of even owner of goods or his/her authorised representative carried in the vehicle with effect from ..... larger bench. he further submits that a division bench of this court in new india assurance co. ltd. v. nadella venkata subbamma, 2002 acj 1985 (ap) and a learned single judge of this court in soroju satyavathi v. oriental insurance co. ltd., : 2000(6)ald331 , have held that a gratuitous passenger and owner of the goods travelling in a goods vehicle are .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : III(2006)ACC606
..... of the goods travelling in a goods vehicle.7. in these cases, the accident occurred on 17.9.1992, whereas by the central act 54 of 1994, section 147(1)(b)(i) was amended making the insurance company liable for the death or bodily injury of even owner of goods or his/her authorised representative carried in the vehicle with effect from ..... . in soroju satyavathi (supra), his lordship has held that under section 147(1)(b)(i) as it stood before amendment by act 54 of 1994, the owner of the goods travelling in a goods vehicle is not covered by the insurance policy. the judgment was delivered on 29.8.2000. the judgment of justice ghulam mohammed was rendered on 21.12. ..... apex court, i hold that the words 'any person' used in the pre-amended provisions of section 147 of the new act shall be interpreted to mean and include 'owner of the goods' and that under section 147 of the pre- amending provisions of the new act, the insurer is liable to pay compensation in the event of death or bodily injury to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1996(2)ALT406; (1998)IIILLJ114AP
..... -llj-647) the supreme court has considered the effect of rule 17 framed by the bombay government prescribing limitation for filing application under section 75 of the employees' state insurance act, and stated as follows :'the question which directly confronts us is whether the power to prescribe periods of limitation for initiating proceedings before the court is a part of ..... section 77(1-a) provides that 'every such application shall be made within a period of three years from the date on which the cause of action arose'. by this amendment the claim under clause (d) as well as the one under clause (f) of sub-section (2) of section 75(2) which provides for the adjudication of a ..... for the recovery of any benefit admissible under the act for which a separate limitation was fixed under section 80, is now to be made within three years from the date of the accrual of the cause of action. this amendment also confirms the view taken by this court that the power under section 96(1)(b) does not .....
Tag this Judgment!