Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insurance act 1938 4 of 1938 section 10 separation of accounts and funds Sorted by: recent Page 8 of about 1,365 results (0.201 seconds)

Jul 10 2024 (SC)

Mohd Abdul Samad Vs. The State Of Telangana

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... certain households.44. while the contributions of such a homemaker get judicial recognition upon her unfortunate death while computing compensation in cases under the motor vehicles act, 1988 vide kirti vs. oriental insurance co. ltd., (2021) 2 scc166 the services and sacrifices of homemakers for the economic well- being of the family, and the economy of ..... fair and reasonable provision is to be criminal appeal no.2842 of 2024 page 35 of 43 made while maintenance is to be paid; secondly, section 4 of the act, which empowers the magistrate to issue an order for payment of maintenance to the divorced woman against various of her relatives, contains no reference to provision ..... it is submitted that the 1986 act being a special law, prevails over the provisions of crpc1973 to buttress his contentions, reliance is placed on a decision rendered by a 3-judge bench in m/s. jain ink manufacturing company v. life insurance corporation of india and another (1980) 4 scc435wherein this court went on to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2024 (SC)

M/s Daimler Chrysler India Pvt.ltd. Vs. M/s Controls

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... whether such a purchase was for the purpose of generating livelihood by means of self- employment need not be looked into.14. in the case of national insurance company limited vs. harsolia motors and others5, this court while relying and emphasizing on the principles laid down in lilavati kirtilal mehta medical trust (supra) ..... a company) were for a commercial purpose or not, within the definition of a consumer as contemplated in section 11 2(1)(d) of the said act, would depend upon facts and circumstances of each case. however ordinarily commercial purpose is understood to include manufacturing/industrial activity or business-to-business transactions between ..... increasing tendency.3. there is a variation of 5 - 9 degree temperature between the temperatures noted down from the two sensor gauges provided by the parties.4. on perusing the temperature chart, it is found that the temperature recorded by both the sensor gauges is higher than ambient temperature throughout the journey.22. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2024 (HC)

M/s Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt Ltd Vs. The Insurance Ombudsman

Court : Karnataka

..... shall be maintainable on the same subject matter on which proceedings are pending before or disposed of by any court or consumer forum or arbitrator.15. insurance ombudsman to act fairly and equitably. (1) the ombudsman may, if he deems fit, allow the complainant to adopt a procedure other than under sub-rule (1) or sub-rule ..... of the complainant; (iii) after expiry of a period of one month from the date of sending the written representation to the insurer if the insurer named fails to furnish reply to the complainant . (4) the ombudsman shall be empowered to condone the delay in such cases as he may consider 10 necessary, after calling for objections of ..... justice were sacred scriptures.33. in his separate opinion, concurring on this fundamental issue, k. ramaswamy, j.echoed the 29 aforesaid sentiments in the following words : (ecil case [(1993) 4 scc727:1993. scc (l&s) 1184 : (1993) 25 atc704 , scc p. 773, para61) 61. it is now settled law that the proceedings must be just, fair and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2024 (HC)

Sri. Channabasappa Lingappa Mokhashi Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council

Court : Karnataka

..... and takes benefits that were available to the advocate who surrenders their sanad from the karnataka advocates welfare fund under the karnataka advocates welfare fund act, 1983 ( the act for short). covid-19 moves away. normalcy is restored in the practice. the petitioner on realizing that he had committed a blunder by ..... legal dependents or heirs in accordance with the law of inheritance applicable to such member. (3) xxx 14 (4)while calculating period of completed years of practice for the purpose of payment under this act,- (i) fraction of three months and more shall be treated as one full year; and (ii) the ..... act 16 of 1958), for providing social security measures for the legal profession; (f) any sum borrowed under section 10; (g) all sums received from the life insurance corporation of india on the death of an advocate under the group insurance policy; 9 (h) any profit or dividend received from the life insurance corporation of india in respect of policies of group insurance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 2024 (HC)

The Branch Manager Vs. Smt Poornima M S

Court : Karnataka

..... is fastened upon the appellant herein to pay compensation to the claimants i.e., respondent nos.1, 2, 4 and 5 - 4 - nc:2024. khc:23054-db mfa no.6400 of 2021 herein, present appeal is preferred. the appellant is the insurance company.3. the tribunal through the impugned order awarded a sum of rs.40,78,310/- as compensation in ..... minor represented by respondent no.1; respondents3to6 served, unrepresented) - 3 - nc:2024. khc:23054-db mfa no.6400 of 2021 this mfa filed under section1731) of motor vehicles act, 1988 praying to set aside the judgment and award dated1102.2021 passed in mvc no.7/2020 on the file of the additional senior civil judge and jmfc, hunsur. this ..... 1. smt poornima m s w/o late pruthviraj m aged about29years2 kum. punarvinayak d/o late pruthviraj m aged about02years rept. by her mother1t petitioner smt poornima m s act as a natural guardian both are r/a maruru village hirikyathanahlli post - 2 - nc:2024. khc:23054-db mfa no.6400 of 2021 gavadagere hobli hunsur taluk-571105 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2024 (HC)

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Vs. Shri. Vijay S/o Shankar Rajam ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... exhibit p18-last pay certificate reveals that the deceased has paid an amount of rs.2,448/- per month towards postal insurance which comes to rs.29,376/- which is exempted from tax under section 80c of income tax act, 1961. hence, the gross salary of the petitioner would be less than rs.2,50,176/- after deducting the contribution ..... of the order by which the tribunal dismissed the claim petition of petitioner no.1 as against respondents 1 and 2 holding that petitioner is also entitled for compensation; 4. the claimants are entitled for compensation of rs.43,03,280/- as against rs.42,76,080/- awarded by the tribunal which shall interest at the rate of 6 ..... its driver and hence the respondents are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation with interest. on all these grounds, the claim petition was sought to be allowed.4. in spite of the service of notice, respondent no.1 remained absent and was placed ex-parte. respondent no.2 appeared through his advocate and filed a statement of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2024 (HC)

Vijay S/o Shankar Rajamane Vs. Santosh S/o Prabhakar Jadhav

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... exhibit p18-last pay certificate reveals that the deceased has paid an amount of rs.2,448/- per month towards postal insurance which comes to rs.29,376/- which is exempted from tax under section 80c of income tax act, 1961. hence, the gross salary of the petitioner would be less than rs.2,50,176/- after deducting the contribution ..... of the order by which the tribunal dismissed the claim petition of petitioner no.1 as against respondents 1 and 2 holding that petitioner is also entitled for compensation; 4. the claimants are entitled for compensation of rs.43,03,280/- as against rs.42,76,080/- awarded by the tribunal which shall interest at the rate of 6 ..... its driver and hence the respondents are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation with interest. on all these grounds, the claim petition was sought to be allowed.4. in spite of the service of notice, respondent no.1 remained absent and was placed ex-parte. respondent no.2 appeared through his advocate and filed a statement of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2024 (HC)

Shivanandappa Vs. The Managing Director

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of this court in m.f.a. no.1692/2012 (mv) dated 22.04.2013 in the case of united india insurance co. ltd. vs. smt. velangini @ velangani & others, at paragraph nos.4 to 6, has held as under: 4. it is not in dispute that the fifth respondent-ksrtc is the registered owner of bus involved in the accident and it ..... been deducted from compensation awarded to claimants. similarly, the insurance company should not have been directed to pay the same to ksrtc.5. shri nagaraj, learned counsel for the ksrtc would submit ..... was insured with appellant - insurance company. the ksrtc had paid a sum of rs.50,000/- as ex-gratia payment immediately after the accident. it was an act of grace. therefore, it should not have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2024 (HC)

The Managing Director Vs. Gouramma W/o Rameshappa Koller

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of this court in m.f.a. no.1692/2012 (mv) dated 22.04.2013 in the case of united india insurance co. ltd. vs. smt. velangini @ velangani & others, at paragraph nos.4 to 6, has held as under: 4. it is not in dispute that the fifth respondent-ksrtc is the registered owner of bus involved in the accident and it ..... been deducted from compensation awarded to claimants. similarly, the insurance company should not have been directed to pay the same to ksrtc.5. shri nagaraj, learned counsel for the ksrtc would submit ..... was insured with appellant - insurance company. the ksrtc had paid a sum of rs.50,000/- as ex-gratia payment immediately after the accident. it was an act of grace. therefore, it should not have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2024 (HC)

The Managing Director Vs. Shivanadappa S/o Veerabasappa Majjiger

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of this court in m.f.a. no.1692/2012 (mv) dated 22.04.2013 in the case of united india insurance co. ltd. vs. smt. velangini @ velangani & others, at paragraph nos.4 to 6, has held as under: 4. it is not in dispute that the fifth respondent-ksrtc is the registered owner of bus involved in the accident and it ..... been deducted from compensation awarded to claimants. similarly, the insurance company should not have been directed to pay the same to ksrtc.5. shri nagaraj, learned counsel for the ksrtc would submit ..... was insured with appellant - insurance company. the ksrtc had paid a sum of rs.50,000/- as ex-gratia payment immediately after the accident. it was an act of grace. therefore, it should not have .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //