Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insurance act 1938 4 of 1938 section 10 separation of accounts and funds Sorted by: recent Page 5 of about 1,365 results (0.339 seconds)

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Mr Puneet Kumar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... has been associated with the said company for over 18 years now. it is averred that it is one of the world s leading provider of insurance, re-insurance or insurance based risk transfer and has its presence across the world and headquartered at zurich. the complainant is an employee in one of the units of the ..... the complainant, she ought to have complained in the company before the committee constituted under the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 ( the act for short) when she was in employment. no such complaint was ever registered. after filing of the suit, criminal law is set in motion by ..... to the sexual harassment complaint. the employer is empowered to constitute the internal complaints committee under section 4 of the act and proceed with the enquiry and based on the report, initiate all further actions under the provisions of the act as well as under the service rules in force, more specifically, under the conduct and discipline .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Ms. Roli Singh Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... has been associated with the said company for over 18 years now. it is averred that it is one of the world s leading provider of insurance, re-insurance or insurance based risk transfer and has its presence across the world and headquartered at zurich. the complainant is an employee in one of the units of the ..... the complainant, she ought to have complained in the company before the committee constituted under the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 ( the act for short) when she was in employment. no such complaint was ever registered. after filing of the suit, criminal law is set in motion by ..... to the sexual harassment complaint. the employer is empowered to constitute the internal complaints committee under section 4 of the act and proceed with the enquiry and based on the report, initiate all further actions under the provisions of the act as well as under the service rules in force, more specifically, under the conduct and discipline .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Ms. Sabine Baechler Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... has been associated with the said company for over 18 years now. it is averred that it is one of the world s leading provider of insurance, re-insurance or insurance based risk transfer and has its presence across the world and headquartered at zurich. the complainant is an employee in one of the units of the ..... the complainant, she ought to have complained in the company before the committee constituted under the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 ( the act for short) when she was in employment. no such complaint was ever registered. after filing of the suit, criminal law is set in motion by ..... to the sexual harassment complaint. the employer is empowered to constitute the internal complaints committee under section 4 of the act and proceed with the enquiry and based on the report, initiate all further actions under the provisions of the act as well as under the service rules in force, more specifically, under the conduct and discipline .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Mr Amit Kalra Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... has been associated with the said company for over 18 years now. it is averred that it is one of the world s leading provider of insurance, re-insurance or insurance based risk transfer and has its presence across the world and headquartered at zurich. the complainant is an employee in one of the units of the ..... the complainant, she ought to have complained in the company before the committee constituted under the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 ( the act for short) when she was in employment. no such complaint was ever registered. after filing of the suit, criminal law is set in motion by ..... to the sexual harassment complaint. the employer is empowered to constitute the internal complaints committee under section 4 of the act and proceed with the enquiry and based on the report, initiate all further actions under the provisions of the act as well as under the service rules in force, more specifically, under the conduct and discipline .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Noel D Souza Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... has been associated with the said company for over 18 years now. it is averred that it is one of the world s leading provider of insurance, re-insurance or insurance based risk transfer and has its presence across the world and headquartered at zurich. the complainant is an employee in one of the units of the ..... the complainant, she ought to have complained in the company before the committee constituted under the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 ( the act for short) when she was in employment. no such complaint was ever registered. after filing of the suit, criminal law is set in motion by ..... to the sexual harassment complaint. the employer is empowered to constitute the internal complaints committee under section 4 of the act and proceed with the enquiry and based on the report, initiate all further actions under the provisions of the act as well as under the service rules in force, more specifically, under the conduct and discipline .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Ms. Maria Janet Mathias Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... has been associated with the said company for over 18 years now. it is averred that it is one of the world s leading provider of insurance, re-insurance or insurance based risk transfer and has its presence across the world and headquartered at zurich. the complainant is an employee in one of the units of the ..... the complainant, she ought to have complained in the company before the committee constituted under the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 ( the act for short) when she was in employment. no such complaint was ever registered. after filing of the suit, criminal law is set in motion by ..... to the sexual harassment complaint. the employer is empowered to constitute the internal complaints committee under section 4 of the act and proceed with the enquiry and based on the report, initiate all further actions under the provisions of the act as well as under the service rules in force, more specifically, under the conduct and discipline .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2024 (HC)

Captain Mr Arun P Nayar Vs. State By Jeevan Bheemanagar Police Station

Court : Karnataka

..... has been associated with the said company for over 18 years now. it is averred that it is one of the world s leading provider of insurance, re-insurance or insurance based risk transfer and has its presence across the world and headquartered at zurich. the complainant is an employee in one of the units of the ..... the complainant, she ought to have complained in the company before the committee constituted under the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 ( the act for short) when she was in employment. no such complaint was ever registered. after filing of the suit, criminal law is set in motion by ..... to the sexual harassment complaint. the employer is empowered to constitute the internal complaints committee under section 4 of the act and proceed with the enquiry and based on the report, initiate all further actions under the provisions of the act as well as under the service rules in force, more specifically, under the conduct and discipline .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2024 (SC)

Dlf Ltd. (formerly Known As Dlf Universal Ltd.) Vs. Koncar Generators ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... both of them, the award holders were foreign companies. however, in this case, the claimants seeking compensation were residing in india. further, like in motor 45 see united india insurance co. ltd v. patricia jean mahajan, (2002) 6 scc281 jiju kuruvila v. kunjujamma mohan, (2013) 9 scc166 46 (2021) 19 scc214 25 accident cases, it ..... are indian companies and the respondent is a croatian company. the parties entered a contract for the design, engineering, manufacturing, and 1 1984 supp scc263 2 hereinafter the act . 3 1994 supp (1) scc644 2 supply of two generators by the respondent. certain disputes arose between them that were referred to arbitration before the international chamber ..... enforcement of the judgment in terms of sterling pound. while jugoslavenska (supra) was not expressly overruled by the house of lords, its correctness was doubted. 5.4 the court held that there is no bar on courts in india to pass a decree for a sum expressed in foreign currency. however, for the purpose of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2024 (HC)

Santhosh K S Vs. Dilip Kumar H

Court : Karnataka

..... about68years r/o asandi village kadur taluk, chikkamagaluru district, pin code - 577 548.-. 2 - nc:2024. khc:31675 mfa no.5265 of 2021 3. the manager iffco tokia general insurance co. ltd., shashikiran building, 1st floor, shankar mutt road, shivamogga - 577 201. respondents (by sri. d. vijayakumar, advocate for r3 (vc); v/o. dated0808.2024, notice ..... to r1 and r2 dispensed with) this mfa is filed u/s1731) of mv act against the judgment and award dated0203.2021 passed in mvc no.294/2018 on the file of the senior civil judge and mact, chikkamgalur district, kadur, partly allowing the claim ..... respect of whole body would be 18%. though learned counsel sri.prakasha.h.c. submits that the tribunal has not assessed disability properly, yet, having considered the - 4 - nc:2024. khc:31675 mfa no.5265 of 2021 nature of the injuries sustained, this court is of the view that the disability as assessed by the tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2024 (SC)

K. Arumugam Etc. Etc. Vs. Union Of India And Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... tickets can be categorized as actionable claims. the relevant paragraphs of the said judgment read as under: 40. an actionable claim would include a right to recover insurance money or a partner's right to sue for an account of a dissolved partnership or the right to claim the benefit of a contract not coupled with ..... .2008. the appellant in this case was appointed as the exclusive statutory marketing agent by the state of sikkim on 24.08.2001, under section 4(c) of the lotteries regulation act, 1998, for the sale of online lottery tickets organized by the said state. according to the agreement between the appellant and the state of sikkim ..... palakkad-1, kerala, to obtain registration and pay page 2 of 25 service tax under the heading 'business auxiliary service' in terms of the provisions of the finance act, 1994. subsequently, the appellants were served notices by the assistant commissioner of central excise demanding details of their lottery purchase since the year 2003. in some instances, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //