Court : Kerala
..... applicant is a newspaper establishment covered under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 ('the act' for short). as per notices dated 28.3.2007 and 29.5.2007, the employees of the employees' state insurance corporation ('the corporation' for short), claimed contributions payable by the applicant under the act in respect of a few of its employees. it was ..... the ins.appeal no.53/2010. 3 said workers can only be regarded as persons engaged for works which are incidental to the purpose of the establishment.4. the evidence in the case consists of the oral testimony of aw1 and exts.a1 to a46 on the side of the applicant and the oral testimony ..... 020.3. vijeeshmon p.(viju.p.),pulikkancheri house, post attasseri, sreekrishnapuram (via), palakkad - 679 513.4. dhaneesh m.b., dhanasree, p.o. naikkatty, sulthan bathery,wayanad - 673 592. r1 & r2 by adv. sri.t.v.ajayakumar, sc. this insurance appeal having been finally heard on2306-2015, along with co. no. 62 of2011 the court on2407/2015 delivered .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... applicant is a newspaper establishment covered under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 ('the act' for short). as per notices dated 28.3.2007 and 29.5.2007, the employees of the employees' state insurance corporation ('the corporation' for short), claimed contributions payable by the applicant under the act in respect of a few of its employees. it was ..... the ins.appeal no.53/2010. 3 said workers can only be regarded as persons engaged for works which are incidental to the purpose of the establishment.4. the evidence in the case consists of the oral testimony of aw1 and exts.a1 to a46 on the side of the applicant and the oral testimony ..... 020.3. vijeeshmon p.(viju.p.),pulikkancheri house, post attasseri, sreekrishnapuram (via), palakkad - 679 513.4. dhaneesh m.b., dhanasree, p.o. naikkatty, sulthan bathery,wayanad - 673 592. r1 & r2 by adv. sri.t.v.ajayakumar, sc. this insurance appeal having been finally heard on2306-2015, along with co. no. 62 of2011 the court on2407/2015 delivered .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... applicant is a newspaper establishment covered under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 ('the act' for short). as per notices dated 28.3.2007 and 29.5.2007, the employees of the employees' state insurance corporation ('the corporation' for short), claimed contributions payable by the applicant under the act in respect of a few of its employees. it was ..... the ins.appeal no.53/2010. 3 said workers can only be regarded as persons engaged for works which are incidental to the purpose of the establishment.4. the evidence in the case consists of the oral testimony of aw1 and exts.a1 to a46 on the side of the applicant and the oral testimony ..... 020.3. vijeeshmon p.(viju.p.),pulikkancheri house, post attasseri, sreekrishnapuram (via), palakkad - 679 513.4. dhaneesh m.b., dhanasree, p.o. naikkatty, sulthan bathery,wayanad - 673 592. r1 & r2 by adv. sri.t.v.ajayakumar, sc. this insurance appeal having been finally heard on2306-2015, along with co. no. 62 of2011 the court on2407/2015 delivered .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... applicant is a newspaper establishment covered under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 ('the act' for short). as per notices dated 28.3.2007 and 29.5.2007, the employees of the employees' state insurance corporation ('the corporation' for short), claimed contributions payable by the applicant under the act in respect of a few of its employees. it was ..... the ins.appeal no.53/2010. 3 said workers can only be regarded as persons engaged for works which are incidental to the purpose of the establishment.4. the evidence in the case consists of the oral testimony of aw1 and exts.a1 to a46 on the side of the applicant and the oral testimony ..... 020.3. vijeeshmon p.(viju.p.),pulikkancheri house, post attasseri, sreekrishnapuram (via), palakkad - 679 513.4. dhaneesh m.b., dhanasree, p.o. naikkatty, sulthan bathery,wayanad - 673 592. r1 & r2 by adv. sri.t.v.ajayakumar, sc. this insurance appeal having been finally heard on2306-2015, along with co. no. 62 of2011 the court on2407/2015 delivered .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... applicant is a newspaper establishment covered under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 ('the act' for short). as per notices dated 28.3.2007 and 29.5.2007, the employees of the employees' state insurance corporation ('the corporation' for short), claimed contributions payable by the applicant under the act in respect of a few of its employees. it was ..... the ins.appeal no.53/2010. 3 said workers can only be regarded as persons engaged for works which are incidental to the purpose of the establishment.4. the evidence in the case consists of the oral testimony of aw1 and exts.a1 to a46 on the side of the applicant and the oral testimony ..... 020.3. vijeeshmon p.(viju.p.),pulikkancheri house, post attasseri, sreekrishnapuram (via), palakkad - 679 513.4. dhaneesh m.b., dhanasree, p.o. naikkatty, sulthan bathery,wayanad - 673 592. r1 & r2 by adv. sri.t.v.ajayakumar, sc. this insurance appeal having been finally heard on2306-2015, along with co. no. 62 of2011 the court on2407/2015 delivered .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... applicant is a newspaper establishment covered under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 ('the act' for short). as per notices dated 28.3.2007 and 29.5.2007, the employees of the employees' state insurance corporation ('the corporation' for short), claimed contributions payable by the applicant under the act in respect of a few of its employees. it was ..... the ins.appeal no.53/2010. 3 said workers can only be regarded as persons engaged for works which are incidental to the purpose of the establishment.4. the evidence in the case consists of the oral testimony of aw1 and exts.a1 to a46 on the side of the applicant and the oral testimony ..... 020.3. vijeeshmon p.(viju.p.),pulikkancheri house, post attasseri, sreekrishnapuram (via), palakkad - 679 513.4. dhaneesh m.b., dhanasree, p.o. naikkatty, sulthan bathery,wayanad - 673 592. r1 & r2 by adv. sri.t.v.ajayakumar, sc. this insurance appeal having been finally heard on2306-2015, along with co. no. 62 of2011 the court on2407/2015 delivered .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... applicant is a newspaper establishment covered under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 ('the act' for short). as per notices dated 28.3.2007 and 29.5.2007, the employees of the employees' state insurance corporation ('the corporation' for short), claimed contributions payable by the applicant under the act in respect of a few of its employees. it was ..... the ins.appeal no.53/2010. 3 said workers can only be regarded as persons engaged for works which are incidental to the purpose of the establishment.4. the evidence in the case consists of the oral testimony of aw1 and exts.a1 to a46 on the side of the applicant and the oral testimony ..... 020.3. vijeeshmon p.(viju.p.),pulikkancheri house, post attasseri, sreekrishnapuram (via), palakkad - 679 513.4. dhaneesh m.b., dhanasree, p.o. naikkatty, sulthan bathery,wayanad - 673 592. r1 & r2 by adv. sri.t.v.ajayakumar, sc. this insurance appeal having been finally heard on2306-2015, along with co. no. 62 of2011 the court on2407/2015 delivered .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the letter, annexue-c dated 25.5.2016 which is in relation to initiation of recovery proceeding under section 45 c to 45 i of the esic act, 1948 addressed by the assistant director of the corporation to recovery officer with copy to the petitioner and other partners. according to him, the ..... the lack of service upon petitioner of the letters dated 20.7.2015, annexure-a -4- series and the order of assessment dated 17.8.2015, annexure-b series passed under section 45 a of the esic act, 1948 by referring to the extract of the dispatch register and the receipts of the ..... secretary, dept. of labour, employment & training, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi 2. employees state insurance corporation through the regional director, regional office, esic namkum, ranchi 3. deputy director, esic regional office, namkum, ranchi 4. assistant director, esic regional office, namkum, ranchi 5. recovery officer, esic regional office, namkum, ranchi ..... respondents .... coram: hon ble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... account of premiums. none of these was done for or on behalf of the insurer. the undisputed circumstantial facts require the conclusion that the employer acted not as agent of the insurer, but for and on behalf of petitioner and other insured employees and in its own interest. [ footnote 9 ] 4. petitioner cites articles 5054 and 5056, revised civil statutes, as opposed to the lower ..... court's ruling: "if employees in texas desire to join in an insurance plan about to be set up .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... , concurring in the judgment. the court correctly concludes that 20 111.1(d) of the virginia code (section d) is pre-empted by the federal employees group life insurance act of 1954 (feglia), 5 u. s. c. 8701 et seq. but i cannot join the purposes and objectives framework that the majority uses to reach this conclusion. ..... congress unqualified directive that the proceeds accrue to a named beneficiary. ridgway, 454 u. s., at 57. 4 in his concurrence, justice alito argues that one of feglia s purposes is to effectuat[e] . . . the insured s expressed intent and that evidence beyond an employee s named beneficiary could therefore be relevant in some circumstances to ..... an employee s will is more reliable evidence of his intent than a beneficiary designation form executed years earlier. but that is not the judgment congress made. [ 4 ] rather than draw an inference about an employee s probable intent from a range of sources, congress established a clear and predictable procedure for an employee to .....
Tag this Judgment!