Court : Meghalaya State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shillong
..... to give satisfactory reasons for not accepting the report of the first surveyor and the need to appoint second surveyor. 23) section 64 um(2) of the insurance act, 1938, reads that no claim in respect of a loss which has occurred in india and requiring to be paid or settled in india equal to or exceeding twenty ..... in the said policy is justified or is it in accordance with the terms and conditions of the insurance policy (iv) whether the loss sustained in the accident by the complainant is proper and legitimate in nature (v) whether the opposite party (insurance company) is duty bound to make payment as per the scheme of the policy and as per ..... in submitting the reports by the surveyor. however, the surveyor found some discrepancies in the documents submitted by the complainant. this has some relevance to suggested issue no (iv) and that is why the surveyor re assessed the loss and submitted a revised final report. they have accepted the surveyors revised assessment of loss at rs. 6,61 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Meghalaya State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shillong
..... emotional aspect of it cannot be. it depends upon her educational qualification, her own upbringing, status, husband's income, etc." arun kumar agarwal vs. national insurance company (2010) 9 scc 218, paras 23 and 24 : in india the courts have recognised that the contribution made by the wife to the house is ..... , stated that the complaint is wholly misconceived, frivolous and vexatious and liable to be dismissed with cost under section 26 of the consumer protection act,1986 (cp act in short). the opposite parties have also raised the question of maintainability of the complaint petition due to mis-joinder of parties and lack of ..... the complainant brought an allegation that the doctor concerned was not authorized to practice medicine and due to his treatment, respondents fractured arm was damaged permanently. (4) vinitha ashok vs lakshmi hospital; (2001) 8 scc 731 in which the appellant alleged medical negligence against the hospital where a complicated operation known as hysterectomy .....
Tag this Judgment!