Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insurance act 1938 4 of 1938 section 10 separation of accounts and funds Page 4 of about 1,365 results (0.266 seconds)

Dec 09 2014 (HC)

Indian Medical Association Vs. Ministry of Labour and Employmentand An ...

Court : Delhi

..... accepting a nominee of the petitioner for being appointed as one of the member representing the medical profession as a constituent of esic. however, a plain reading of section 4(h) of the esi act does not suggest that the petitioner or any other organization of medical practitioners has been provided any right of nomination. the mandate ..... tripathi, the learned senior counsel, appearing for respondent no.2 contended that section 13(c) of the esi act applies to all members of esic and not just medical professionals appointed pursuant to section 4(h) of the esi act. it was contended that an engagement as a medical practitioner was excluded from the rigor of disqualification as ..... the controversy are as under:3. 1 the term of esic expired on 08.05.2012 and respondent no.1 commenced the process to reconstitute esic in terms of section 4 of the esi act. 3.2 in terms of section 4(h) of the esi act, the constitution of esic includes two members from the medical profession. respondent no.1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2011 (HC)

The U.P. Motor Transport Association, Kanpur Vs. the Chairman, I.R.D.A ...

Court : Allahabad

..... 15.4.2011. we have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. to consolidate the law relating to business of insurance the insurance act, 1938 was enacted by the insurance (amendment) act, 1968. the insurance act, 1938 was amended by adding part ii and iii in the insurance act, 1938. section 64uc provided for power of the insurance advisory ..... it is not the case of the petitioner that tariff advisory committee has issued any order prescribing rates. the provision of insurance act 1938 and the insurance regulatory and development authority act 1999 have to be to given effect together and when the committee has not issued any orders covering the field which has ..... to motor third party liability insurance has been notified with effect from 25.4.2011. the notification dated 15.4.2011 has been issued in supersession of earlier notification dated 23.1.2007. the petitioner's case in the writ petition is that under section 64uc of insurance act, 1938, the power to control .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2011 (HC)

The Management of Best and Crompton Engineering Limited Vs. A.M.Sekar ...

Court : Chennai

..... have dispensed with the services of the employee by giving notice as per the terms of the appointment, the compensation package has been offered. 11.4. it was also stated that section 2(oo) of the act is not applicable and therefore, there is no question of giving any opportunity to the employee. it is also stated that section 25-n ..... have dispensed with the services of the employee by giving notice as per the terms of the appointment, the compensation package has been offered. 13.4. it was also stated that section 2(oo) of the act is not applicable and therefore, there is no question of giving any opportunity to the employee. it is also stated that section 25-n ..... dispensed with the services of the employee by giving notice as per the terms of the appointment, the compensation package has been offered. 15.4. it was also stated that section 2(oo) of the act is not applicable and therefore, there is no question of giving any opportunity to the employee. it is also stated that section 25-n .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1991 (HC)

Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board Engineers Association Etc. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1991)IILLJ394Mad; (1993)IIMLJ540

..... india or any financial corporation established under section 3 or any joint financial corporation established under section 3a of the state financial corporation act, the deposit insurance corporation, the agricultural refinance corporation, the unit trust of india, the industrial development bank of india and any other financial institution ..... b) any financial corporation established under section 3, or any joint financial corporation established under section 3 of the state financial corporations act, 1951 (63 of 1951). (c) the deposit insurance corporation; (d) the agricultural refinance corporation; (e) the unit trust of india; (f) the industrial development bank of india ..... insurance corporation of india; (ii) seamen as defined in clause (42) of section 3 of the merchant shipping act, 1958 (44 of 1958) : (iii) employees registered or listed under any scheme made under the dock workers (regulations of employment) act, 1948 (9 to 1948) and employed by registered or listed employers; (iv) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1999 (HC)

Lakshmi Aachi and Another Vs. Parvathi Achi (Died) Alagappa Chettiar ( ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC40; (1999)IIMLJ433

..... defendants one and two. first defendant admitted the execution of the mortgage deed and contended that she is entitled to the benefits of the tamil nadu act 4 of 1938 as amended by act 31 of 1976 and act 40 of 1978. whereas the second defendant disputed the truth and validity of the mortgage deed, and submitted that he is entitled to half share ..... though the mortgage deed was true, is not binding on the second defendant and that the first defendant is entitled to the benefit of tamil nadu act 4 of 1938 as amended by act 31 of 1976 and act 40 of 1978. holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to recovery any amount, the suit was dismissed.5. the plaintiff preferred an appeal. on ..... appeal it was held that the first defendant was not entitled to the benefits of act 4 of 1938 as amended by act 8 of 1973 as she was not an agriculturist on the date of borrowing of the amount viz. 30.5.1960 and the appeal was allowed in part .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2004 (HC)

Suresh Prasad Jaiswal and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... 45(2) of the esi act, principal employers are required to produce the relevant records including ledger, cash book and vouchers relating to their factory ..... against the petitioners is that they failed to produce the records on demand by the insurance inspector at the time of inspection of the factory premises at chirkunda in dhanbad district and thereby committed offence under section 85(g) of the employees' state insurance act, 1948 (in short 'the insurance act').4. the relevant part of the complaint may usefully be quoted as under : 'under section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1964 (SC)

New Asiatic Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pessumal Dhanamal Aswani and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1736; (1964)66BOMLR702; 1965MHLJ257(SC); [1964]7SCR867

..... interest. murli instituted suit no. 71 of 1959 against pessumal to recover rs. 1,50,000/- by way of damages. 4. notices under s. 96(2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939 (act iv of 1939), hereinafter called the act, were issued to the new asiatic insurance co. ltd. the notice was given to the company as the defendant's liability to third parties had been ..... insured with it under its policy no. mv/4564. the company then took out chamber summons and it was contended that notice .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 1972 (SC)

The Neptune Assurance Co. Ltd., and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC602; [1973]43CompCas469(SC); (1973)1SCC310; [1973]2SCR940

..... but does not include capital redemption business and annuity business. an insurer under the act means an insurer. as defined in the insurance act 1938 referred to as the insurance act who carries on general insurance business in india, and includes an insurer whose registration under the insurance act has not remained wholly cancelled for a period of six months immediately ..... corporation ltd. canceling all re-insurance treaties with effect from 31 december 1970. the company alleged ..... .98. on 16 february 1971 the controller of insurance affected cancellation of the registration of the company with effect from 5 april 1971 under section 3(4)(f) of the insurance act, 1938. on 22 february 1971 the company gave letters to indian guarantee and general insurance co. and m/s india re-insu- rance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2003 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Madho Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2005ACJ1653; AIR2004Raj131

..... virtue of the provisions of section 13 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), conclusive as to any matter adjudicated upon by it, the insurer (being an insurer registered under the insurance act, 1938 (4 of 1938), and whether or not he is registered under the corresponding law of the reciprocating country) shall be liable to the person entitled to the benefit of the ..... virtue of the provisions of section 13 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) conclusive as to any matter adjudicated upon by it, the insurer (being an insurer registered under the insurance act, 1938 of the reciprocating country) shall be liable to the person entitled to the benefit of the decree in the manner and to the extent specified in sub-section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2004 (HC)

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. K. Uttam Chand JaIn and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR635]; ILR2005KAR66; 2004(7)KarLJ627; (2005)ILLJ767Kant

..... j.1. this appeal is filed by the esi corporation assailing the judgment of acquittal of the accused for the offence punishable under section 85(a) of the employees state insurance act, 1948 by the special court for economic offences, bangalore in c.c.no. 608/1994 dated 29.6.1998. the brief fact are as follows:the respondents are carrying on ..... as may be specified in the regulations made in this behalf.'it provides for registration of any factory or establishment which comes within the purview of the esi act.14. section 39(4) reads thus:'39(4). the contributions payable in respect of which on the last day of the [wage period], and where an employee is employed for part of the [wage ..... examination, he has admitted that they have not mentioned in ex.p5 the amount payable by the accused towards contribution. however, he stated that the notice was served on a-4 as per ex.p.12. it is also in his evidence, before passing the order under section 45-a, they have served notice c-18.8. pw.3 mahaboob .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //