Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: institutes of technology amendment act 2002 section 4 amendment of section 4 Sorted by: old Court: chennai Page 66 of about 708 results (0.654 seconds)

Apr 20 2016 (HC)

P. Ramu Vs. The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, High Court, Chen ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... 19. many persons are said to have entered into the profession for the past 15 years, having obtained degrees fraudulently viz. procuring law degrees, in absentia, in the institutions, which are hundreds of kilometres away from their work place, while rendering service in their organisation as full-time employees. therefore, the bar council of india is directed ..... dealt with under chapter iii of the act. section 24 of the act speaks about persons, who may be admitted as an advocate on a state roll. by amendment, section 24-a (disqualification for enrolment) was introduced in the act. under section 28 of the act, a state bar council has got powers to make rules ..... ' act, 1961. 4. learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3 opposed the claim of the petitioner. the advocates' act, 1961, was passed by the parliament to amend and to consolidate the law relating to legal practitioners and to provide for the constitution of bar councils and all-india bar, to implement the recommendations of all-india bar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2016 (HC)

Jeevana School Vs. The Commissioner, Madurai Municipal Corporation and ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... when admittely the petitioner school situates within the municipal corporation, they are liable to pay the property tax without protest. further, the petitioner school is not philanthropic institution when they charge fee from the students in a different form and therefore, their request that they are exempted from paying property tax cannot be sustained in the ..... rely upon the full bench decision of this court reported in 2009 (5) ctc 289, the president, k.vellakulam panchayat vs. kamaraj college of engineering and technology for the proposition regarding the levy of property tax to all the schools and colleges in the village panchayat. even when the schools or colleges which are situated in ..... m.l.j., the r.c.diocese of madurai vs. madurai city municipal corporation, which case arise out of the exemption granted under section 122 (c) as amended by act 42 of 1994, that was the case which is a church as well as seminary where a building which was utilised, whether it was within the purview .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2016 (HC)

Emperuman and Others Vs. Rangarajan and Others

Court : Chennai

..... court and that refusal to extend such time would cause grave injustice to the plaintiff. 14. the above proviso to rule 11 of order 7 has been inserted by cpc (amendment) act 104 of 1976, s.57. (w.e.f. 1.2.1977). 15. insofar as this second appeal is concerned, clauses 'b', and 'd', of rule 11 are very much ..... law; (e) where it is not filed in duplicate; (f) where the plaintiff fails to comply with the provisions of rule 9. (clause 'e' has been inserted by the cpc (amendment) act, 1999 (46 of 1999), s.17 (w.e.f. 1.7.2002) vide notfn.s.o.603 (e), dt.6.6.2002). (clause 'f' has been substituted by cpc ..... (amendment) act, 2002 (22 of 2002), section 8 (w.e.f.1.7.2002) vide notfn.s.o.604 (e), dt.6.6.2002, section 8 (ii) for clauses (f) and ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2016 (HC)

N. Marappan and Another Vs. V.S.T. Sengottaian and Others

Court : Chennai

..... firms as a partner in the firm : provided that the requirement of registration of firm under this sub-section shall not apply to the suits or proceedings instituted by the heirs or legal representatives of the deceased partner of a firm for accounts of a dissolved firm or to realise the property of a dissolved firm ..... chargeable with highest of such duties. article 45 deals with partition simpliciter. a deed of dissolution involving partition of immovable properties squarely falls under article 46b. after amendment of article 46 by substitution of new sub clause (b) with effect from 01.07.1982. the earlier judgments of the madras high court in secretary, ..... of dissolution of partnership if it involved partition by virtue of section 6 it would attract higher stamp duty applicable for partition under article 45. after amendment dissolution involving partition of immovable properties of a firm among partners has been separately itemised and the stamp duty leviable at a higher rate on the entire .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 2016 (HC)

S. Saibullahkhan Vs. Hairunisha Beevi and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... 70,000/- and the same was not questioned by the original defendants 1 and 2. it is further contended that once the amendment application is allowed, it relates back to the institution of the suit and therefore, the petitioner cannot ask for payment of the court fee based on the market value in the year ..... by the first respondent by filing a detailed counter. 6. the learned subordinate judge, ramanathapuram dismissed the application holding that once amendment is allowed, it relates back to the date of institution of the suit, by relying on the judgment of the honourable supreme court in sampath kumar vs . ayyakannuandan other reported in air ..... the present application. 11. the learned subordinate judge, ramanathapuram dismissed the application holding that the amendment would relate back to the institution of the suit and the petitioner cannot ask to value the suit property on the date of amendment of the plaint. the division bench of this court has categorically held that after commencement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2016 (HC)

R. Gowrishankar Vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals)-I, Chenn ...

Court : Chennai

..... it is capable of removing injustice and is expected to do so. making a justice-oriented approach from this perspective, there was sufficient cause for condoning the delay in the institution of the appeal. the fact that it was the 'state' which was seeking condonation and not a private party was altogether irrelevant. the doctrine of equality before law demands ..... satisfied that the dealer had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the prescribed period of 30 days subject to the payment of the admitted tax due. under the amended provision, the delay can only be condoned up to a further period of 30 days. " 14. in a recent judgment, the supreme court of india, in union of ..... -38, a petition can be preferred to the high court within 90 days from the date of which copy of the order is served. by virtue of the 8th amendment act 1986 which came into effect on 15/12/1986, the high court may within a further period of forty-five days, admit a petition preferred after the expiration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 2016 (HC)

M/s. Sun TV Network Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director K. Vija ...

Court : Chennai

..... to be judged by degree, for corruption mothers disorder, destroys societal will to progress, accelerates undeserved ambitions, kills the conscience, jettisons the glory of the institutions, paralyses the economic health of a country, corrodes the sense of civility and mars the marrows of governance. it is worth noting that immoral acquisition of ..... only two places where the petitioner has his place of business. 10. in view of the facts mentioned in the supplementary affidavit, read with information technology act, the acceptance having been received by the petitioner at chandauli/varanasi, the contract became complete by receipt of such acceptance at varanasi/chandauli, both of ..... the writ petition. for answering the said question we would like to consider the provision of article 226 of the constitution as it stood prior to amendment. originally, article 226 of the constitution reads as under: 226. power of high courts to issue certain writs.--(1) notwithstanding anything in article 32, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2016 (HC)

M/s. Falcon Types Ltd., Rep., by its Authorised Signatory, Chander Kot ...

Court : Chennai

..... a like nature. explanation- for the purpose of this section, - a. in excluding the time during which a former civil proceeding was pending, the day on which that proceeding was instituted and the day on which it ended shall both be counted; b. a plaintiff or an applicant resisting an appeal shall be c. deemed to be prosecuting a proceeding; d ..... satisfied that the dealer had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the prescribed period of 30 days subject to the payment of the admitted tax due. under the amended provision, the delay can only be condoned up to a further period of 30 days." 14. in a recent judgment, the supreme court of india, in union of india v ..... section-38, a petition can be preferred to the high court within 90 days from the date of which copy of the order is served. by virtue of the 8th amendment act 1986 which came into effect on 15/12/1986, the high court may within a further period of forty-five days, admit a petition preferred after the expiration of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 2016 (HC)

K. Ravichandran Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram and O ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... redemption within 30 years from the date of the mortgage. section 27 of the limitation act provides that at the determination of the period hereby limited to any person for instituting a suit for possession of any property, his right to such property shall be extinguished . this would mean that on the expiry of the period of limitation prescribed under the ..... , for a declaration of his rights under chapter vi of the specific relief act, 1963 (central act 47 of 1963); and the entry in the patta pass-book shall be amended in accordance with any such declaration." 9.7. it is to be relevantly pointed out that the mortgagor, in indian law, is a person, who had parted with some rights ..... government in respect of a claim to have an entry made in any patta pass-book that is maintained under this act or to have any such entry omitted or amended', yet, the said section also enjoins as follows: "provided that if any person is aggrieved as to any right of which he is in possession, by an entry made in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

The Correspondent, St. Aloysius Middle School, Tirunelveli District Vs ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... per this government order, this roster cannot be changed in future. it is pertinent to mention that it was subsequently mentioned therein that steps would be taken for making necessary amendments to the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) rules, 1974, indicating that the government order is only an administrative instruction and that the terms of the government order would be ..... that g.o.ms.no.144, school education (d1) department, dated 04.07.2008, does not preclude the appointment of bt teachers; (ii) that the petitioner school, being a minority institution, could not be compelled to fill up the posts by way of promotion since rule 15(4) would not apply to a minority ..... institution; (iii) that sufficient qualified teachers are working in the school to teach other subjects and that the surplus secondary grade teachers cannot be appointed against the present post which had .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //