Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: institutes of technology amendment act 2002 section 4 amendment of section 4 Court: chennai Page 1 of about 708 results (0.142 seconds)

N.V. Rengasamy. Vs. the Director of Technical Education, and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... he was applied for b.e. engineering course and the 1st respondent provisionally selected the petitioner for admission and allotted him to thanthai periyar government institute of technology, vellore. the petitioner produced the community certificate before the principal. however, the principal made an endorsement dated 3.8.1992 stating that the community ..... upto 11.11.1989 is valid". however, when the petitioner was given provisional admission for the academic year 1992-93 in thanthai periyar government institute of technology, vellore, he was directed to produce the community certificate signed by the revenue divisional officer. therefore, he had applied to the 3nd respondent ..... petitioner.2. the petitioner claims that he belongs to hindu kattunaicken community which is a recognised scheduled tribe as per scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (amendment) act 1976. the particulars relating to his community has been entered into his s.s.l.c.book, transfer certificate and in school records. .....

V. Subramanian and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ349

..... i. the following departments of the university of madras, located in the alagappa chettiar college of technology, guindy, madras, namely :- (1) chemical technology ; (2) leather technology ; (3) textile technology ; (4) the school of architecture and town planning. ii. the madras institute of technology, chrompet,madras.' 2. the services of the appellants herein, who were ministerial employees of the ..... in section 36 of the act 30 of 1978, after it was amended by act 44 of 1979, was per se illegal and unconstitutional. it was also their case that they were not employees of any of the departments or institutions mentioned in schedule-i of the act, and, therefore, the act, ..... by section 36 of that act, the services of the employees in the institutions and departments mentioned in schedule-i to that act were transferred to the new university provided such employees consented for such transfer. by a retrospective amendment to that act effected by act 44 of 1979, the consent was dispensed .....

Association of Management of Private Colleges Represented by Its Presi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ1162

..... , as a unitary university, on 4th of september, 1978, catering to engineering and technology. the amendment act of 2001 made it an affiliating university for the engineering colleges in chennai. it integrated 4 well known technical institutions in the city of chennai, the oldest of which was the college of engineering, ..... guindy, started in the year, 1974. the anna university was originally called as perarignar anna university of technology ..... deem fit.2. to provide for research and for the advancement and dissemination of knowledge in engineering, technology and allied sciences.3. to institute degrees, titles, diplomas and other academic distinctions in engineering, technology and allied sciences.16. further, section 5(1) of the act empowers the first respondent university .....

S. Murugan Vs. the Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, ...

Court : Chennai

..... graduates in public health; (4) graduates in pharmacy; (5) graduates in veterinary science; (6) graduates in food technology; (7) graduates in technology; (8) diploma holders in food technology or dairy technology from a university or institution established in india by law; (9) any other person having equivalent qualifications recognised and notified by the central government for ..... ) to (c) of rule 8. those two provisos deal with appointments as food inspectors made prior to the commencement of food adulteration (amendment) rules 1980 and appointments that could have been made before 31st march 1985. we are not concerned with those provisos which are exceptions to the ..... third proviso is to the effect that those persons, who had already been appointed as food inspectors before the commencement of the prevention of food adulteration (amendment) rules, 1980, could continue as such after such commencement, even though they did not possess any one of the qualifications prescribed in clauses (a .....

Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research Vs. the University ...

Court : Chennai

..... , frs, chairman, naac and former vice chancellor, hyderabad central university, (iii) prof. anandakrishnan, former vice chancellor, anna university and presently chairman of the indian institute of technology, kanpur, and (iv) prof. mrinal miri, former vice chancellor, north eastern hill university, shillong and former chairman, indian council of philosophical research, new delhi ..... force from time to time by the respondents 1 to 3. the 1st respondent has amended the ugc guidelines,2000, on institutions deemed to be universities and the said guidelines have been replaced by "ugc (institutions deemed to be universities) regulations, 2010", which have come into force with effect from ..... by the 1st respondent or by the 2nd and 3rd respondents. the 1st respondent has amended the ugc guidelines (2000) on institutions deemed to be universities and the said guidelines have been replaced by "ugc (institutions deemed to be universities) regulations, 2010", which have come into force with effect from .....

G.V. Sampath Vs. M/s. Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore and Oth ...

Court : Chennai

..... second respondent therein, viz., university grants commission, had also filed a counter statement and in paragraph no.10, it is stated that the vellore institute of technology deemed to be university has been placed in category b by an expert review committee constituted by the government of india, ministry of human resource ..... the basis of the alleged meeting of respondents/defendants 2 to 8 of the first defendant trust removing the appellant/plaintiff from the trusteeship of vellore institute of technology trust, as null and void, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of principles and natural justice; b) permanent injunction restraining the respondents 2 ..... technology along with four vice presidents viz., mr.sankar viswanathan, the third defendant/third respondent, g.v.sampath, mr.sekar viswanathn, the fourth respondent/fourth defendant and g.v.selvam, the fifth respondent/fifth defendant. 25. clause 3(2) of amendments to trust deed contains the procedure for removal of trustees. it .....

Bharathidasan University, Palkalai Perur, Tiruchirapalli Rep. by Its R ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC236; (2001)8SCC676; AIR2001SC2861

..... of 1998. the syndicate of the university in its meeting held on 7.11.1997, resolved to approve in principle the establishment of bharathidasan institute of engineering and technology biet and initiate all the necessary action in that regard including forwarding the proposal to aicte/state government for approval and also provision of funds ..... financing college.12. shri. r. krishnamurthi, the learned senior counsel, in reply, submitted that the statutes of the university will be amended in course of time; starting of the technical institute by the university as its department is only the beginning. he submitted even though the validity of the regulations is not challenged, objections ..... did not take further steps and action pursuant to the said resolution. it is not shown to us that either the resolution of the syndicate was amended or rescinded subsequently, except making a submission in the course of the arguments that the university bona fidely thought that approval of the council was not .....

The Registrar, University of Madras, Chepauk, Madras - 600005 and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)IIMLJ367

..... of non-cooperation and refusal by the government of pondicherry to give a 'no objection' letter for receipt of the grant. the pant institute of technology was started in the year 1987 for giving education leading to grant of degrees in the three subjects mentioned earlier. the petitioner required affiliation ..... or having shown capacity in dealing with, problems relating to economics, law, commerce, accountancy, industry, public affairs or administration. in our opinion, this amendment has a significance inasmuch as it substitutes a person eminent in the field of education with a person well-versed in subjects connected with commercial activities. ..... . further, after the decision in bangalore water supply and sewerage board case : (1978)illj349sc , the parliament has passed the amendment act 46 of - excluding education, scientific, research or training institution from the definition of 'industry', making clear the intention of the legislature. but, the government has not chosen to notify the .....

The Registrar, University of Madras and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ367

..... account of non-cooperation and refusal by the government of pondicherry to give a no objection letter for receipt of the grant. the pant institute of technology was started in the year 1987 for giving education leading to grant of degrees in the three subjects mentioned earlier. the petitioner required affiliation ..... having shown capacity in dealing with, problems relating to economics, law, commerce, accountancy, industry, public affairs or administration. in our opinion, this amendment has a significance inasmuch as it substitutes a person eminent in the field of education with a person well versed in subjects connected with commercial activities. ..... further, after the decision in bangalore water supply and sewerage board case : (1978)illj312sc , the parliament has passed the amendment act no. 46 of 1982 excluding educations, scientific, research or training institutions from the definition of 'industry', making clear the intention of the legislatures. but, the government has not chosen to .....

Dilip Bhandari Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai and the Me ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(5)CTC481; (2005)1MLJ46

..... depicted even by the latest report filed before us on 28.04.2004, excepting certifying what the other experts have opined. there is no separate evaluation by indian institute of technology, madras. objections have been filed to the above report by municipal commissioner, cmda, as also the objector - mr.r.ramachandran, who is the neighbour and leading the association of the ..... the structures cannot be improved, so as to make the inhabitants to be inducted safe. during the pendency of the writ appeals a petition was filed permitting the indian institute of technology, madras to give expert opinion to make the constructions strong from bottom to top. but, there is no such improvement in the ..... so as to make it viable for occupation. the venture is commercial in nature and the writ is sought for to permit the owner and the builder to make some amends to the existing structure, so as to enable them to sell out the flats and enrich themselves. it is not a case of a person not having a house has .....