Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: institutes of technology amendment act 2002 section 4 amendment of section 4 Court: rajasthan Page 23 of about 227 results (0.764 seconds)

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Nagendra Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Raj. and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... a rational as the schemes are required to be implemented with a new vision of development and governance at the grass root level through the panchayat raj institutions as per thrust of the 73rd constitutional amendment and the state enactment -25- made in consonance thereto. the need of experience hands in service, thus, is rational and required. while adopting the reasonings given ..... sbcwp nos.9780, 10236 and 5583 of 2013). ..... by the court :(per hon'ble govind mathur,j.) reportable by 73rd amendment of the constitution of india, a constitutional status was conferred on panchayati raj institutions as the third stratum of governance. the amendment aforesaid was a landmark step to satisfy directives of the state -2- policy enshrined under the constitution. with an object .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2014 (HC)

Laxman Singh Rathore Vs. Raj. Agriculture University, Bkn. and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... petitioner. d/. writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed with costs. . 2. the petitioner was appointed as 'coach' (cricket) with the diploma from national institute of sports in cricket in rajasthan agricultural university, bikaner on 01.01.2009 in the pay scale of rs.5500-175- 9000. the controversy raised in the present writ petition ..... -appellants and the orders passed by the respondent- university. the appellant no.2 and 3 also submitted application subsequently on 19.8.2003 stating therein that application for amending in the order dated 25.9.2002 may be dismissed as they have settled their claims with the respondent.6. the appellant no.1 udai raj dhabi submitted an ..... that the effect of the order of the division bench is that the petitioners are entitled for the benefit from 5.12.1990 and in case the order is amended, the petitioners will be entitled for the benefit of payment from 1.4.1980 and it cannot submitted that appellants no.2 and 3 have received the payments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2015 (HC)

Kamla Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... 8 of the rules of 1996. it is pertinent to note here that the gallantry awards referred in sub-rule (1) of rule 2 of the rules are instituted by the president of india to acknowledge outstanding courage and bravery of the persons participating in war. participation of a person in a war is not dependent to the ..... to the nation recognised by his excellency the president of india by awarding them the 'police medal of the president for gallantry' and, if necessary, by suitably amending the rules of 1966, as already recommended by the colonisation commissioner in that behalf in the year 2007. this is because the implementation of the rules in the ..... any discipline. the state government was therefore directed to consider the case of the petitioner therein for allotment of land. 8. learned counsel for petitioners referred to the amendment made in the rules of 1966 vide notification dated 18.09.2002 and argued that the state government has now, by aforesaid notification, included the members of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2015 (HC)

Hilton Granite Ltd Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... area in contravention of the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 72, any officer of the uit empowered in this behalf in addition to any prosecution that may be instituted under the act for the improper use, may make an order requiring such person to stop such improper use immediately. sub-section (2) of section 91-b of the act ..... of the land as it was recorded in its name in the record of rights. the report also pointed out that so far as araji no.10 is concerned, the amendment was erroneously made, and it should have been made in arazi nos.9 & 10, jointly, and not in arazi no.10 alone. learned single judge was carried away by ..... the appellant that learned single judge has failed to appreciate that the settlement department had admitted that an error was committed by the revenue department in making amendment in arazi no.10 alone, whereas the amendment ought to have been made jointly in arazi nos.9 and 10. learned single judge also failed to appreciate that the uit, either in its reply .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2015 (HC)

Rockwood Hotels and Resorts Ltd Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... area in contravention of the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 72, any officer of the uit empowered in this behalf in addition to any prosecution that may be instituted under the act for the improper use, may make an order requiring such person to stop such improper use immediately. sub-section (2) of section 91-b of the act ..... of the land as it was recorded in its name in the record of rights. the report also pointed out that so far as araji no.10 is concerned, the amendment was erroneously made, and it should have been made in arazi nos.9 & 10, jointly, and not in arazi no.10 alone. learned single judge was carried away by ..... the appellant that learned single judge has failed to appreciate that the settlement department had admitted that an error was committed by the revenue department in making amendment in arazi no.10 alone, whereas the amendment ought to have been made jointly in arazi nos.9 and 10. learned single judge also failed to appreciate that the uit, either in its reply .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2013 (HC)

Pankaj Bhatnagar Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi @ Pappi and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... to deal with a broken marriage. under the fault theory, guilt has to be proved; divorce courts are presented concrete instances of human behaviour as bring the institution of marriage into disrepute.78. we have been principally impressed by the consideration that once the marriage has broken down beyond repair, it would be unrealistic for the ..... it decline to give adequate response to the necessities arising therefrom. the apex court has further gone to the extent of recommending union of india to bring an amendment in the act of 1955 for incorporating the said ground as ground for divorce. the court, ultimately, made following observations in para 96 of the verdict:96. ..... have also expressed their apprehension for introduction of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a ground for grant of the decree of divorce. in their opinion, such an amendment in the act would put human ingenuity at a premium and throw wide open the doors to litigation, and will create more problems then are sought to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2013 (HC)

Smt. Shanti Devi Vs. Pankaj

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... to deal with a broken marriage. under the fault theory, guilt has to be proved; divorce courts are presented concrete instances of human behaviour as bring the institution of marriage into disrepute.78. we have been principally impressed by the consideration that once the marriage has broken down beyond repair, it would be unrealistic for the ..... it decline to give adequate response to the necessities arising therefrom. the apex court has further gone to the extent of recommending union of india to bring an amendment in the act of 1955 for incorporating the said ground as ground for divorce. the court, ultimately, made following observations in para 96 of the verdict:96. ..... have also expressed their apprehension for introduction of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a ground for grant of the decree of divorce. in their opinion, such an amendment in the act would put human ingenuity at a premium and throw wide open the doors to litigation, and will create more problems then are sought to be .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //