Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: institutes of technology amendment act 2002 section 4 amendment of section 4 Court: rajasthan Page 16 of about 227 results (0.092 seconds)

Apr 16 2010 (HC)

Sukh Dev Vs. Prakash Chandra

Court : Rajasthan

..... maintainable under clause 15 of the letters patent of the high court. then it has been argued that in the case delivered in central mine planning & design institute ltd v. union of india and anr. : (2001) 2 scc 588 the hon'ble supreme court held that the judgment includes intermediary and interlocutory judgments also ..... far as it can be made applicable, in all proceedings in any court of civil jurisdiction. the explanation to that section inserted by the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976, provides as follows:explanation.- in this section, the expression 'proceedings' includes proceedings under order ix, but does not include any proceeding under article ..... into providing further appeal against the order passed by the high court in such mattes will frustrate the purpose for which the code of civil procedure was amended. therefore, substantially these orders are the orders which were passed earlier in revisional jurisdiction of high court for which there was no remedy to challenge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2013 (HC)

Ram Narayan Dhabhai and anr Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... 5), the said contention need not detain this court for long. there is no document on record to indicate that the premises where the petitioner institution was running the educational institution in question were owned by it. undoubtedly, without any fear of contradiction, the petitioner society is a separate legal entity registered under the provisions ..... proceedings cannot be disturbed on this ground. he also submitted that section 90b of the act has since been deleted from the statute book vide rajasthan laws (amendment) act, 2012 notified by the state government on 30/4/2012, therefore, the question of now directing the respondent uit, udaipur to consider the applications of ..... land under section 90b of the rajasthan land revenue act. moreover, section 90b now stands deleted w.e.f. 30/4/2012 by the rajasthan laws (amendment) act 43. for the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that some of the lands have been regularized under the aforesaid government circulars under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2013 (HC)

Laxmi Narayan Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... 5), the said contention need not detain this court for long. there is no document on record to indicate that the premises where the petitioner institution was running the educational institution in question were owned by it. undoubtedly, without any fear of contradiction, the petitioner society is a separate legal entity registered under the provisions of ..... proceedings cannot be disturbed on this ground. he also submitted that section 90b of the act has since been deleted from the statute book vide rajasthan laws (amendment) act, 2012 notified by the state government on 30/4/2012, therefore, the question of now directing the respondent uit, udaipur to consider the applications of ..... no.7734/2010 ram narain dhabhai & anr. vs. state & ors. along with two other connected writ petitions. judgment dated :6. 8/2013 32/46 amendment of the pleadings and granted relief to them by declaring that they are entitled to get benefit of the policy of regularization contained in letter dated 6.12.2001. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2013 (HC)

ChaIn Shanker Dhabhai and anr Vs. State (Uraban) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... 5), the said contention need not detain this court for long. there is no document on record to indicate that the premises where the petitioner institution was running the educational institution in question were owned by it. undoubtedly, without any fear of contradiction, the petitioner society is a separate legal entity registered under the provisions of ..... proceedings cannot be disturbed on this ground. he also submitted that section 90b of the act has since been deleted from the statute book vide rajasthan laws (amendment) act, 2012 notified by the state government on 30/4/2012, therefore, the question of now directing the respondent uit, udaipur to consider the applications of ..... no.7734/2010 ram narain dhabhai & anr. vs. state & ors. along with two other connected writ petitions. judgment dated :6. 8/2013 32/46 amendment of the pleadings and granted relief to them by declaring that they are entitled to get benefit of the policy of regularization contained in letter dated 6.12.2001. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2014 (HC)

Smt.Saroj and ors Vs. Prabhu NaraIn and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the averments that certain explanatory facts could not be pleaded in the plaint by mistake, which were detected while discussing with the counsel and, therefore, application seeking amendment was being filed. by way of said application, the plaintiffs wanted to introduce para 3(a), which single paragraph ran into as many as 10 pages and ..... , the electricity connection and the equipment would be removed at their expenses. at the outset it was contended by learned counsel for the appellants that the amendment application filed by the appellants-plaintiffs was wrongly rejected by the trial court, which has caused immense prejudice to the appellants. it was submitted that on ..... cross examined on the affidavits filed by them, an application under order vi, rule 17 cpc was filed by the plaintiffs, inter alia, seeking to amend averments in the plaint and take so called explanatory pleas that the suit property was purchased and construction thereon raised with the contribution of funds by way .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2005 (HC)

Ramesh Chand Tiwari Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2005Raj208; RLW2005(2)Raj1073; 2005(2)WLC305

..... of the constitution is always in addition to the revisional jurisdiction conferred on it. the curtailment of revisional jurisdiction of the high court under section 115 cpc by amendment act 46 of 1999 does not take away and could not have taken the constitutional jurisdiction of the high court to issue a writ of certiorari to a ..... the bounds of their authority' and 'in a legal manner'. but the supervisory jurisdiction of the high court over all administrative tribunals was abolished by the 42nd amendment act, 1976 on the ground that it caused delay and obstruction in the implementation of government policies. the pre-1976 position has however been resolved by the 44th ..... amendment act, 1978, so that all the tribunals other than military tribunals are again brought under the supervision of the high court.3. article 227 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2005 (HC)

Ramesh Chand Tiwari Vs. Board of Revenue

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2005]147TAXMAN61(Raj)

..... of the constitution is always in addition to the revisional jurisdiction conferred on it. the curtailment of revisional jurisdiction of the high court under section 115 cpc by amendment act 46 of 1999 does not take away and could not have taken the constitutional jurisdiction of the high court to issue a writ of certiorari to a ..... the bounds of their authority 'and' in a legal manner'. but the supervisory jurisdiction of the high court over all administrative tribunals was abolished by the 42nd amendment act, 1976 on the ground that it caused delay and obstruction in the implementation of government policies. the pre-1976 position has however percent resolved by the 44th ..... amendment act, 1978, so that all the tribunals other than military tribunals are again brought under the supervision of the high court.3. article 227 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2013 (HC)

M/S. Laxmi Suiting Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... sections 14, 29, 30 and 38(5), it can safely be concluded that the environmental issues and matters covered under the ngt act, schedule i should be instituted and litigated before the national green tribunal (for short ngt .). such approach may be necessary to avoid likelihood of conflict of orders between the high courts and ..... (protection) act, 1986; 6. the public liability insurance act, 1991; 7. the biological diversity act, 2002. . a bare perusal of schedule-iii authenticates the amendments introduced in the legislations contained in schedule i of the act pursuant to section 36 thereof. section 33 of the act in no uncertain terms assigns an over- riding ..... of any action taken or to be taken by the tribunal in such matters. section 34 reserves to the central government the power by notification to amend schedule-i by including therein any other act, enacted by parliament having regard to the objective of environmental protection and conservation of natural resources, or omitting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2003 (HC)

Atul Singh Vishnoi Vs. Smt. Pushpa Jain

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(2)Raj846

..... 1), that nurshing home is prohibited in the residential area according to the master development plan-2011 ; that minimum plot area should be 750 sq. mts. for any institutional building according to jaipur development authority regulations 2000 (in short j.d.a.) and thus the findings of the courts below are perverse and substantial questions of law are ..... indiramma (6).7. firstly the objection with regard to non-applicability of the jaipur development authority act, 1982 (in short the act, 1982) in view of the 74th amendment in the constitution of india is taken up. this act of 1982 was enacted by the rajasthan state legislature. it extends to jaipur region area and it is not ..... abdur rub firoze ahmed & co. v. jay krishna arora (5), that concurrent findings of requirement and comparative hardship are based on evidence; that in view of 74th amendment in the constitution of india, article 243 z-f was added, which came into force w.e.f. 1st of june 1993 and thus all the activities of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2011 (HC)

Maheshwari Agro Industries Vs. Union of India

Court : Rajasthan

..... of the act cannot mean that such powers are specifically excluded from the jurisdiction of the first appellate authority. 28. the honble supreme court in the case of institute of chartered accountants of india v. l.k. ratna reported in air 1987 sc 71 held as under: 16. it is next pointed out on behalf of ..... the meaning of ss. 54, 54b and 54d 26/09/1973 capital gains, return of income, recovery sections 54, 54b, 54d, 140a, 220, sec. 45 of the it act, 1961, provides for the taxation of capital gains arising on the transfer of capital assets. secs. 54,54b and 54d grant exemption in respect of capital gains arising on ..... grant stay upon the first appellate authority, namely, deputy commissioner (appeals) and commissioner of income tax (appeals), such powers cannot be inferred and in view of later amendment in section 254 of the act, conferring such powers only on income tax appellate tribunal, by necessary implication on the other hand, it should be construed that parliament deliberately .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //