Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: institutes of technology amendment act 2002 section 4 amendment of section 4 Court: chennai Page 2 of about 708 results (0.148 seconds)

Krishnaswami (K.R.) Vs. Director of Technical Education and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1969)ILLJ600Mad

..... central polytechnic, madras, with effect from 12 january 1956. in the year 1960, when the government of madras established a separate institute known as the institute of films technology, these staff were transferred to the control of the director of technical education with effect from 14 september 1960 the petitioner was transferred ..... the time of the selection, the commission felt that the petitioner possessed the necessary qualification and also experience in technical line. subsequently, the government amended the rules regarding qualification for the said post of head of section of cinematography and sound engineering. but this certainly would not affect the petitioner ..... , as he entered the departmental service before the amended rules came into force, and further he had the necessary qualification when he entered service.7. learned counsel for the petitioner contended that., since .....

K.R. Krishnaswami, Superintendent, Junior Technical School, Government ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ348

..... central polytechnic, madras, with effect from 12th january, 1956. in the year 1960, when the government of madras established a separate institute known as the institute of films technology, these staff were transferred to the control of the director of technical education with effect from 14th september, 1960. the petitioner was ..... the time of the selection, the commission felt that the petitioner possessed the necessary qualification and also experience in technical line. subsequently, the government amended the rules regarding qualification for the said post of head of 'section of cinematography and sound engineering. but this certainly would not affect the petitioner ..... , as he entered the departmental service before the amended rules came into force, and further he had the necessary qualification when he entered service.7. learned counsel for the petitioner contended that, since .....

Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. C. C. M. Kothari Educational Tr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1997)143CTR(Mad)94

..... and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to exemption under s. 11 of the it act in view of the amended provisions of s. 13(1)(d) of the act extending the time limit upto 31st march, 1993 for converting the deposits into permissible mode of investments ..... the assessee is entitled to exemption under s. 10(22) of the act. the tribunal held following an earlier decision of this court in the case of aditanar educational institution (supra) that the assessee is entitled to exemption under s. 10(22) of the act. but, while framing the question in the reference application, the department stated ..... previous year ?'2. before the tribunal the question was whether the assessee is entitled to exemption under s. 10(22) of the it act, 1961. the tribunal following the decision of this court in the case of cit vs. aditanar educational institution (1975) 118 itr 235 held that the assessee is entitled to exemption under s. 10(22) of the .....

M/s. SRF Ltd. Vs. Customs, Excise and Service Tax and Another

Court : Chennai

..... justice of a.p vs. l.v.a dixitulu, reported in (1979) 2 scc 34. 2. union of india vs. pramod gupta (2005) 12 scc 1; and 3. national institute of technology vs. niraj kumar singh reported in (2007) 2 scc 481. in the above judgments, it has been held that an order passed without jurisdiction, is nullity. 20. in the decision ..... :- 20. the legal position is no more res integra that an award and decree having become final under the la act cannot be amended or altered seeking enhancement of the statutory benefits under the amended provisions brought in by the amendment act in the la act by filing petitions under section 151 and section 152 cpc. in view of this, the award and .....

Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Offi ...

Court : Chennai

..... interest on such deposits is not likely to be declared in it returns. 55.2. with a view to improving tax compliance, s.194a of the it act has been amended to secure deduction of tax at source from interest on time deposits with the aforesaid banking companies and co-operative societies engaged in carrying on the business ..... . if for a moment, we get back to the provisions of the income tax act, 1961, we would find that section 194a deals with the following types of co- operative institutions: (a) co-operative society; (b) co-operative bank; (c) co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking; (d) primary agricultural credit society; ( ..... insurance corporation; (v) to the unit trust of india; (vi) to any company or co-operative society carrying on the business of insurance; (vii) to such other institution which the central government may by notification indicate. exclusions under clauses (iv) and (vi): 14. the liability to deduct tax at source will not arise in respect of .....

V. Ramiah Vs. the State Bank of India by Its Secretary and Treasurer

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1967)2MLJ519

..... . 170, and narayanaswamy naidu v. krishnamurthy : air1958mad343 , which dealt with the life insurance corporation of india. we might further cite t.c.m. pillay v. indian institute of technology : (1964)1mlj70 , and refer to the catena of decisions cited at the bar wherein, universities and various state-aided corporations have received legal recognition as 'public authorities'. ..... common-place that a democratic welfare state may undertake what would be regarded in the nineteenth century as functions purely limited to private industrial enterprises; our own amendment of article 19(6)-article 19(6)(ii)- investing the state, or a corporation owned or controlled by the state, with a power to embark on ..... in other words, the board cannot ignore the existing rule by treating the order made in that particular case as amendment of the rule. that the government or the board has the power to amend the rule should make no difference, both are bound to dispose of the matters that come up, before them in .....

Beml Ltd. Vs. Beml Midwest Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB Chennai

..... the issues which arise for my consideration are - (a) whether shri m. pitchiah does enjoy any authority of the petitioner-company to institute the present proceedings; (b) whether the amendments sought to be introduced by the applicant are permissible in the facts of the present case; and (c) whether the prayer for appointment ..... sector enterprise, owned and controlled by government of india and is engaged in the business of manufacturing defence and earth moving equipments, rail coaches and other technology as well as trading activity. the directors of the petitioner-company are appointed by the president of india, as envisaged in clause 97 of the articles ..... held on 29-4-1989 approved delegation and sub-delegation of powers, according to which (serial no. 61) a functional director is also authorized to institute legal proceedings on behalf of the petitioner-company. the guidelines on corporate governance for central public sector enterprises issued by government of india from time to time .....

Ramiah (V.) Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ424Mad

..... . krishnamurthi 1958 i l.l.j. 867, which dealt with the life insurance corporation of india. we might further cits dr. t.c.m. pillay v. indian institute of technology 1964 ii l.l.j. 811, and refer to the catena of decisions at the bar, wherein universities and various state aided corporations have received legal recognition as ' ..... it is a common place that a democratic welfare state may undertake what would be regarded in the nineteenth century as functions purely limited to private industrial enterprises; our own amendment of article 19(6)-article 10(6)(ii) -investing the state, or a corporation award or controlled by the state. with a power to embark on such enterprises ..... stated:in other words, the board cannot ignore the existing rule fey treating the order made in that particular case as an amendment of the rate. that the government or the board has the power to amend the rate should make no difference, both are bound to dispose of the matters that come up before them in accordance with .....

C.V. Raman Vs. the Management of Bank of India, Regional Office, South ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1985)2MLJ439

..... the shops act.43. in reply mr. m.r. narayanaswami, learned counsel for the state bank of india, again draws our attention to the decision in pillai v. indian institute of technology (1964) ii l.l.j. 311 and also to ramaiah v. state bank of india (1968) 2 l.l.j. 424. on the strength of these two cases ..... the general working of the state bank of india shall be responsive to and in consonance with government policies while the autonomy of the institution in the day-to-day working will be fully maintained. amendments necessary to the reserve bank of india act, 1934, and to the banking companies act, 1947, consequently to the establishment of this ..... to be applicable in madras state electricity board v. commissioner of labour : (1960)iillj357mad . if really, section 4 (1) (c) of the shops act, when it was amended, omitted railways, and retained reserve bank of india, that is a matter for consideration. then again, the government of tamil nadu itself granted exemption on the assumption that the act .....

Ramanujam (G.) Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ299Mad

..... held invalid.13. the madras high court in t.c.m. pillai v. indian institute of technology 1964 ii l.l.j. 311, has held that the dismissal of an assistant professor of metallurgy in the indian institute of technology without observing the mandatory procedure prescribed under the statute would be a nullity and liable to ..... the face of the overwhelming authorities the preliminary objection raised on behalf of the respondent that the dismissal of the petitioner by the life insurance corporation is not amendable to the writ jurisdiction of this court, will have to be rejected.15. in the result, the writ petition is allowed. the life insurance corporation of ..... . their workmen : (1963)iillj452sc (vide supra) were rendered with regard to the disputes under the industrial disputes act. in the case of domestic enquiry by an institution like the life insurance corporation of india, the decision of the supreme court in state of mysore v. shivabasappa : (1964)illj24sc (vide supra) would be applicable and .....