Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 6 other committees Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 18 of about 279 results (0.045 seconds)

Apr 10 2015 (HC)

Chandu Parihar and Anr Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... case as well as by the supreme court in sanjay singh's case (supra).15. learned counsel appearing for the rpsc submits that the optional subjects in section-b of schedule iii have since been done away by the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012 ..... the same examiner. it, therefore, becomes necessary to distribute the answer-scripts among several examiners for valuation with the paper-setter (or other senior person) acting as the head examiner. when more than one examiner evaluate the answer-scripts relating to a subject, the subjectivity of the respective examiner will creep into the ..... to reduce examiner subjectivity or variability is known as moderation. the classic method of moderation is as follows: (i) the paper-setter of the subject normally acts as the head examiner for the subject. he is selected from amongst senior academicians/scholars/senior civil 22 servants/judges. where the case of a large number .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 2015 (HC)

Renubala Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... usha devi and after holding fresh elections from the agriculturists. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to provisions of sub-section 5 of section 7 of the act read with rule 32 of the rules that till such time that the quorum for election of chairman and vice-chairman is complete, the 5/ ..... in this behalf shall call the firs.meeting of a newly constituted market committee to elect its chairman and vice-chairman from amongst its members subject to sec. 7(8) of the act. for the purpose of this election, the collector or the person authorised by him in this behalf shall preside over the meeting but shall not ..... category and petitioner belongs to said category; further submissions have been made that the mandi samiti is a super class mandi and under the provisions of section 7 of the act, the market committee is constituted consists of 17 members.which includes eight agriculturists, two traders and brokers.one from weighmen etc., one member of legislative .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2015 (HC)

Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... per the respondents, a complaint was filed in the police station shastri nagar, jodhpur upon which fir no.182 dated 14.6.2000 was registered under section 408 ipc against the petitioner. in the inquiry, so called complainant kishore singh did not appear to prove the charge levelled against the petitioner which is evident ..... the alleged charges levelled against the appellant.likewise, the criminal proceedings were initiated against the appellant for the alleged charges punishable under the provisions of p.c.act on the same set of facts and evidence. it was submitted that the departmental proceedings and the criminal case are based on identical and similar (verbatim) ..... magistrate no.1, jodhpur. the learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that it is a case in which the inquiry officer and disciplinary authority has acted contrary to law and gave finding of guilt without even recording statement of complainant kishore singh but in the fir filed by the bank the investigating officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2015 (HC)

State of Raj. and Ors Vs. Rughnath Ram and Anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... by the court:(per hon'ble ms. jaishree thakur,j.) 1. the present appeal has been preferred against the order dated 16.4.2014.2. an application under section 5 of the limitation act seeking condonation of delay of 44 days in filing the appeal has been preferred. the delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the matter is being disposed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2013 (HC)

Saint Shri Asharam Bapu Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... children) act, 2000 and section 8 of the protection of children from sexual offences act. reliance was placed on the judgment in the cases of brij mohan singh versus [4].priya brat narain sinha, reported in air1965sc282 hoak saing versus m a e hla & ors., reported in air1940rangoon 191, ram charan & ors.versus state of u.p., reported in 1968(3) ..... the father of the prosecutrix. in the map, mark 'b' is the door, which is the back door entry. in pursuance to his statement recorded under section 27 of the evidence act, the petitioner identified the said place as was shown by the victim. the call details show that the various co-accused were in touch with the victim and ..... by asa ram. moreover, presently and in the situation as in the present case, the statement of the prosecutrix under section 164 of the cr.p.c.attains importance in view of the provision of section 114a of the indian evidence act, 1872. hon'ble the apex court in the case of mohan lal & anr. versus state of punjab (criminal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2013 (HC)

Ratna Ram Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... opinion that ex-facie, the fir impugned does not stand to the tests prescribed by the hon'ble apex court in the aforesaid judgment for the acts complained of to be covered under section 306 i.p.c.from the material available on the record, it is evident that the deceased was highly hypersensitive to ordinary petulance discord differences and ..... in the transaction of sale. in order to prosecute a person for the offence of abetting suicide firstly it has to be shown that he acted in the manner described in section 107 of the i.p.c.section 107 i.p.c.reads as below: 107. abetment of a thing.- a person abets the doing of a thing, who - first- ..... said to aid the doing of that act. . admittedly, the petitioner neither incited nor provoked nor instigated the deceased to commit suicide. as a 6 matter of fact, no interaction whatsoever admittedly took place between the petitioner and the deceased. mere allegation of harassment even if true cannot attract the mischief of section 306/107 i.p.c.applying the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2013 (HC)

Shiva @ Savaram Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... case, payable by the state government. . it is to be noted with lot of satisfaction that due to initiative taken by the courts, the legislature by introducing act no.5 of 2009 had introduced section 357a by enacting victim compensation scheme. whether accused is acquitted or convicted irrespective of that, a victim is to be compensated. having held that a victim of ..... , an adjournment be granted to place the same on record. the case of the prosecution is that a child defined under the provisions of protection of children from sexual offences act, has been raped. section 309 of the criminal procedure code was amended by the parliament vide the criminal law (amendment) bill, 2012 i.e. bill no.63 of 2013. proviso to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2013 (HC)

Sanchita Gupta @ Shilpi Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... case, payable by the state government. . it is to be noted with lot of satisfaction that due to initiative taken by the courts, the legislature by introducing act no.5 of 2009 had introduced section 357a by enacting victim compensation scheme. whether accused is acquitted or convicted irrespective of that, a victim is to be compensated. having held that a victim of ..... , an adjournment be granted to place the same on record. the case of the prosecution is that a child defined under the provisions of protection of children from sexual offences act, has been raped. section 309 of the criminal procedure code was amended by the parliament vide the criminal law (amendment) bill, 2012 i.e. bill no.63 of 2013. proviso to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2014 (HC)

Bharat Construction Company Vs. Chief Engineer I.G.N.P.Bikaner and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... be served upon the respondents on 1.11.2012. after lapse of 30 days from the date of notice, specially when the application under section 11(6) of the act of 1996 was already filed by the petitioner, no reason was there for making reference as per clause 23. as a matter of fact the respondents ..... of october, 2012. suffice to mention here that the petitioner prior to the reference of the dispute to the standing committee preferred this application as per section 11(6) of the act of 1996. this fact was also communicated to the respondents by the petitioner and the notice issued by this court on 5.10.2012 also came to ..... mr.dlr vyas, for the petitioner-applicant. mr.k.r.saharan, deputy government counsel...this application is preferred as per provisions of section 11(6) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1996 .) for appointment of an independent arbitrator. briefly stated, facts of the case are that under the work order dated 20 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2014 (HC)

Kailash Chandra Sharma Vs. State (Rural Dev. Andpanchayat Raj) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... application also. in the meanwhile and until further orders, the respondents shall not discontinue the petitioner from service in pursuant to the instructions granted to the officer-in-charge, establishment section, mahatma gandhi narega, bhilwara under the communication dated 29.7.2011 by the district programme coordinator-cum-collector, bhilwara. . 4. though reply to the writ petition has been filed by ..... the light of the submissions made hereinabove in detail, as also, reasons recorded in detail in the order dt.29.7.2011 (annex.6), it is respectfully submitted that the act and action of the answering respondents, as well as the order dt. 2.7.2011 passed by them are perfectly legal, valid, justified, well within its jurisdiction, in accordance with .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //