Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... connected appeals. 11 industrial dispute misc. no.35/2006 (anil acharya s/o shri satya narayan acharya. vs. superintending engineer, p.h.e.d. circle bikaner, under section 10(1) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 to adjudicate as to whether anil acharya workman appointed as work charged beldar, was wrongly denied the semi permanent status by the order of executive engineer ..... lal tholia's lrs. 41.d.b. civil special appeal (writ) no.1568/2014 state of raj.& ors. vs. bhanwar singh. date of judgment :::20. 11.2014 hon ble the acting chief justice mr.sunil ambwani hon ble mr.justice prakash gupta mr.pr singh, aag a/w mr.nk mehta & mr.dinesh ojha for the state appellants. mr.manoj bhandari .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... connected appeals. 11 industrial dispute misc. no.35/2006 (anil acharya s/o shri satya narayan acharya. vs. superintending engineer, p.h.e.d. circle bikaner, under section 10(1) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 to adjudicate as to whether anil acharya workman appointed as work charged beldar, was wrongly denied the semi permanent status by the order of executive engineer ..... lal tholia's lrs. 41.d.b. civil special appeal (writ) no.1568/2014 state of raj.& ors. vs. bhanwar singh. date of judgment :::20. 11.2014 hon ble the acting chief justice mr.sunil ambwani hon ble mr.justice prakash gupta mr.pr singh, aag a/w mr.nk mehta & mr.dinesh ojha for the state appellants. mr.manoj bhandari .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... connected appeals. 11 industrial dispute misc. no.35/2006 (anil acharya s/o shri satya narayan acharya. vs. superintending engineer, p.h.e.d. circle bikaner, under section 10(1) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 to adjudicate as to whether anil acharya workman appointed as work charged beldar, was wrongly denied the semi permanent status by the order of executive engineer ..... lal tholia's lrs. 41.d.b. civil special appeal (writ) no.1568/2014 state of raj.& ors. vs. bhanwar singh. date of judgment :::20. 11.2014 hon ble the acting chief justice mr.sunil ambwani hon ble mr.justice prakash gupta mr.pr singh, aag a/w mr.nk mehta & mr.dinesh ojha for the state appellants. mr.manoj bhandari .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... connected appeals. 11 industrial dispute misc. no.35/2006 (anil acharya s/o shri satya narayan acharya. vs. superintending engineer, p.h.e.d. circle bikaner, under section 10(1) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 to adjudicate as to whether anil acharya workman appointed as work charged beldar, was wrongly denied the semi permanent status by the order of executive engineer ..... lal tholia's lrs. 41.d.b. civil special appeal (writ) no.1568/2014 state of raj.& ors. vs. bhanwar singh. date of judgment :::20. 11.2014 hon ble the acting chief justice mr.sunil ambwani hon ble mr.justice prakash gupta mr.pr singh, aag a/w mr.nk mehta & mr.dinesh ojha for the state appellants. mr.manoj bhandari .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... connected appeals. 11 industrial dispute misc. no.35/2006 (anil acharya s/o shri satya narayan acharya. vs. superintending engineer, p.h.e.d. circle bikaner, under section 10(1) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 to adjudicate as to whether anil acharya workman appointed as work charged beldar, was wrongly denied the semi permanent status by the order of executive engineer ..... lal tholia's lrs. 41.d.b. civil special appeal (writ) no.1568/2014 state of raj.& ors. vs. bhanwar singh. date of judgment :::20. 11.2014 hon ble the acting chief justice mr.sunil ambwani hon ble mr.justice prakash gupta mr.pr singh, aag a/w mr.nk mehta & mr.dinesh ojha for the state appellants. mr.manoj bhandari .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... back wages. in compliance of the said award, respondent was reinstated vide order dated 14.12.2006, but on the same day, notices under sections 25(a) and (b) of the industrial disputes act were issued to respondent and his services were again terminated. the respondent, therefore, rushed to the high court challenging the validity of the order ..... arnod. the state government, however, vide order dated 30.08.2002, directed appellant no.4 to terminate the services of respondent after making compliance of section 25f and g of the industrial disputes act, 1947. in the result, the services of respondent were dispensed with vide order dated 25.09.2002, passed by [2]. dbsaw- 125/2015 ..... 2015 in s.b. civil writ petition no.2030/2007 the state of rajasthan & ors. vs. hawji meena date:26.10.2015 hon'ble mr.justice ajit singh, acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice arun bhansali mr.k.l.thakur, additional advocate general with mr.rishab tayal for the appellants. mr.kuldeep mathur for the respondent. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... back wages. in compliance of the said award, respondent was reinstated vide order dated 14.12.2006, but on the same day, notices under sections 25(a) and (b) of the industrial disputes act were issued to respondent and his services were again terminated. the respondent, therefore, rushed to the high court challenging the validity of the order ..... arnod. the state government, however, vide order dated 30.08.2002, directed appellant no.4 to terminate the services of respondent after making compliance of section 25f and g of the industrial disputes act, 1947. in the result, the services of respondent were dispensed with vide order dated 25.09.2002, passed by [2]. dbsaw- 126/2015 ..... in s.b. civil writ petition no.2150/2007 the state of rajasthan & ors. vs. karu lal meena date:26.10.2015 hon'ble mr.justice ajit singh, acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice arun bhansali mr.k.l.thakur, additional advocate general with mr.rishab tayal for the appellants. mr.kuldeep mathur for the respondent. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... , though normally the plea raised by the defendants 14 regarding the suit being barred under the provisions of order ii, rule 2 or order ix, rule 9 or section 11 cpc needs to be examined after the parties had led oral and documentary evidence, at the time of final decision of the suit. however, in the present ..... . i have considered the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. while the plaintiff trust, which is registered under the provisions of rajasthan public trust act, 1959 and on that basis claims its right to manage the temple and the control alongwith a right to appoint pujaris etc. and further claims ownership of the ..... a society, which is named shri chokhala mandal trust samiti, ghoth manglod, dadhimati mata ji ka mandir, which is registered with the registrar under the societies registration act. it was claimed that suit was filed by shri dadhimati mataji mandir samiti against the pujaris being civil original suit no.82/1977 questioning the formation of the said .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... filed counter reference seeking directions different than what was sought by the applicants therein. the district court proceeded with the inquiry as contemplated under section 40 of the act and interim orders providing for management of the trust were also made/continued. however, it appears that on account of some settlement/compromise ..... be passed by the learned assistant commissioner. in pursuance of the order dated 24.02.2010 (supra), the assistant commissioner initiated proceedings under section 38 of the act and on 19.03.2010 appointed a interim management committee under the chairmanship of nayab tehsildar, shivganj. the said order dated 19.03. ..... consequential directions. aggrieved against the order dated 05.10.2009 passed by the assistant commissioner, varda ram and maga ram filed a suit under section 22 of the act seeking cancellation of the entries made by the assistant commissioner. alongwith the suit, an application seeking temporary injunction was filed. however, the temporary .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... filed counter reference seeking directions different than what was sought by the applicants therein. the district court proceeded with the inquiry as contemplated under section 40 of the act and interim orders providing for management of the trust were also made/continued. however, it appears that on account of some settlement/compromise ..... be passed by the learned assistant commissioner. in pursuance of the order dated 24.02.2010 (supra), the assistant commissioner initiated proceedings under section 38 of the act and on 19.03.2010 appointed a interim management committee under the chairmanship of nayab tehsildar, shivganj. the said order dated 19.03. ..... consequential directions. aggrieved against the order dated 05.10.2009 passed by the assistant commissioner, varda ram and maga ram filed a suit under section 22 of the act seeking cancellation of the entries made by the assistant commissioner. alongwith the suit, an application seeking temporary injunction was filed. however, the temporary .....
Tag this Judgment!