Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 31 cognizance and trial of offence Page 1 of about 277 results (0.408 seconds)

Hindustan Chemicals Industries Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1997]88CompCas794(P& H)

..... had already expired. in support of this submission, he drew my attention to the provisions of section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968. section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968, reads as follows : '24. report of insecticide analyst.-(1) the insecticide analyst to whom a sample of any insecticide has been submitted for test or analysis under sub-section (6) of section 22, shall, within a period of sixty days, deliver to the ..... insecticide inspector submitting it a signed report in duplicate in the prescribed form. (2) the insecticide inspector on receipt .....

Dr. L.C. Rohella and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)133PLR195

..... sanction was required under the provisions of section 31 of the insecticide act, 1968 and the aforesaid provisions contained in section 31 were mandatory and no cognizance of the offences could have taken nor the trial in the case commenced. for the ..... it was found that there was variation in the active ingredients and, therefore, the aforesaid sample was declared as misbranded under the provisions of section 3(k)(i) of the insecticide act, 1968.3. sh. arun nehra, learned counsel for the petitioners has sought the quashing of the complaint on the ground that in fact prior ..... the complaint annexure p-4 pending in the court of chief judicial magistrate, jalandhar, which had been tiled under the provisions of section 33 of the insecticide act, 1968 read with rule 27(5) of insecticide rules, 1971. a copy of the aforesaid complaint has been attached as annexure p-4 with the present petition.2. petitioner no .....

United Phospherus Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1681; 2002(5)WLN59

..... against the order of the learned judicial magistrate, first class, gharsana in criminal original no. 478/94 dated 19th october, 94 taking cognizance against the petitioners under section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 (in short, 'the act') hereinafter) and the present petitioners alongwith other accused were summoned. 2. heard mr. m.k. garg, learned counsel for the petitioner and mr. d.d. kalla, learned ..... . the insecticides act, 1968 is a central act, which has been enacted to regulate the import, manufacture, sale, transport, distribution arid use of insecticides with a view to prevent risk to human beings or animals and for matters connected therewith. 24. section 17 of the act prohibits of import and manufacture of certain insecticides enumerated therein and section 18 prohibits of sale etc. of certain insecticides mentioned in the section. section 20 .....

Dr. Cheeran Abraham Varghese Vs. Maulvi Ab. Hamid

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1990CriLJ533

..... of property. the special act i.e. the insecticides act does not at all deal with these offences which are independent of that ..... or inducing a person with dishonest intention to part with money, to purchase sub-standard insecticides which has the effect of causing wrongful loss to a person who parts with the money is not an offence grouped under section 29 of the insecticides act of 1968.11. offences punishable under sections 419 and 420 rpc relate to cheating by personation and cheating by dishonestly inducing delivery .....

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. the Government of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

..... counsel for the petitioner and learned app for the state.9. section 22 of the act prescribes the procedure to be followed by insecticide inspector when he takes any sample of insecticide. the relevant sub-section (6) of section 22 of the insecticides act, 1968 is as under: 22. procedure to be followed by insecticide inspectors (1) where an insecticide inspector seizes any record, register or document under clause (b) sub ..... hundred) to which none of the accused replied.3. consequently, respondent no.2 filed a complaint before the trial court under section 200 cr.pc for the offence under section 29 (1) (a) of the insecticides act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) on 21.10.2013 on the basis of which the trial court took cognizance and issued summons to the petitioner on 16 .....

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. The Government of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

..... counsel for the petitioner and learned app for the state.9. section 22 of the act prescribes the procedure to be followed by insecticide inspector when he takes any sample of insecticide. the relevant sub-section (6) of section 22 of the insecticides act, 1968 is as under: 22. procedure to be followed by insecticide inspectors (1) where an insecticide inspector seizes any record, register or document under clause (b) sub ..... hundred) to which none of the accused replied.3. consequently, respondent no.2 filed a complaint before the trial court under section 200 cr.pc for the offence under section 29 (1) (a) of the insecticides act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) on 21.10.2013 on the basis of which the trial court took cognizance and issued summons to the petitioner on 16 .....

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. the Government of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

..... counsel for the petitioner and learned app for the state.9. section 22 of the act prescribes the procedure to be followed by insecticide inspector when he takes any sample of insecticide. the relevant sub-section (6) of section 22 of the insecticides act, 1968 is as under: 22. procedure to be followed by insecticide inspectors (1) where an insecticide inspector seizes any record, register or document under clause (b) sub ..... hundred) to which none of the accused replied.3. consequently, respondent no.2 filed a complaint before the trial court under section 200 cr.pc for the offence under section 29 (1) (a) of the insecticides act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) on 21.10.2013 on the basis of which the trial court took cognizance and issued summons to the petitioner on 16 .....

A.K. Chauhan Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4611

..... conforming to the isi specifications with respect to its present active ingredient contained from which it was clear the anilophos 30% ec was misbranded under section 3(k)(i) of the insecticides act, 1968 as the sample contained only 24.91% active ingredient contents of anilophos instead of 30% ec. it was reported that in this manner the ..... who is holding trial to find out whether as chemist he was responsible for maintaining the quality of the insecticides manufactured by the company. section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 reads as follows :-'(1) whenever an offence under this act has been committed by company, every person who at the time of offence was committed was in charge ..... m.i.e. bahadurgarh, distt. jhajjar through surinder kumar (n) a.k. chauhan, chemist of delta insecticides ltd. under sections 3(k)(i), 9, 17, 18,29, 30, 3(c) and 33 of insecticides act, 1968 and rule 10 of insecticides rules, 1971.2. on 2.7.1993 the business premises of m/s garg trading co., bareta was inspected .....

Ajay Pratap Singh. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

..... 977/- and had violated the provisions of insecticides act by selling damaged insecticides.3. after registering first information report, the police conducted investigation and finally on 30.11.1989 submitted chargesheet under sections 409, 468, 471 and 120b of the indian penal code and section 18 of the insecticides act, 1968. after submission of the chargesheet, cognizance was ..... (supra) also makes it clear that roving inquiry and fishing enquiry is impermissible.9. so far as the plea of violation of section 31 of the insecticides act is concerned, the court is in agreement with the submission advanced by the learned additional public prosecutor that in the present case the ..... first information report was registered, it was registered for the offences under sections 409, 420, 478 and 471 of the indian penal code and sections 412 and 120 of the indian penal code and section 18 of the insecticides act was added subsequently and there is specific allegation in the first information report .....

Crop Care Federation of India and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... impugning an order dated 08.01.2019 passed by the central government (appellate authority), rejecting the appeal preferred by the petitioners under section 10 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereafter the insecticides act ). the petitioners had preferred the said appeal against the decision of the registration committee (hereafter rc ) taken at its 370th ..... meeting held on 15.10.2016, to grant registration under section 9(3) of the insecticides act in respect w.p.(c) 8117/2019 page 1 ..... any application for grant of such registration. the petitioners had contended that in the circumstances, the grant of provisional registration under section 9(3b) of the insecticides act was without jurisdiction.13. on 18.07.2016, the petitioners also made a representation to rc alleging various deficiencies in the .....