Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: rajasthan Page 7 of about 123 results (0.057 seconds)

Manju Surana (Mrs.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(4)Raj2747; 2005(4)WLC633

..... their presence must be specified on the product. the sale of the product should not be allowed without disclosing the composition of the product and the presence, if any, of insecticide, pesticide and chemicals....'6. learned counsel for the applicants canvassed before us that it is currently impossible to have any accurate way of measuring the pesticide residue level in finished ..... chain and the extent thereof.8. in the course of arguments we were taken through various research works related to pesticides residues and the provisions of prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 and prevention of food adulteration fifth amendment rules, 2003.9. since we have only to clarify as to what kind of disclosure is required, it is not necessary for .....

Maya Devi (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : I(2008)DMC839; RLW2008(1)Raj276

..... with rekha by her husband or relatives of her husband soon before her death for or in connection with demand of dowry, therefore, presumption under section 113b of the evidence act cannot be raised against the accused persons, and, in absence of any consistent evidence in respect of cruelty or harassment with rekha soon before her ..... -torn, (5), cuttings of exhibits (7-8) from five packets marked e, d, a, b and c respectively gave positive test for the presence of chloropyrophos insecticide and gave negative tests for metallic poisons, cyanide, alkaloids, barbiturates and tranquillizers.the portions of viscera (1-4) from two packets marked e and d gave negative tests for ..... valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.19. section 113b of the evidence act is also relevant for the purpose of section 304b, ipc, therefore, section 113b, ipc is also reproduced as under:113b. presumption as to dowry death.- when the question is whether a .....

Cit Vs. Mewar Oils

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2002)177CTR(Raj)303

..... -85, which has not been accepted by the department and the tribunal have proposed reference under section 256(1) vide r.a. no. 251/jp/1991, dated 19-5-1993 ?'3. the respondent-assessee is a limited company indulged in the manufacture and sale of insecticides and pesticides, the assessee-company claimed expenditure on building repairs at rs. 14,18,083. the ..... n.n. mathur, j.heard mr. sandeep bhandawat, learned counsel for the revenue, and mr. n.m. rank, senior advocate.2. this reference application under section 256(2) of the income tax act is filed by the revenue, seeking reference from the order of the tribunal dated 21-6-1995, for the opinion of this court.'whether, on the facts and in the .....

Damodar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1588; 2006(3)WLC686

..... accused told the deceased that she should commit suicide. he had even threaten to kill her. threaten by the action of the accused, the deceased had consumed insecticide and committed suicide. however, this court was of the opinion that merely asking for a loan to be repaid, does not amount to instigating or aiding the ..... activities on the part of the abettor. therefore, it involves means rea in ensuring that the offence is committed. thus, while framing a charge for offence under section 306 ipc, the learned court has to consider whether the abettor intentionally instigated or entered into a criminal conspiracy or aided the commission of the suicide. in case ..... us.3. mr. satyandra kumar gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, has argued that the charge for offence under section 306 ipc can be framed only if the ingredients of section 107 pc are present. an act to qualify as an abatement has to be done intentionally by the abettor. merely because the petitioner was asking for the .....

Suresh Rawat Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj266

..... b gave negative tests for metallic poisons, ethyl and methyl alcohol, cyanide, alkaloids, barbiturates, tranquillizers and insecticides.'9. the appellant has been convicted under section 304b as well as 498a, ipc, therefore, it will be relevant to refer both the sections, which are as under:304b. dowry death.- (1) where the death of a woman is caused ..... security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.10. section 113b of the evidence act is also relevant for the purpose of section 304b, ipc, therefore, section 113b, ipc is also reproduced as under:113b. presumption as to dowry death.- when the question is whether a ..... harassment by the appellant soon before her death for, or in connection with, demand for dowry, and in absence of such evidence, the presumption under section 113b of the evidence act was not attracted, but the learned trial court, without considering the said aspect of the matter, convicted the accused-appellant only on the basis of .....

Amar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : I(2004)DMC709; RLW2004(4)Raj2181; 2004(1)WLC350

..... for chemical examination. according to fsl report ex.p-30 viscera gave negative tests for metallic poisons methyle and methyle alcohol, cyanide, alkaloids, barbiturates, tranquillizers and insecticides.4. dr. mahendra kumar gupta (pw.9) who performed autopsy, in his deposition categorically stated that santosh got burnt after her death therefore sign of burns ..... of santosh with the appellants were cordial. it was further urged that there was contradictory evidence with regard to demand of dowry and presumption under section 113b of the evidence act could not be drawn. two views in regard to death of santosh were possible therefore the benefit of doubt be given to the appellants. ..... the existence of certain other facts, unless the accused failed to offer any explanation which might drive the court to draw a different inference. section 114 of the evidence act empowers the court to presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have happened. having regard to the common courses of .....

Dhanna Ram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1995(2)WLC527; 1995(1)WLN211

..... in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing, or.thirdly - intentionally aids by any act or illegal omission the doing of that thing.6. in order to sustain conviction under section 306, it must, therefore, be proved by the prosecution that there was abetment of suicide. according to the allegations of ..... be established that such other person committed suicide.11. therefore, as laid down by the supreme court of india, the prosecution must prove, to bring home charge under section 306, that the accused instigated the deceased to commit suicide and as a result of which instigation, suicide was committed. it, therefore, must be proved by the ..... said that any of the appellants actively helped or instigated the deceased in committing suicide.18. there is also no evidence on record to sustain the conviction under section 498 of the penal code. in fact, no physical cruelty was alleged. nagging was continuing for more than ten years and cannot, therefore, be called a .....

Hari Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000WLC(Raj)UC437; 2000(2)WLN447

..... and fall in a well. thereupon mangal singh committed suicide by falling himself in a well. learned addl. sessions judge on the basis of this evidence framed charge under section 306 ipc against the petitioners.4. counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners did not add or abet the offence and, therefore, the charge framed against the ..... instigates any person to do a thing or secondly, engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing. there is nothing on record in this case that ..... on record to show that the petitioners had such a mens rea or intention that the deceased should commit suicide. consequently they should not have been charged with offence under section 306 ipc. i am conscious that even strong suspicion can be the basis to frame charge. in this case, no such circumstance is found.8. consequently, the .....

Satveer Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(2)Raj1034; 2003(1)WLC350

..... public prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant. learned counsel for the accused petitioners contended that the prosecution case if taken as it is, no offence under section 306 ipc is made out as there is absolutely no evidence of any abetment. while referring the evidence, it was contended that the meeting between the accused ..... the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment as provided in this section. section 107 ipc defines the term 'abetment'. a person abets the doing of a thing, who instigates any person to do that thing or intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing. when considered the entire evidence in ..... the light of the definition of the 'abetment', no offence under section 306 ipc is prima facie made out in view of the judgments reported in case .....

Ratna Ram Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... opinion that ex-facie, the fir impugned does not stand to the tests prescribed by the hon'ble apex court in the aforesaid judgment for the acts complained of to be covered under section 306 i.p.c.from the material available on the record, it is evident that the deceased was highly hypersensitive to ordinary petulance discord differences and ..... in the transaction of sale. in order to prosecute a person for the offence of abetting suicide firstly it has to be shown that he acted in the manner described in section 107 of the i.p.c.section 107 i.p.c.reads as below: 107. abetment of a thing.- a person abets the doing of a thing, who - first- ..... said to aid the doing of that act. . admittedly, the petitioner neither incited nor provoked nor instigated the deceased to commit suicide. as a 6 matter of fact, no interaction whatsoever admittedly took place between the petitioner and the deceased. mere allegation of harassment even if true cannot attract the mischief of section 306/107 i.p.c.applying the .....