Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: rajasthan Page 10 of about 123 results (0.065 seconds)

Rajkumar Kulshrestha Vs. the Secretary, Rajasthan State Electricity Bo ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1979WLN645

..... all fours to the facts of this case. the petitioner cannot therefore derive any help firm the regulations framed by the board under clause (c) of section 79 of the 1948 act for obtaining the relief prayed in this petition.13. assuming for moment that the regulations constitute a statutory restriction as to the kind of action which the ..... '. such regulations could always be made by the board, as an employer like any other employer, in respect of its employees even if the 1948 act had been silent about it. section 79(c) which purports to enable the board to make such regulations is not creatory but clarificatory in nature. it clarifies that the board has the ..... order. the petitioner's name appeared at serial number 4 of the said order. the board also prepared a seniority list (annexure 2) of assistant engineers in september 1968. the petitioner's name appeared at number 106 of the seniority list. out of the 30 assistant engineers promoted as officiating executive engineers by virtue of one and .....

Durga Dass Vs. Kanhaiyalal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1970WLN563

..... effect, a statute impairing contracts & affecting vested rights should be presumed to be prospective in effect. there are no express words either in the act or in section 27 of the act. providing for retrospective effect. there are, however, some important features which deserve to be emphasised.12. the provision seeks to give legislative recognition to ..... a conclusion--having given our careful consideration to the question, we have come to the conclusion that there is really no repugnancy between section 23 and section 2(17) of the act.it was further observed that acceptance of a contrary argument would introduce a very material limitation which is not warranted by the words used ..... agree with the view taken by the bombay high court.17. in nanuram's case 1968 rlw 358, a learned single judge of this court was interpreting sections. 29(2)&(3) of the act. in sub-section (2) the expression 'suit to which this act applies' finds specific mention. on account of this feature & the difference in the .....

Parmeshwar Lal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and 14 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1981WLN178

..... well whose names had not been received from employment exchange. copies of the resoultions were sent to the deputy commissioner as required by subsection (2) of section 30 of the municipal act, deputy commissioner respondent stayed implementation of the resolutions vide memorandum no. lfs/767, dated 6th may, 1970 annexure d and sent for the relevant files. ..... exchange no matter whether he is fit for the job or not, nor is any appointment made without complying with the provisions of section 4 rendered invalid. section 7 of the employment exchange act, 1959 provides for penalties and it is only the failure to notify the vacancies that has been made punishable.in this case of ..... in a series of judgments reported in nand kishore sakarlal v. state of gujarat 1967 (2) ll j 806. the cosmopolitan club, madras v. the district employment officer, madras 1968 (1) lab. i. c. 599. the muncipal committee, amritsar v. the state of punjab 1971 (2) slr 420, consistent view has been taken that there cannot .....

Ram Bharose Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2(1989)WLN(Rev)436

..... refer the question to the jagir commissioner. respondent mahant ram swaroop claimed the property as his personal property and filed an application on 28-09-1967, under section 23 of the act for declaration of the disputed-: property as his personal property. the jagir commissioner sent his application to the collector for enquiry and report. the collector jagir ..... of respondent ram swaroop as such it may be declared as personal property in the same capacity. tehsildar. jaipur also, after enquiry, sent his report on 09-01-1968. how ever, the jagir commissioner after perual of the entire documents and evidence produced by the parties, was of the view that the entire grant belongs to the ..... given therein. our attention has been drawn to the case of board of revenue and ors. v. rao baldeo singh and ors : [1968]2scr661 , which was a case under the ame act. this was also a case in which the revenue board had set-aside the order of the additional jagir commissioner and remanded the case to .....

Mahant Ram Swaroop Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1986(1)WLN739

..... person, the same are not envisaged and contemplated to be decided by the jagir commissioner under the scope of inquiry to be made under sub-section (2) of section 23 of the act. mr. agrawal placed reliance on the following observations made by a full bench of board of revenue in state of rajasthan v. sardar singh ..... in this estate are of these two religious institutions and as such the claim of mahant ram swaroop for declaring them as his personal property under section 23 of the act, 1952 is not substantiated and is accordingly disallowed.5. both the petitioner and the state government aggrieved against the aforesaid order of the jagir ..... of samvat 1893 (annexure 'a'). the entries of this patta had been affirmed by the archives department, bikaner from their old records vide letter dated august 14, 1968, addressed to the collector, jaipur from the director rajasthan rajya abhi-lekhagar, rajasthan, bikaner in regard to declaration of chhota ramdwara as the personal property of mahant .....

Ram Bharose and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN826

..... refer the question to the jagir commissioner. respondent mahant ram swaroop claimed the property as his personal property and filed an application on 28-09-1967, under section 23 of the act for declaration of the disputed property as his personal property. the jagir commissioner sent his application to the collector for enquiry and report. the collector jagir sent ..... of respondent ram swaroop, as such it may be declared as personal property in the same capacity. tehsildar, jaipur also, after enquiry, sent his report on 09-01-1968. however, the jagir commissioner after perusal of the entire documents and evidence produced by the parties, was of the view that the entire grant belongs to the temple of ..... there in. our attention has been drawn to the case of board of revenue and ors. v. rao baldeo singh and ors. air 1968 sc 897, which was a case under the same act. this was also a case in which the revenue board had set-aside the order of the additional jagir commissioner and remanded the case to .....

Bhilwara Sahkari Upbhokta Wholesale Bhandar Ltd. and anr. Vs. Prescrib ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982WLN478

..... bank ltd v. balichand jugraj jain : [1969]1scr887 , the supreme court was dealing with the provisions of the maharashtra co-operative societies act, 1961. section 91 (1) of the said act made provision for reference of disputes touching the constitution, elections of the office bearers, management or business of the society to the registrar for arbitration ..... v. additional industrial tribunal, andra pradesh 1970 sc 245 the supreme court was dealing with the provisions of the andhra pradesh co-operative societies act, 1964. section 61 of the said act contained a provision with regard to reference of the disputes touching the constitution, management or the business of the society to the registrar of co ..... no. 156/77.3. bhupalsingh, respondent no. 2 in civil writ petition no. 157/77, entered the service of the sahkari bbandar on february 2, 1968 and during the period from july 1, 1972 to february 2, 1975 he was working as accountant with the sahkari bhandar. it is alleged that during the .....

Ram Dayal and ors. Vs. Smt. Kisturi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1970Raj246; 1970(3)WLN83

..... 2, 1950, published in rajasthan gazette extraordinary part i, dated june 14, 1950, the government of rajasthan in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 and sub-section. (1) of section 12 of the rajasthan civil courts ordinance, 1950, directed that with effect from the 1st day of july, 1950, (there shall be?) established the ..... , kotputli, it entertained the execution application, but it would not be a case of exercising jurisdiction by a court which had a total absence of it. in air 1968 mad 99 (supra) the principle of law enunciated in the abovementioned decision was also recognized and it was observed.- 'one point that emerges from this decision is the ..... of the judgment-debtors in two different courts and if the transfer of the decree is not to be insisted upon, neither court would be aware of this act on the part of the decree-holder. but with utmost respect it may be pointed out that such anomalous situation can seldom arise because in the application for .....

Subhan Khan. Vs. State.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... the coagulated juice of the opium poppy. the expression but does not include any preparation containing not more than 0.2% of morphine used in section 2(xv) of the ndps act actually governs the second kind of opium and not the first. this expression but does not include any preparation containing not more than 0.2% of ..... morphine appears in section 2(xv) of the ndps act as also in section 3 of the opium act,1878 and hon'ble apex court examined the definition of 'opium' contained in section 3 of the opium act,1878 in the case of baidyanath mishra and another v. state of orissa-1968 (xxxiv) cuttack law times. section 3(iii) of opium act,1878 reads as ..... under:3. interpretation-clause.(i) ....(ii)....(iii)any mixtyure, with or without neutral material, of any of the above forms of opium, but does not include any preparation containing not more than o.2 per cent of morphine, or a manufactured drug as defined in section .....

Anukampa Avas Vikas Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(3)Raj2295

..... v. union of india and ors. : (1991) 2 scc 407.17. counsel for the respondents has also touched the preliminary objection of availability of alternative remedy under section 83 of the jda act, 1982, of filing a reference application/appeal before the jda appellate tribunal against the order dated 4.3.2006 and has further submitted that the writ petition is ..... rewa choudhary where the status quo was ordered to be in force when the auction was held by the jda.42. supreme court in smt. kalawati v. bisheshwar : air 1968 sc 261 has made distinction between the term 'void' and 'not recognised' on account of the declaration made in the statute, wherein it has been held that the non- ..... as to the effect of the final order passed in revision upholding the permission, on the suit already instituted. in shyam lal v. state of u.p. : air 1968 all 139 a bench of this court has held that orders of stay or injunction are interim orders that merge in final orders passed in the proceedings. the result brought .....