Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: punjab and haryana Page 9 of about 110 results (0.123 seconds)

Haryana Land Reclamation and Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Pawan Ku ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ1198P& H

..... corporation is an industrial establishment regularly engaged in the business of land levelling, land reclamation, production of quality seeds and sale of gypsum and various fertilizers, pesticides, insecticides, etc. the contents of this para have been denied in the written statement. it was clearly averred in paragraph 3 of the written statement that the corporation ..... in the light of heavy financial losses to the corporation during the year 1990-91 and also in view of the fact that sale of fertilisers besides insecticides has been considerably less than anticipated in the last few months, and also due to other economic factors, it had become uneconomical to carry on the business ..... was that he was not given three month's notice in writing nor paid wages in lieu thereof as required by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 25n of the act.the petition was allowed by the learned single judge, vide judgment dated july 15, 1992, holding that the corporation is an industrial establishment and .....

Pawan Kumar Vs. Haryana Land Reclamation and Development Corporation

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1993)105PLR79

..... the respondent-corporation is engaged in the business of land levelling, land reclamation, production of quality seeds and sale of gypsum and various fertilizers, pesticides, insecticides etc. and has a large number of tractors and other allied farm machinery of the said purpose. the gypsum etc. is received in bulks and ..... :-' the corporation is engaged in the business of land levelling, land reclamation, production of quality seeds and sale of gypsum and various fertilizers, pesticides, insecticides etc. and is also having number of tractors and other allied farm machinery engaging number of employees of various categories on regular as well as adhoc/ ..... the aid of power; and, (b) in any part of such premises, including the precints, a 'manufaturing has also been defined in section 2(k) of the factories act. section 2(k) of the factories act is in the following terms:-'(k) 'manufacturing process' means any process for- (i) making, altering, repairing, ornamenting, finishing, packing, oiling .....

Rana Polycot Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Chandigarh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the assessing officer and the tribunal. relying upon judgment of the delhi high court in cit v. hindustan insecticides ltd. [2001] 250 itr 338/116 taxman 406, the claim of the assessee under section 35d(2)(c)(iv) of the act was also disputed. 7. the amount of fees paid to registrar of companies for augmenting the aforesaid share ..... .), expenses incurred on issue of shares or public issue for expansion of existing unit were allowed to be amortized under section 35d(2) (c) (iv) of the act. 9. in so far as pronouncement of delhi high court in hindustan insecticides ltd.'s case (supra), on which revenue has placed reliance is concerned, that was a case relating to ..... section 35d(2)(c)(iii) of the act which is different in its applicability from section 35d(2)(c)(iv) of the act. thus, the argument of the revenue cannot be accepted. .....

Gopal Krishan Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... malhotra, dag, punjab. ***** ram chand gupta, j.(oral) the present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under section 438 of code of criminal procedure in fir no.67 dated 14.08.2012, under sections 9/13/17/18/23 of the insecticide act, 1968 and section 420 ipc, registered at police station tappa manda, district barnala. this court while issuing notice of motion on 06 ..... 21.3.2013 and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the arresting officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under section 438(2) cr.p.c. it has been contended by learned counsel for respondent-state that petitioner has not joined the investigation despite taking 2/3 opportunities. on the last .....

D.K. Goel and Another Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , punjab. . . . mahesh grover, j (oral) 1. this revision petition is directed against orders dated 5.3.2010 and 22.2.2013 whereby the petitioner has been convicted under section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years.2. a sample of butachlor was seized from the dealer s authorized stock. the pesticide, manufactured by .....

Rajinder Kumar and Another Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... m.m.s.bedi present: mr.vikas mohan gupta, advocate, for the petitioners.m.m.s.bedi, j (oral).counsel for the petitioners submits that giving benefit of section 30 (3) of the insecticides act, proceedings have been quashed qua the other partners of m/s mada mal chunni lal, grain market, maur mandi, bathinda. petitioners claim that they were not present on ..... other court. it will be open to the trial court to record the evidence in presence of counsel for the petitioners after exempting their personal appearance following the procedure under section 273 cr.p.c.it will not be proper for this court to enter into the disputed questions of fact that the petitioners had ceased to be partners along with .....

Present: Mr.Arun Chandra Advocate Vs. Union of India

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... kumar 2014.07.30 11:47 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document crm-m-13054-2013 2 section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 for violation of section 3(k) and 17 of the act against m/s crystal phosphates ltd.(hereinafter referred to as 'company').sh.arvind kumar tyagi its director and the petitioner ..... . counsel for the petitioner contends that the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner are unsustainable as the same are barred for want of sanction under section 31 of the act. it is submitted that as per annexure p3 titled 'consent for prosecution', sh.a.k.singh, director of agriculture, haryana accorded permission for ..... the petitioner was sought to be prosecuted for the offence committed by the company without any sanction to prosecute him, in compliance with provisions of section 31 of the act interpreted in the aforesaid judgments, i find force in the contentions of the petitioner that criminal proceedings initiated against him cannot be allowed to continue .....

Present:- Mr. Paras Talwar Advocate Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... by the petitioner after loosing his case before the two courts below. the petitioner was convicted by the trial court for an offence under section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 (here-in-after referred to as `the act, 1968') and thereafter, he filed an appeal before the additional sessions judge, sirs.against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28 ..... sample of quinalphos 25% ec and sent the same to senior analyst, quality control laboratory, sirs.which was found to be misbranded. the accused were summoned under section 29 of the act, kaur gurpreet 2013.08.26 10:31 crl. rev. no.789 o 2. i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court, chandigarh ..... 1968 and after framing of charges, accused o.p.arora, partner of the manufacturing firm, was acquitted but the present petitioner-raj kumar arora was held guilty and .....

Shiv Kumar and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... means 'to goad or urge forward to provoke, incite, urge, encourage to do an act.' keeping in view the above noted interpretation of the abatement, instant is a case, none of the provisions of section 107 ipc which could further make out a case under section 306 ipc have been attracted in the case in hand. hon'blethe supreme court in ..... or provoked the deceased to commit suicide and has not done any act which could be said to have facilitated the commission of suicide by the deceased. in that case also, the appellant was convicted under section 498-a ipc but was acquitted for the offence under section 306 ipc. in the present case also, there is no such allegation ..... to the doing of that thing; or thirdly, intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing. 12. in rameshkumar v state of chhattisgarh (2001) 9 scc 618, this court while considering the charge framed and the conviction for an offence under section 306 i.p.c. on the basis of dying declaration recorded by .....

Present: Mr. Rahul Vats Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the deceased. this is not a case of a married woman, who having been subjected to a continuous treatment of torture, had ended her life. no presumption under section 113a of the evidence act arises in such a case. here is a case of a woman whose modesty was outraged while she was with her paramour. there was neither any intention nor ..... hanging herself to the ceiling fan. in this case 5-6 days prior to the incident, the accused had outraged the modesty of the deceased for which offence under section 354, ipc, was registered. it was held that said act of the accused could not be construed as an abetment to the deceased to commit suicide and for that reason conviction under ..... of the legislature and the ratio of the above-cited cases is clear that in order to convict a person under section 306, ipc, there has to be a clear mens rea to commit the offence. it also requires an active act or virendra singh adhikari 2014.06.10 15:55 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high .....