Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: punjab and haryana Page 8 of about 110 results (0.110 seconds)

Present: Mr.P.S. Khurana Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .2008 filed by the respondent against the petitioner and others for an offence punishable under section 3(k)(i).17, 18 and 33 punishable under crl. misc. not m-16856 o 2. section 29(1) of insecticides act, 1968 read with rule 27(5) of insecticide rules 1971 (annexure p-1) as also the summoning order dated 11.08.2008 ..... notice to the petitioner and others.learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that for possessing misbranded intoxicants the complaint was filed by state through sandeep kumar , insecticide inspector, abohar against the petitioner and others.according to him, the magistrate did not pass a speaking order on 11.08.2008 while issuing notice to the ..... 11.2008. although examination of the complainant is not a condition precedent in a case brought by a public servant in discharge of his official duties, yet section 200 cr.p.c.does not dispense with the requirement of the magistrate satisfying himself about there being a case for proceeding against the accused. the order .....

Harjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : I(1999)DMC368

..... code was not made out. in the case in hand, however, the doctor categorically found that the death was due to the intake of organo phosphorus group in insecticide.18. joginder singh pw 2 stated in cross-examination that he had talk with the father of surinder kaur regarding maltreatment. they did not meet any respectable of the ..... . dead body was subjected to post-mortem examination. it may be mentioned here that the cause of death was found to be the intake of organo phosphorus group of insecticide. cause of death, thus, was not dysentery or vomiting.15. it was submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that there is no evidence that smt. surinder ..... the accused the offence of dowry death or the commission of suicide on the abetment of her husband and his relative that the legislature introduced sections 113-a and 113-b in the evidence act.section 113-a reads as follows :'presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman--when the question is whether the commission of suicide .....

Shyam Sunder Aggarwal and Another Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... rigmarole of a criminal trial. 9. the submission on behalf of the petitioners were that the provisions contained in the insecticide act and the food adulteration act are pari materia and clause 4 of section 17 of the act specifically provides that if the offence is committed by a company then it has to be proved that the offence ..... specific allegations in the complaint and the order be set aside. it was urged that section 33 of the insecticide act is pari materia with the provisions contained in the food adulteration act. it was urged that under section 20-a of the food adulteration act, the court has the power to summon the additional accused but there has to ..... was taken in the presence of the witness whose names and addresses are given below. the certificate of the public analyst haryana chandigarh admissible under section 13(5) of the act is attached here with which shows that the sample is coloured with prohibited material yellow synthetic colour where as it should be free from the same .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Punjab State Co-operative Supply and Ma ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1998)148CTR(P& H)151

..... the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in law in holding that the profit of rs. 30,182 arising to the assessee from trading in insecticides was exempted from it act, 1961?(3) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in law in holding that no apportionment between ..... society engaged in the purchase to agricultural implements, seeds, live-stock or other articles intended for agriculture. shri sawhney has argued that the assessee- society had not purchased insecticides for supply to the members of the co-operative societies but for trading, and, therefore, the assessee-society was not entitled to the benefit under s. 81(i ..... )(d) of the act. as regards question no. 3, the apportionment of the expenditure is the subject of controversy.3. looking to the nature of the controversy, we find it appropriate, .....

Royal Overseas Khosa Pando Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)3PLR201

..... document which constitutes the bargain regarding the security, is also necessary and operates to create the charge in conjunction with the deposit, it requires registration under section 17. registration act, 1908 as a non-testamentary instrument creating an interest in immovable property, where the value of such property is one hundred rupees and upwards. the ..... dismissed. she has emphasised that circular dated 11.9.1979 (r-1) is confined only to purchase of inputs like crop loan on fertilizers, insecticides, pesticides, weedicides and seeds.4. in order to determine the controversy raised in the instant petition it would be necessary to make a reference to the provisions ..... whether the memorandum signed and delivered by a borrower and relied upon by the lender evidencing the creation of a mortgage was compulsorily registrable under section 17 of the registration act, 1908. a large sum was found due to the lender and the borrower has raised the demand for its repayment. the borrower handed over .....

Present: Mr. R.Santhanam Advocate with Vs. Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , therefore, issuance of show cause notice for interest on the delayed payment should also be within a period of one year as stipulated under section 11-a of the act. therefore, department has absolutely no jurisdiction to issue show cause notice after expiry of the period of limitation for interest on the delayed payment ..... , however, submits that order passed by the high court of delhi, is incorrect as it has not taken into consideration provisions of section 11a read with section 11ab of the central excise act, 1944 and as, admittedly, duty was paid after delay, the appeal should be dismissed and reliance should not be placed upon judgment ..... read with section 11ab of the central excise act, 1944?. . counsel for the appellant submits that the questions so framed arise from a common order passed by the cestat against the appellant and another assessee m/s hindustan insecticides ltd.the appellant filed the present appeal before this court whereas m/s hindustan insecticides ltd., filed .....

M/S B.R.Agrotech Limited and Another Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... then the shelf life of the sample had already expired and hence, the right of the petitioners to seek re-analysis of the sample under section 24 (4) of the insecticide act, 1968 (the act for short) stood frustrated. learned state counsel, on the other hand, has opposed the petition. after hearing learned counsel for the petitioners as ..... (o&m) 3 already expired. section 24 (4) of the act reads as under:- report of insecticide analyst: (4) unless the sample has already been tested or analysed in the central insecticides laboratory, where a person has under sub - section (3) notified his intention of adducing evidence in controversion of the insecticide analyst's report, the court may, ..... its own motion or in its discretion at the request either of the complainant or of the accused, cause the sample of the insecticide produced before the magistrate under sub - section (6) of section 22 to be sent for test or analysis to the said laboratory, (which shall, within a period of thirty days, which .....

Present: Mr. Dinesh Goyal Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 for quashing of the complaint no.323/2 dated 20.7.2007 under section 3k (i).17, 18, 29, 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 ('act' for short) (annexure p-12) and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom including the summoning order dated 20.7.2007 (annexure p-13) and order dated ..... would be nothing but an abuse of process of law. accordingly, this petition is allowed. complaint no.323/2 dated 20.7.2007 under section 3k (i).17, 18, 29, 33 of the act (annexure p-12) and all the consequential proceedings, arising therefrom, including the summoning order dated 20.7.2007 (annexure p-13).qua the ..... m/s rawat kheti centre, bassian on 7.6.2005. from the said firm insecticide manufactured by m/s excel crop care limited, mumbai, was recovered. samples were drawn from the said insecticide. however, when the samples were sent for analysis, the insecticide inspector reported that the samples did not conform to relevant is specification in respect of .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Beco Engineering Co.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1998]232ITR102(P& H)

..... the supreme court took a view contrary to the one taken by the andhra pradesh high court in agro insecticides and allied industries' case : [1981]127itr796(ap) . interpreting sections 33 and 34 read with the explanation to section 34, which was added by the finance act of 1966, it was held (page 197) :'having considered the matter at some length in the present ..... made in the year or years in which, either the whole or a part of the development rebate reserve is to be allowed in terms of sub-section (2) of section 33 of the act, or in any earlier previous year which is not a year earlier to the year in which the machinery or plant, etc., was installed or first ..... development reserve in the year in which it did not make the profits.4. aggrieved against the order of the tribunal, the revenue filed a petition under section 256(1) of the act, for making a reference of the question of law to the jurisdictional high court, said to be arising from the order of the tribunal. the tribunal, accordingly .....

(2) Notwithstanding Anything Contained in Sub-section (1) Vs. State of ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the ground that he is not described as the person responsible for the conduct of the business of the company. section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968, reads as under: 33. offences by companies.-(1) whenever an offence under this act has been committed by a company, every person who at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of ..... i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh crm-m-36764 of2010-2- (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1).where an offence under this act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is ..... of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly: provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any punishment under this act if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission .....