Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: mumbai Page 2 of about 276 results (0.078 seconds)

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Devidas Kishanrao More and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... 2, accused shivaji had caught neck of the deceased narayan in the courtyard of house. he sat on the person of deceased narayan. there was endrine i.e. insecticide in bottle, in the hand of accused devidas, and accused vishnu was also present there. thereafter, pw-2 went to call his brother venkati. he narrated incident ..... father of the complainant namely narayan and as a result of it, narayan died. accordingly, offence was registered bearing crime no.78/1995 for the offence punishable under section 302 r/w. 34 of i.p. code. after investigation, the charge sheet was filed, and after full-fledged trial, the trial court acquitted the respondents. hence ..... the case is vitiated by some manifest illegality or the conclusion recorded by the court below is such which could not have been possibly arrived at by any court acting reasonably and judiciously and is, therefore, liable to be characterised as perverse, then, to prevent miscarriage of justice, the appellate court is obliged to interfere. ? .....

Padmavati Oils (India) Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... as 1999 (8) scc 190 [state of haryana vs. unique farmaid private limited] the provisions of insecticides act, 1978 are considered and discussed. in that case, the expiry date was very much relevant as effectiveness of insecticides due to its component needs to be ascertained. it was case of misbranding. the learned counsel placed reliance ..... in charge of any food laboratory (by whatever designation he is known) recognised by the central government, for the purposes of this section." "section 114, illustration (e) of the evidence act is also available for use of the report of public analyst. the rules of evidence, the procedure given in cr.p.c. ..... represented to be; (b) ........... (k) if the article contains any prohibited preservative or permitted preservative in excess of the prescribed limits;" "the term 'misbranded' is defined in section 2(ix) and the relevant portion for the present matters is as under:- "2. (ix) "misbranded"- an article of food shall be deemed to be misbranded - (a .....

Raja Kulkarni Vs. State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1951Bom105; (1951)53BOMLR333; ILR1951Bom318

..... case where the provision of an appeal was made after the proceedings had started. i doubt if a finality is at all given to an award made under the act. sections 116 & 116a illustrate this point. the case of a decree of a civil ct. is different from that of an award & this is explained in industrial ..... cannot possibly be attacked on the ground that it contravenes the provisions of the constitution.19. ifc is said, however, that the provisions of section 30 & section 27a of the industrial relations act are ultra vires of the legislature, inasmuch as they exclude from representation before the industrial ct. all unions other than the representative unions. mr. ..... a representative union the-e are certain conditions which must be satisfied before a union acquires the status of a representative union. this will be apparent from section 13 of the act. it appears that there are about 2 lacs of textile workers & the rashtriya hill mazdoor sangh represents 15 per cent. of the membership. it is .....

Bombay Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and 14 Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1992LC278(Bombay); 1982(10)ELT171(Bom)

..... published a notification on march 1, 1961 in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the customs act, 1962 granting exemption to chemicals for the manufacture of insecticides, pesticides and fungicides falling under item no. 28 of the first schedule to the indian tariff act, 1934. as the claim in the petition centres round upon the terms of this ..... and insurance) new delhi, the 1st march, 1968 notification ------------ customso.s.h. no. in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the customs act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the central government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts chemicals for the manufacture of insecticides, pesticides and fungicides and falling under item .....

Godrej Agrovet Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... is pending in the court of jmfc badnapur. the case is filed by respondent no.2, public servant for offences punishable under various sections of insecticides act, 1968 and rules framed under the act. both sides are heard. 2] copy of the complaint given by public servant shows that on 31/7/02, the inspector appointed under ..... was containing 33.74% of the substance as against 36% s.l. shown on the label. thus, the insecticide was found to be misbranded as per the provision of section 3(k) (1) of insecticides act, 1968. after collecting the information from rama sales corporation, notices were issued to all the accused who include manufacturer and private ..... be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. 7] the aforesaid provision shows that the insecticides act, 1968 has additional provision and that makes distinction between the provisions of this act and the provision of section 141 of n.i.act. further, the documents like reply given by shri r.k.bansal shows that he had personal .....

Mr. Arvind Navinchandra Mafatlal, Chairman Emeritus of Nocil Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR1880

..... gupta on behalf of nocil. according to the complainant the nocil has replied to the secretary, central insecticides board, new delhi on 6th august 1984 that they had not secured a certificate of registration under the insecticides act either for import or manufacture of indigenous manufacture of glyphosate. it has been admitted that the distribution of ..... legal adviser and the secretary of the company and therefore was not covered by a definition of 'officer in default' as provided in section 5 of the companies act, set aside the order of issuance of process against the said accused. the learned revisional court however upheld the order of issuing process so ..... third party and marketing the same with a deceptive name 'weedall' without the consent of the complainants and therefore committed the offences punishable under the aforesaid sections.3. on the complaint being presented, the learned magistrate vide order dated 20th june 2006 found that the offences were not disclosed in the complaint .....

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

..... minerals, licence is necessary under the off-shore areas mineral (development & regulation) act, 2002. to manufacture, sale, purchase, possession, consumption or use of intoxicant for ..... is mandatory under section 22 of the banking regulation act, 1949. under the cantonments act, 2006, licence is mandatory for establishment of a private market or slaughter house in the cantonment area. to carry on food business licence under section 31 of the food safety & standards act, 2006 is mandatory. to manufacture, sale and distribution of insecticides, licence is mandatory under section 13 of the insecticides act, 1968. to explore .....

industrial Minerals and ors. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(112)LC152Tri(Mum.)bai

..... and a warning about its toxicity, and directions for administration of antidotes. copper sulphate figures as an insecticide in the schedule to the insecticide act, 1968. the appellant is registered with the insecticide board as a manufacturer of insecticide and it is stated that he is permitted to sell the goods only to dealers who are registered ..... 10 covers goods which are generically pesticides specifying the various categories such as insecticide rondenticide, fungicides etc. "put up in forms or packing for retail sale or as preparations or articles (for example, sulphur-treated bands, wicks and candles ..... asst. commissioner that the product is classifiable in heading 2833.00 of the tariff as an inorganic chemical not as claimed by the appellant as an insecticide in heading 3808.10.2. we have heard mr. a.k. saraf, the partner of the appellant and the departmental representative.3. heading 3808. .....

industrial Minerals and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... and a warning about its toxicity, and directions for administration of antidotes. copper sulphate figures as an insecticide in the schedule to the insecticide act, 1968. the appellant is registered with the insecticide board as a manufacturer of insecticide and it is stated that he is permitted to sell the goods only to dealers who are registered ..... 10 covers goods which are genetically pesticides specifying the various categories such as, insecticide, rondenticide, fungicides etc. "put up in forms or packing for retail sale or as preparations or articles (for example, sulphur-treated bands, wicks and candles ..... asst. commissioner that the product is classifiable in heading 2833.00 of the tariff as an inorganic chemical not as claimed by the appellant as an insecticide in heading 3808.10.2. we have heard mr. a.k. saraf, the partner of the appellant and the departmental representative.3. heading 3808. .....

Aero Industries Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(116)LC537Tri(Mum.)bai

..... liquid, would be covered as repellents under the entry 37 to the notification which reads as mosquito coils, mats and other mosquito repellants" and the same insecticide acting and delivered in same fashion could not be a repellant and covered by that entry.(f) the appellants have tried to distinguish between ..... mosquito repellant'. further there is nothing on record which can conclusively prove the disputed product is a 'mosquito killer'.while these findings sustain the levy of duty under section 4a notification on the basis of mr.p. declared, these findings ipso facto will not be applicable to uphold the mandatory penalty equivalent to the duty. there ..... was substituted by the word "control". the substitution of the world "control" for repellant apparently has been made to place the product out of the purview of section 11a, though there was no change in the formulations and composition. since the product has been marketed as "repellant and ultimate customers by the product as repellant, .....