Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: mumbai goa Page 1 of about 1 results (0.112 seconds)

Jan 10 2014 (HC)

Miss Rashika @ Rishigandha Shetye Vs. the State of Goa

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... police. this evidence is also material as it is in corroboration with the contents of suicide note. the statements of both pw2 and pw3 were recorded under section 164 of the criminal procedure code and those statements are proved by examination of the magistrate. they are consistent with oral evidence of pw2 and pw3 on material points. ..... be suggestive of the consequence. yet a reasonable certainty to incite the consequence must be capable of being spelt out. where the accused had, by his acts or omission or by a continued course of conduct, created such circumstances that the deceased was left with no other option except to commit suicide, in which case ..... bench, r.c. lahoti, j. (as his lordship then was) said that instigation is to goad, urge forward, provoke, incite or encourage to do an act?. to satisfy the requirement of instigation?, though it is not necessary that actual words must be used to that effect or what constitutes instigation? must necessarily and specifically .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2012 (HC)

Madan Malji Kambli and Others Vs. State of Goa, Through Its Chief Secr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... the state of goa. at the same time, the state government declared that in its opinion, sub-section 1 of section 17 of the l.a act is applicable and, therefore, by virtue of sub-section 4 of section 17 of the l.a act, section 5-a thereof shall not apply in respect of the said acquisition. 7} it is the case of ..... of the executive power of the union government is permissible hereunder. in appreciating the above submission made on behalf of the petitioners it may be seen that section 3(ee) of the act defines the expression appropriate government to mean, in relation to the acquisition of land for the purposes of the union, the central government, and in ..... angrup thakar and ors vs. state of punjab and anr reported in air 1968 delhi 97. 39} without prejudice to these submissions and alternatively mr.sonak submits that there is no case made out for invoking the urgency clause and particularly section 17 of the l.a act, 1894. the delay in acquiring the lands and for undertaking the project .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //