Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: himachal pradesh Page 3 of about 24 results (0.033 seconds)

Sep 10 1971 (HC)

Km. Manju and anr. Vs. State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1972HP37

..... set-up, and these considerations cannot adversely affect the constitutionality of the otherwise valid rule. the problem as noticed in p, rajendran's case. (1968) 2 scr 786 = (air 1968 sc 1012) and as revealed by a large number of cases which have recently come to this court is that the number of candidates desirous of ..... other rules or criteria not contained in these rules. in support of such a principle, the authority cited was: union of india v. anglo afghan agencies, (air 1968 sc 718).12. right of admission to an educational institution, run either by the state or by a state aided institution, is considered sufficiently important to be classified ..... committee, (1952-2 qb 413).' in that case, their lordships inferred that the examinations' committee of the board of high school and intermediate education, appointed under sec. 13 of the u. p. intermediate education act of 1921, when dealing with cases of candidates accused of having used unfair means in the examination hall, had to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2002 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sumitra Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : II(2002)ACC98,2003ACJ262

..... is concerned, it is a whole time job involving huge expenses. it involves many steps like digging of taulias, pruning, providing manure/fertilizers, sprays, checking of weeds arid insecticides is a continuing process and is a whole time job. thus in case the petitioner was earning rs. 150 per day while working as a carpenter and was busy around ..... court under article 227 of the constitution of india should not be so exercised in order to circumvent the statutory provisions contained in a particular act. sub-section (2) of section 173 of the motor vehicles act clearly lays down that no appeal shall lie against any award of a claims tribunal if the amount in dispute in the appeal is less ..... of an inferior court or tribunal shall be final. c. singh v. s. singh air 1979 sc 1 and state of gujarat v. v.v. vaghela air 1968 sc 1481. a duty and responsibility is cast on the high court and is invested with the power of general superintendence to keep the courts and tribunals within its territorial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 2007 (HC)

Mohan Lal Vs. Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ524HP

..... 286.)the authority, therefore, posed unto itself a wrong question. what, therefore, was necessary to be considered by bda was whether the ingredients contained in section 14-a of the act were fulfilled and whether the requirements of the proviso appended thereto are satisfied. if the same had not been satisfied, the requirements of the law must be ..... mind in coming to a fair conclusion on the question.24. it has been held in ram chandra chaudhuri v. secretary to govt. of west bengal and ors. 1968-ii-llj-376 (cal) that:point (3). conscious as i am that a plea of mala fide rarely succeeds i find that in the present case, the ..... extent on the facts and circumstances of that case, the framework of, the statute under which the enquiry is held. the old distinction between a judicial act and an administrative act has withered away. even an administrative order which involves civil consequences must be consistent with the rules of natural justice.the expression 'civil consequences' encompasses .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 1982 (HC)

Durga Dass Bansal Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1983CriLJ419

..... out in proper bags and sent to the government analyst immediately and so there was no defect in taking and packing of the samples. under sub-section (3) of section 23 of the act, it is the duty of the inspector of effectively seal each portion, of the sample. there is nothing on the record to show that it ..... summoning him as an accused.3. the first contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no standard has been laid down for bleaching powder under the act. it is section 3 (b) which defines the 'drug' thus:drug' includes-(i) all medicines for internal or external use of human beings or animals and all substances intended ..... the extent and subject to the conditions specified in that schedule. section 18 of the act falls under chap. iv of the act. item 12 of sch. 'k' exempts 'substances intended to be used for destruction of vermin or insects which cause disease in human beings or animals, viz. insecticides and disinfectants.25. since i have already held bleaching powder not .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //