Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: himachal pradesh Page 2 of about 24 results (0.036 seconds)

Bakshi Sita Ram Vs. Lachhmi Chand and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1954HP4

..... zeal was in the right direction. i hold therefore that the remarks in question were uncalled-for, and that, under the inherent power vested in this court under section 561a, criminal p. c., the remarks ought to be ordered to be expunged.9. the revision is allowed to this extent only that the following passages occurring in ..... to catch him offering bribe. true, there is only the solitary statementof the petitioner regarding this second offer by the respondent, so that a court might hesitate to act on it in determining the guilt of the accused, but, for passing a sentence on the conduct of the petitioner, the court was not justified, in the ..... the dak bungalow were a magistrate and two police officers. the learned sessions judge dubbed the petitioner's evidence as evidence of an accomplice which could not be acted upon without corroboration. of this corroboration the learned sessions judge found none because, in his opinion, the police officers neither saw nor heard anything, and the magistrate .....

Sat Pal Vs. Smt. Sunaina Devi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(1)ShimLC102

..... under sub-clause (a) of clause (1) of section 15 of the 1949 act. all the aforesaid judgments of this court took the view that the aforesaid section 15 of 1949 act empowering the state government to issue notification was in pari materia to section 24 of 1987 act. relying upon section 23 of the himachal pradesh general clauses act, 1968, it was held accordingly by this court that ..... by various judges of this court in the past that no notification under section 24 (1)(a) of 1987 act having been issued and the aforesaid notification issued on 15.3.1950 under the aforesaid 1949 act being applicable and held that by virtue of section 23 of himachal pradesh general clauses act, 1968, the appeal preferred by the petitioner in that case before the district .....

Surinder Kumar and ors. Vs. Land Acquisition Collector, Hp Pwd Central ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... the bye-pass road the claimants land has resulted into severance and division into two parts. the state has enacted the himachal pradesh roadside land control act, 1968. under the said act, construction activity to the extent of five meters width from the edge of the road has been prohibited. hence the value of the claimants unacquired ..... and rs. 10,000/- per marla for gair mumkin category of land. the compensation amount being not acceptable, the claimants filed land reference petitions under section 18 of the act seeking enhancement of the same.3. the court below, based on the pleadings of the parties framed the following issues:1. whether collector land acquisition ..... been conferred upon a court to be exercised judicially i.e. upon taking into consideration the relevant factors.34. the reasoning in narasaiah case (supra) that section 51-a enables the party producing the certified copy of a sale transaction to rely on the contents of the document without having to examine the vendee or .....

GurnaraIn Suri and Company Vs. H.P. State Co-operative Bank Ltd. and a ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)ShimLC175

..... iv) any co-operative society registered or deemed to have been registered under the h.p. co-operative societies act, 1968.there is no dispute that respondent no. 1 is a co-operative society under the h.p. co-operative societies act, 1968. the parties are also not at issue that the premises in dispute is owned by respondent no. 1 ..... government, by notification, to be an urban area for the purposes of rent act. the public premises act, on the contrary, will apply to 'public premises defined in clause (e) of the public premises act. as per sub-section (2) of section 3 of the rent act said act is not applicable to any building or rented land owned by government and under ..... of the grievance of the petitioner was against the notice dated 22.2.1994 and another notice dated 22.9.1994 issued by the society under section 106 of the transfer of property act for terminating tenancy of the petitioner and calling him to surrender the possession on or before 1.11.1994. on those facts this court has held .....

Himachal Conductors Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Deputy Excise and Ta ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [1978]42STC440(HP)

..... referred notification (annexure c) on 27th may, 1974. this notification is in the following terms :in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 42 of the himachal pradesh general sales tax act, 1968, the governor, h. p., with a view to providing incentive to the small-scale industries, is pleased to grant exemption from payment of ..... rules framed by the government on 12th april, 1971 and the subsequent notification issued on 27th may, 1974, by the state government under section 42 of the himachal pradesh general sales tax act, 1968.2. short facts of the case are that petitioner no. 1 is a private limited company which has established an industry at saproon in ..... by virtue of the powers which it has got under sub-section (1) of section 42 of the himachal pradesh general sales tax act, 1968. a copy of this notification is found at annexure c in the record of this case. section 42(1) of the himachal pradesh general sales tax act, as it stood in the year 1974, was in .....

Jiwan Singh Joginder Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)ShimLC502

deepak gupta, j.1. the present case involves the interpretation of section 5-a of the h.p. general sales tax act, 1968 (act no. 24 of 1968) (hereinafter referred to as the act).2. the petitioner firm in the writ petition had also challenged the constitutional validity of the aforesaid section. at the time of hearing of the petition, this point was not ..... petitioner then purchases the maize on behalf of the principal and sends it to the principal. according to the petitioner, no tax is payable on this transaction.section 7 of the act reads as follows:7. tax free goods.--(1) no tax shall be payable on the sale of goods specified in the first column of schedule 'b', subject ..... m/s. sukhjit starch & chemicals ltd. the maize was purchased directly from the farmer and as such was exempt from payment of tax in terms of section 7 of the act. even if the converse situation is accepted and it is found that the petitioner purchased the maize on his own behalf and thereafter sold it outside the state .....

Dhyan Singh Vs. Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1976HP64

..... had been published the petitioner applied on january 12, 1971, for the reservation of land for the extension of his abadi. the application was made under section 42 of the act to the director, consolidation of holdings. it was recited that khasra nos. 10623/6564 and 11887/10626 11887/10626 were previously owned and possessed by the ..... right because it was a part of a procedure deliberately adopted by the director, and the procedure had a statutory basis inasmuch as it was implied within section 54 that the director could adopt such procedure as he considered fit. it is not correct to say that the director had no power to direct issue of ..... 1957 mys 12 and t. venkatasubbiah setty v. commr., corporation of the city of bangalore, air 1968 mys 251 do not assist the respondents.5. it is pointed out that the himachal pradesh holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1971 does not contain any provision for an application for restoration of a revision petition dismissed in default .....

Bhagat Ram Vs. Smt. Lilawati Galib

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1972HP125

..... any tenant (including a tenant whose tenancy is terminated).'9. it was found that the court, without applying its mind as to whether conditions laid down under section 13 of that act were fulfilled, proceeded to record the compromise between the parties and the decree in terms of the compromise was passed whereby the tenant was to be ejected. ..... kaushalya devi v. k. l. bansal, air 1970 sc 838. in both these cases their lordships were considering the language used in section 13 of the delhi and aimer rent control act. 1952. that section stood in the following terms:'notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law or any contract, no decree or order for the ..... efflux of time and possession has to be delivered to the decree-holder. in this connection, reference can be made to konchada ramamurty subudhi v. gopinath naik, air 1968 sc 919. in that case even the word 'rent' was used in the compromise and still their lordships did not spell out a fresh lease, but considered that .....

Mangheru Etc. Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh and ors. Etc.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1982HP1

..... to intervene in view of the fact that similar points were raised by them in other writ petitions.5. the himachal pradesh nautor land rules, 1968 define what a nautor land is. rule 3 is the definition section. clause (a) of this rule defines nautor land thus:' 'nautor land' means the right to utilize, with the sanction of the competent ..... looked at from another perspective. the order of grant under rule 16 and the subsequent execution of a patta on payment of dues under rule 18 are two separate acts. the arbitration clause is not contained in the rules and until and unless patta is granted the arbitration clause is not binding on the parties. the patta specifically lays ..... a sufficiently long period of time. however, once the fraud is uncovered then action is required to be taken within a reasonable time thereafter. article 56 of the limitation act lays down a limitation of three years from the date of the knowledge of fraud, and we are of the opinion that it will be reasonable to lay down .....

Balwinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (1999)IILLJ1116HP

..... of the constitution of india. a plea of implied consent and concurrence by those authorities has also been urged incidentally. as for the claim under section 25-f of the industrial disputes act, is concerned, the learned senior counsel for the respondents contended that the third respondent temple having regard to the nature and functions carried on in ..... created before the appointment or simultaneously, with it. a constitution bench of the apex court, in a decision reported in state of assam v. kanak chandra dutta, (1968-i-llj-288) (sc) has observed that a post is employment but that every employment is not a post and casual labourer is not a holder of a post ..... termination of the services of the petitioner.8. coming to the question of applicability or otherwise of the provisions of the industrial disputes act and the claim projected under section 25-f of the act as we are of the view that for the reasons already set out supra the petitioner cannot make any legitimate grievance of any .....