Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: gujarat Page 9 of about 108 results (0.050 seconds)

Ramubhai Dahyabhai Rathod Vs. Surat Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2000Guj292; (2000)3GLR2679

..... in the original plot, which has been reconstituted are determined and the reconstituted plot has become subject to the right stated by the town planning officer. under section 54 (old act) any person who is continuing to occupy any land which he is not entitled to occupy under the final scheme is required to be evicted by the ..... -petitioner herein who had no legal and valid possession in this behalf. the learned counsel also referred to the provisions of the old town planning act i.e. town planning act 1955, particularly section 54 and rule 21 of the rules, particularly prior to its amendment and after its amendment & rule 27 and also relied upon the corresponding ..... mr. kamal. b. trivedi and mr. prashant g. desai, learned counsels have appeared for the corporation. the learned counsel stated that in this case on 10-5-1968 the state government has notified and sanctioned the draft town planning scheme no. 8 in connection with the land in question. on 4-8-68 the state government sanctioned .....

Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1991(54)ELT30(Guj); (1991)1GLR498

..... that there should be manufacture of goods. the goods being articles which are known to those who are dealing in the market having their identity as such. section 3 of the act enjoins that there shall be levied and collected in such manner as may be prescribed duties of excise on all excisable goods other than salt which are produced ..... ordinary sense, will not be available. it is only with this limited purpose that the legislature, in our opinion, inserted this definition of the word 'manufacture' in the definition section and not with a view to make the mere 'processing of goods as liable to excise duty.' the aforesaid judgment is followed by the supreme court in the case of ..... of union of india v. delhi cloth & general mills - air 1963 sc 791; south bihar sugar mills ltd. v. union of india - 1978 (2) elt (j 336) (sc) = air 1968 sc 922, and union carbide india ltd. v. union of india - 1986 (24) elt 169 (sc) = air 1986 sc 1097. the court further held that the essential ingredient for excise .....

Pranlal Chimanlal Thakore Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1994)121CTR(Guj)318; [1995]212ITR362(Guj)

..... upon whom and the situations and stages at which it can levy tax. 31. considering the aforesaid settled law, in our view, the constitutionality of section 244(1a) of the income-tax act is required to be presumed. it cannot be said that parliament has prescribed the cut-off date arbitrarily or capriciously. the cut-off date was prescribed ..... was ordered to be filed on february 12, 1964. prior to that, the petitioner received a second show-cause notice dated august 27, 1963, under section 148 of the income-tax act in his capacity as the karta and manager of the alleged hindu undivided family of chimanlal narbheram thakore. again the petitioner submitted a return showing the income ..... , in all rs. 26,598.50, from may 25, 1967, to august 8, 1968. it is his contention that by the order dated february 23, 1970, respondent no. 2 had imposed penalty of rs. 10,984 under section 271(1)(a) of the income-tax act. the petitioner had paid the said amount. thereafter, the petitioner had also paid by way .....

Maganbhai Chhotubhai Patel Vs. Maniben

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1985Guj187; (1985)1GLR374; (1985)1GLR374

..... , in reply to the argument of mr. marshal regarding the burden of proof, has relied upon the decision of the supreme court in gopal krishnaji ketkar v. mohamed haji latif : [1968]3scr862 . in the said case, the question was whether the land comprised in survey no. 134 of village wadi of thana district, on a portion of which the dargah of ..... failed to obtain redress from the plaintiff-wife or her father, wrote a- letter ex. 86 to the plaintiff which appears to have been received by her on 4-10-1968. the said letter appears to have been sent from u. s. a., i.e. the permanent address of the defendant-husband, and that it must have been posted somewhere in ..... doing so, the court shall have due regard to the considerations set out in sub-section (2.) or (3) of s. 23 of the act, as the case may be, so far as they are applicable. considerations set out in sub-section (2) of s. 23 of the act and which apply to the instant case are:'23(2) in determining the amount of .....

Jyotiben R. Pathak and ors. Vs. Rafigsa Chammansa Fakir and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2000Guj129; (2000)3GLR169

..... of the matter, he was satisfied that even if all the allegations levelled against the municipality were correct, the case would not fall within the mischief of section 263 of the act and action of dissolution of municipality was uncalled for. in the circumstances, the order passed by the state government was unlawful, illegal and was rightly set ..... aside. it was further submitted that though prayer of the petitioners was only to quash and set aside the order passed by the state government under section 263 of the act, the learned single judge has exceeded his jurisdiction in granting larger and wider relief by directing the authorities to hold election of the president and vice- ..... given and the actual adverse order must proceed with an action inspired notice.' 22. before the learned single judge, a decision in mohanlal v. r.m. desai, (1968) 9 guj lr 991 was also cited. the learned single judge, however, observed that the ratio laid down in mohanlal would not apply to the facts of the case .....

Bai Hiralaxmi and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmeda ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1967Guj198

..... of the interest of the general public. the corporation purports to fix the rate and impose the general tax under the provisions of the act viz., section 129(c) read with section 99 and section 127. therefore even if the effect thereof is to diminish the value of the properties of the tax-payers, the corporation claims to ..... to execute a decree which a landlord has obtained after satisfying the reasonable requirement of the law as enacted in the rent control act. neither section 19 of the act nor any other provision of the act indicates the ground on which the competent authority might grant or withhold permission to execute decree and the power conferred is, therefore ..... of petitions were heard.(2) in the present group of nine petitions, mr. desai, represented petitioners in special civil applications nos. 261 of 1962 and 117 of 1968. in the rest of the petitions mr. mody appeared for the petitioners. in all the petitions, the ahmedabad municipal corporation is joined as respondent no. 1 and .....

Neon Motor Stores and ors. Vs. Alliance Stores Trading Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1974Guj168; (1974)0GLR272

..... in order to appreciate the rival contentions in their proper perspective it will be necessary to refer to the definitions of 'landlord' and 'tenant' as given in the act. section 5(3) states that'landlord means any person who is for the time being, receiving, or entitled to receive, rent in respect of any premises whether on his own ..... was a statutory tenant who had no transferable interest in the lease and, therefore, the defendants were not protected from eviction by the proviso to sub-section (1) to section 15 of the rent act. the plaintiff, therefore, prayed for a decree for eviction against the defendants on the ground of bona he and reasonable requirement, non-payment of ..... authority to assign their interest in favour of a third person.17. similarly, the case of n. m. nayak v. chhotalal hariram, 69 born lr 551 = (air 1968 bom 51), relied upon by mr. shah will not help him. in that case it was observed that 'a person seeking to claim protection afforded by provisions contained in the .....

ishwarbhai Gokulbhai Surti Vs. K.M. Bhatt and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2002(94)FLR1129]; (2002)2GLR1276; (2002)IILLJ233Guj

..... regard to the subject-matter of the petition and that such representation would be considered and the relief if any would be granted under the provisions of section 19a of the act. in view of the said statement, the petitioner has withdrawn the petition at that stage reserving liberty to approach this court again if necessary and ..... to issue commissions for the examination of witnesses just as a civil court has and the proceedings before him are judicial proceedings within the meaning of section 193 and section 228 and section 196, indian penal code. nevertheless, there is no safeguard provided or provision made to enable an employer to have the same facilities of summoning witnesses ..... 14 of the constitution or that it was unreasonable. reliance was placed on the decision of the patna high court in k.l. gupta v. corporation, greater bombay, air 1968 sc 303; chinthalingam v. government of india, 1970 (3) scc 768; and pannalal bindraj v. union of india, air 1957 sc 397. the patna high court .....

New Nandi Seeds Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) X ...

Court : Gujarat

..... rejected lots and losses at processing are returned to farmers only after the foundation seeds are certified as conforming to specifications, the lots are subjected to treatment with insecticides (cell phose, quick phose) and pesticides (thiram and barastin) at the time of packing. the company had filed certificates issued by the seed certification agency and ..... being sown and achieving germination,but in that form they retain the dual utility of being foodgrains as well as seeds. by process of coating and applying insecticides, other chemicals and poisonous substances to the foodgrain meant to be utlised as seeds, one of its basic character, i.e. its consumption as food by ..... and contended that the process is not identical to the case of navbharat seeds (p) ltd., and therefore, assessee is not entitled to deduction under sec. 80ia of the it act. mr. mehta further contended that at least 10 employees are there, and therefore, even if it is a manufacturing process, they are not entitled to .....

Rameshchandra Shamjibhai Raniga Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2000)4GLR1

..... are made available to the poor and needy.34. the second limb of the argument advanced on behalf of the petitioners is that by provisions of section 2 of repealing act of 1999, the act of 1976 having been totally repealed, the alleged excess vacant land taken possession of from the land owners and in which use has not commenced cannot ..... and are entitled to public assistance. the repeal will not, however affect land on which building activity has already commenced. for that limited purpose, exemptions granted under section 20 of the act will continue to be operative. amounts paid out by the state government will become refundable.5. the bill seeks to achieve the above purpose.new delhithe 4th june, ..... 675(4) kandige sham bhat and ors. v. the agricultural income tax officer air 1963 sc 591(5) udairam shah and ors. v. union of india and ors. air 1968 sc 1138(6) shashikant laxman kale and another v. union of india air 1990 sc 2114(7) m/s. larsen and toubro ltd. etc. state of gujarat and others. .....