Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: gujarat Page 4 of about 108 results (0.287 seconds)

Abhay Harinandan Oza Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : II(2008)DMC744; (2008)2GLR1178

..... -ketna committed suicide on 25th june, 2001 at about 11-15 p.m. at her matrimonial house situated at dharampur road, valsad, by consuming baygon spray, an insecticide being used for domestic purpose. it is in evidence that on that very day the victim-ketna was to proceed with her husband and minor child to bhavnagar and ..... about by persuasion to do any thing. the abetment may be by instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, as provided in the three clauses of section 107. section 109 provides that if the act abetted is committed in consequence of abetment and there is no provision for the punishment of such abetment, then the offender is to be punished ..... to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical); and by doing so, you the accused have committed an offence punishable under sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act as well as section 498a of the indian penal code.further, because of the physical and mental harassment/cruelty being meted out to the deceased-ketnaben she .....

State of Gujarat Vs. Patel Maheshbhai Ranchodbhai and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2566

..... dying declaration and supporting evidence, death of the deceased, admittedly was suicidal death and this is a fit case therefore to invoke presumption under section 113-a of the indian evidence act, 1872. the accused have failed to discharge the burden upon them to explain the death of the deceased. on the contrary, they admitted ..... cruelty, which we have discussed earlier. now the question is how to evaluate these circumstances. therefore, the legislature in its wisdom has enacted section 113-a of the indian evidence act, 1872 which mandates the court that the court may presume having regard to all the other circumstances of the case that the suicide taken ..... question and answer form, such dying declaration was vulnerable.25. it is relevant to notice here the law as to appreciating the dying declaration. section 32(1) of the indian evidence act, 1872 is an exception to the general rule that hearsay evidence is not admissible evidence and unless evidence is tested by cross-examination, it .....

Shantilal Manibhai Patel and ors. Vs. Laxmi Film Laboratory and Studio ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1984]56CompCas110(Guj); (1982)2GLR363

..... to te patel group of shareholders, should be granted in the facts and circumstances of te case. that attracts the application of the provisions of ss. 397, 398 of the act. section 397 reads as under : '397. (1) any members of a company who complain that the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to public interest ..... a fraudulent preference; (g) any other matter for which in the opinion of the court it is just and equitable that provision should be made. 25. section 433(f) of the act, which deals with the winding up of a company; provides that a company may be wound up by the court if the court is of the opinion that ..... to the concerned party; (f) the setting aside of any transfer, delivery, of goods, payment, execution or other act relating to property made or done by or against the company within three months before the date of the application under section 397/398, which would, if made or done by or against an individual, be deemed in his insolvency to be .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shilpa Jigishbhai @ Jignesh Vyas

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : III(2005)ACC343; IV(2005)ACC112; IV(2005)ACC485; 2005ACJ1645; (2005)2GLR1784

..... year old at that time. initially, deceased was working honorary in kishan multipurpose coop. society ltd. at dabhoi dealing in agricultural, vegetable produce, fertilizers, seeds, insecticides etc. and was supplying grams and fodder to the police department in the city of baroda (rural), districts of surat, bharuch, anand and idar etc. through ..... written statement nor appeared at any stage before the claims tribunal to contest the claim. the insurance co. did not seek permission under section 170 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 to contest the claim on all available grounds. however, it filed the written statement exh.14 and submitted that the claimants ..... raju and anr. (2000 acj 777). undisputedly, the insurance company has not sought permission under section 170 of the mv act, 1988 to contest the claim on all available grounds, therefore, such challenge without permission under section 170 of the mv act, 1988 is not permissible. in the present case, the appeal is filed by the insurance .....

Virabala and ors. Vs. Shah Harichand Ratanchand

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1973Guj1; (1973)0GLR88

..... mehsana, it is the district court at mehsana which will have jurisdiction to hear this application. even if we read clause (b) (ii) of sub-section (5) of section 4 of the act, the position is the same. it reads:--'where a guardian has been appointed or declared in pursuance of any such application in any matter relating to the person ..... 1963. the marriage between virbala and harichand had taken place on 18th february, 1961. sharmishta was born on the 28th february, 1966 and mahendra was born on 15th may, 1968. mahendra has never resided at his father's place. he has all along lived at village vaghel. even before virbala left her husband's home, even according to her ..... made to any one of the court referred to therein.18. another significant fact to be borne in mind is that in view of the aforesaid sub-section (2) of section 9 of the act, there was a possibility of several court having jurisdiction to entrain the application with respect to the guardianship of the property of the minor. it may .....

Faizubhai Mahmadbhai Vs. Balkrishna Naradlal Bhatt

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1972Guj9; (1972)0GLR137

..... repugnant to the subject or context which would justify us to restrict the meaning of the word 'landlord' given in the statute itself of section 5 (1) of the act.19. in civil revn, apln. no. 646 of 1968, d/-21-12-1970 (guj), by me as a single judge, there was an occasion to consider the question whether the word 'landlord' used ..... in section 12 of the bombay act could be given a meaning different from the meaning given in the definition clause, in the context of facts and circumstances whether the landlord ..... of the within 2 months of the institution of the suit, there would be no forfeiture of the tenancy has no force in view of the provisions of section 12 of the act. sub-section (2) permits the landlord to institute a suit for the eviction of tenant on the ground on non-payment of rent after the expiration of one month from .....

Saurashtra Khandsari Manufacturers Association and ors. Vs. Sales Tax ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1975)16GLR610

..... other petitioners are 24 in number. many of these petitioners are registered dealers and some are in process of obtaining registration under the act. under section 49(2) of the act, the state government is authorised by the legislature to issue notification in the official gazette giving exemption from sales tax to any specified class ..... in a village industry established by such board;or2. purchases by the khadi & village industries commission constituted under the khadi & village industries act, 1956, which under sub-section (2) of sec 18 is deemed to be a registered dealer, of sugarcane for use by such commission in the manufacture of khandsari in a village ..... through khadi and village industries has remained the same, as is clear from the following excerpts from 'khadi and village industries' committee report of february, 1968.'2.9 mahatma gandhi had emphasised that mere pursuit of the social objective of providing employment to the people or the economic objective of producing khadi for .....

Maniben Chhotubhai and ors. Vs. Kacharabhai Bhulabhi

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1974)15GLR209

..... object underlying this extension of the meaning given to the word 'tenant' and especially the object under lying the engrafting of this clause (e) of sub-section (11) of section 5 of the act.19. the question that is posed before us, is whether it could ever have been contemplated by the legislature to give benefit of the provisions of ..... the premises let for residence. he has, therefore, contended that in view of this definition of 'tenant' and particularly, in view of clause (c)(i) of section 5(11) of the act, the present petitioners would be the statutory tenants and that would be, independently of deceased chhotubhai. in short, his submission was that on the death of chhotubhai- ..... in year 1968. it means, that the judgment-debtor died prior to the date when he had to hand- bet possession of the suit property under the decree passed on the basic of the consent terms.15. mr. mehta has invited our attention to the definition of the word 'tenant' given in section 5(11) of the act, which reads .....

Tata Teleservices Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

..... of the financial year in which the statement is filed for the said years. 3.1 the respective petitioners have also prayed to declare that section 201 of the act as amended by finance act, 2014 (act no.2 of 2014) is prospective and does not apply to the proceedings where period of passing the order has expired before 1/10/2014. ..... 2014 is with prospective effect. on the aforesaid grounds and submissions, the respective petitioners have challenged the impugned notices / summonses issued under section 201 of the act. 8.that the amendment of section 201 of the act by finance act, 2014 was expressly made prospective w.e.f. 01/10/2014 and therefore the impugned notices/summons for fy 2007-2008 and 2008 ..... the judgment cited by respondent no. 2 i.e. (i) in the case of ahmedabad manufacturing and calico printing co. ltd. v. s. g. mehta ito, reported in [1968] 48 [tr 154 and (ii) in the case of addl. commissioner v. jyoti traders and aur. reported in 1999(2) scc 77 would not apply in the present case .....

Cit Vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)181CTR(Guj)134

..... it, the interest earned by the depositors was not chargeable under the indian income tax act and there was no obligation upon the assessee to deduct tax under section 18(3a). the assessee was, therefore, entitled to the deduction under section 10(2)(iii) of the act.(z) in cit v. cooper enginering ltd. : [1968]68itr457(bom) , the court, in context of the provisions of ..... sections 4(1) and 18(3b) of the indian income tax act, 1922, held that unless any payment of interest .....