Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: chennai Page 5 of about 158 results (0.051 seconds)

In Re: Lakshminarayana Aiyar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1918Mad738; 42Ind.Cas.989

..... that the public servant who takes the bribe has not the least intention of doing and yet the offence will be complete. also the motive or reward mentioned in the section is the consideration for showing favour, which is not necessarily identical with the motive or intention of the giver of the illegal gratification. the offence of abetment is committed by ..... , or if there was, it is possible that be might escape by invoking the aid to of section 79 or section 81 of the indian penal code and pleading that he acted in good faith and believed himself to be justified by law in his act, or that he did it in good faith for the purpose of avoiding more harm to other persons ..... has now been referred to me, it is argued that it is open to me to find that the accused's act did not in law constitute an offence at all, and that i should acquit him.14. an offence under section 161 of the indian penal code is committed when a public servant accepts any gratification, other than legal remuneration, as .....

Tamilarasan Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Villupuram

Court : Chennai

..... counsel for the appellant would submit that there is no evidence to prove as to what was allegedly given by the accused to all the 3 children was 'indoxacarb insecticide''. the learned counsel for the appellant would further submit that the evidence of the child p.w.5 cannot be believed, as she has spoken as tutored. ..... material objects also to court. then, he made a requisition to the court to forward the m.o.1 for chemical analysis. the report revealed that there was 'indoxacarb insecticide'' in the same. on completing the investigation, he laid charge sheet against the accused.3. based on the above materials, the trial court framed charges as detailed in ..... poison to the children was only to cause their death. fortunately, they survived. thus, the act of the accused would squarely fall within the ambit of section 307 of ipc. thus, the trial court was right in convicting the accused for the offences under sections 302 and 307 (2 counts) of ipc. 18. now coming to the quantum of punishment, .....

Balaji Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police.

Court : Chennai

..... happily and with their consent alone she conducted operation.11. p.w.14 dr. ramani devi who would say in her certificate ex.p.4 that p.w.1 consumed insecticide and she treated her on 21.5.2003. she further stated that in 2000 september there was second conception and p.w.1 was advised to continue the pregnancy, that ..... and rent from 5.1.2002. thereafter, both of them went to gujarat. after returning to trichy, first accused with his parents harassed her, demanding dowry and hence she consumed insecticide. her father took her to the doctor. since the fact of his non completion of b.sc degree was known to her parents a1 got irritated and demanded further dowry ..... .[e] on receipt of the complaint, p.w.16 women inspector of police, registered a case in cr.no.92 of 2003 under sections 498(a), 313, 292, 377 and 306 i.p.c and section 4 of dowry prohibition act. she lodged fir ex.p.5. she searched the accused and arrested on 28.3.2003 at 6.00 p.m. in .....

Arokiasamy Vs. State Represented by

Court : Chennai

..... dhanushkodi [p.w.8].on enquiries made with the parents of sheeba, it came to the knowledge of dr.dhanushkodi [p.w.8].that all the three had consumed insecticide and therefore, he gave them immediate firs.aid and directed them to a bigger hospital for better treatment. the parents of sheeba refused to follow the advice of p ..... to the prosecution that the suicide note was in fact written by josephine, let us analyse if that would incriminate the accused. a suicide note is relevant under section 32(1) of the evidence act, when the cause of death is in question. in pakala narayana swami versus emperor (air1939pc47 the privy council has enlarged the scope of ..... there is absolutely no evidence to show as to how she acquired the said insecticide. neither the container was recovered nor the police were able to show the source from where this insecticide was got. it is not the police case that the accused has purchased insecticide and kept it in his house. admittedly, the accused was not in the house .....

Asstt. Collr., Spl. Invgn. Bureau Vs. Mysore Insecticides Co. P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(108)ELT617(Mad)

..... follows :-(a) the first respondent (al) is the company. the second and third respondents are the managing directors of the above company. the company was engaged in manufacturing of the insecticidal formulations. the company had a private bonded warehouse in the company's factory premises itself licensed by the customs department. the company imported chemicals and kept the same in the ..... in this case, since the goods improperly removed from the bonded warehouse were not available.15. on the other hand, the adjudicating authority has properly exercised its power under section 124 of the act by issuing show cause notice before imposing the penalty, as indicated earlier. the respondents admitted their liability in the earlier statements made before the authority. under those circumstances .....

Thangavel Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Magudanchavadi Po ...

Court : Chennai

..... , informed the doctor that the deceased had consumed poison. p.w.6-dr.arunachalam has deposed that the accused was treated for having consumed organophosphorus which is an insecticide. the evidence of the doctor is duly corroborated by the poison in the container which was recovered from the place of occurrence and subjected to chemical examination. the ..... it is immaterial. thus, we find that the prosecution has clearly proved that the accused had made an attempt to commit suicide thereby committed an offence punishable under section 309 of ipc. 23. p.w.1 had gone to the police station after seeing the deceased dead and made the complaint upon which the present case was ..... the confession itself. though the said extra judicial confession is a weak piece of evidence by its very nature, it is not as if the trial court has acted upon the said confession alone to convict the accused. it is only a piece of evidence available in favour of the prosecution. according to the said confession, the .....

Dr. P. Sivanesan Vs. the Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2006)2MLJ775

..... of the corporation officers in other area at the relevant time. (c) petitioner further states that after enquiry, he unearthed the scandal of malarial insecticide purchase and usage and framed charges against one chandrasekar, field assistant. aggrieved against that, the said chandrasekar motivated the malaria workers against the petitioner and ..... post. the learned counsel also produced the regulation, which is extracted hereunder,minimum qualifications for teachers in medical institutions regulations, 1998.(published in part iii, section 4 of the gazette of india dated 5th december, 1998)1. short title and commencement:(1) these regulation may be called the 'minimum qualification ..... lodged a false complaint under pcr act on 16.12.2005, however, the said case was withdrawn on 17.12.2005. petitioner gave a police complaint against the said chandrasekar on .....

Veeralakshmi Vs. Kannapiran and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... government medical college hospital, tuticorin, examined p.w.2 and issued ex.p6 accident register. he has stated that the patient is alleged to have consumed poison (organo phosphorus insecticide) at about 09.00 p.m. on 11.09.2006. on completion of the investigation, p.w.9 further examined the doctor and other police personnel and laid charge ..... for the misbehaviour of the accused towards her and she also wept, that at about 9.00 p.m. on that day, p.w.2 consumed nurelle d 505 insecticide, that on hearing the distressing voice, p.w.5 and other neighbours rushed to the place and they administered soap solution and tamarind solution into the mouth of p. ..... framed charges also has miserably failed to go through the materials in the prosecution case in a proper manner and wrongly framed charge under this section. on this account, the charge under section 4a of the act has no legs to stand. 5. mr.s.durairaj, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner would contend that there is no motive for .....

V.Ponnambalam Vs. Prl Secy to Government

Court : Chennai

..... the illicit distiller malaikannu. hence she was allowed to go home and she was never detained at the police station for any other cause. after she returned home she consumed insecticide and despite the treatment in a private hospital, she died of poisoning at about 3.45 p.m." 6. thus, it is evident that the said irulayee was unnecessarily taken ..... in the high court of judicature at madras dated :1. 3.2013 coram: the honourable mr.r.k.agrawal, acting chief justice and the honourable mr.justice n. paul vasanthakumar writ petition no.5022 of 2013 and m.p.nos.1 and 2 of 2013 v.ponnambalam ... petitioner vs 1 ..... 1. the principal secretary to government home department, fort st. george chennai-600 009.2. the registrar, state human right commission greenways road, chennai-600 028. the hon'ble the acting chief justice and n. paul vasanthakumar, j.kb w.p.no.5022 o 1. 3.2013 .....

M.C.Jayasingh Vs. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited

Court : Chennai

..... specifications; and (iii) claims with reference to certain parameters including anticipation. the expressions ".teachings"., ".claims". and ".specifications". are not defined in the act. but, under section 7(4) of the act, every application for the grant of a patent should be accompanied by a provisional or a complete specification. the procedure for filing such specifications is prescribed ..... respect of finger operated sprayers with a ".hold-down". cap of the type commonly seen on grocers' shelves inserted in bottles of insecticides and other liquids prior to shipment. these cases were the first of their kind that came up before the supreme court after the advent of the ..... is as follows: (a) that he founded a proprietary concern, originally known as eagle engineering works and now known as eagle osteon technologies, in the year 1968, in the field of precision engineering; (b) that by tireless efforts and investment for over two decades, the plaintiff invented a wide range of prosthesis for .....