Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 10 appeal against non registration or cancellation Page 8 of about 2,478 results (0.451 seconds)

Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. and anr. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002(64)DRJ411

..... ) of clause (k) of section 3 of the insecticides act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') read with rule 27 of the rules framed under the act, for manufacturing, selling and distributing misbranded insecticides/mats. the complaint was also filed against the retailer as well as ..... . 1 is a company holding license under the insecticide act, 1971 for storage and sale of insecticides and petitioner no. 2 is the director of petitioner no. 1 company. they filed the writ petition for quashing of complaint no. 136/97, instituted against them by the plant protection officer/licensing officer, respondent no. 2, under section 29(1)(a) read with sub-clause (i .....

D.K. Jhaver Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1996]87CompCas236(P& H)

..... the proceedings against them were rightly quashed.'10. in the case in hand also, no allegation has been made in the complaint in terms of section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968, qua the petitioner that the offence had been committed with his consent, or connivance, or was attributable to any neglect on the part of the ..... sc 67, in order to substantiate his argument.6. for facility of reference, however, the relevant portion of section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968, is reproduced hereunder :'33. offences by companies--(1) whenever an offence under this act has been committed by a company, every person who at the time the offence was committed was in charge ..... 227 of the constitution of india, for quashing complaint annexed as annexure p-1 with this petition, under sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968, read with rule 27(5) of the insecticides rules, 1971, and for quashing consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. briefly stated, the facts giving rise to .....

Tarsem Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)115PLR34

..... first point formulated by the court above, it is also necessary for me to make a comparative study about the other pieces of legislation of absolute liability, such as insecticides act, prevention of food adulteration act, drugs and cosmetics act. sub-section (4) of section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968 has given right to a person who has notified his intention of adducing evidence in controversion of the ..... accused. there was a purpose when the legislature in its wisdom had incorporated such provisions like sub-section (4) of section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968 and for the sake of convenience, i would like to reproduce the above provisions, i.e., sub-section (4) of section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968, which would help me in solving the present controversy:-'(4) unless the sample has already been .....

D. Rama Moorthy, Managing Director, S.S.D. Oil Mills Company Ltd. Chen ...

Court : Kerala

..... was under insecticides act 1968. shelf life of the sample of the insecticide seized had expired and for that reason no further steps could be taken for its examination. there, the supreme court quashed prosecution against accused. 13. in medicamen biotech limited and another v. rubina bose, drug inspector (2008(7) scc 196), prosecution was under drugs and cosmetics act 1940. in the above act, section 25 ..... haryana v. unique farmaid p. ltd (1999 (2) fac 399) the non-compliance of the statutory requirements under section 24 of the insecticides act, 1963 was the matter in issue. section 24 of the insecticides act is analogous to that of section 13(3) of the prevention of the food adulteration act. there, though the vendor exercised his right of option to get the sample tested by central .....

Pesticides Mfrs. and Formulators Ascn. of India Vs. Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000(115)ELT324(Del)

..... in the same category and should not be interpreted separately for the levy of excise duty etc.37. under section 3(e)(1) of the insecticides act the insecticides specified in the schedule are technical grade insecticides and any dilution also termed as formulation fall within the definition as the general property and toxity of both ..... parlance as also technical literature technical grade pesticides would be distinguishable from formulations or preparations;(ii) that the insecticides act and rules distinguish them and prescribe different types of packages;(iii) that the section 37b order dated 27-7-1995 would no longer be valid in its entirety because of the changes in ..... is an association of various manufacturers of 'technical grade pesticides and insecticides' and formulations thereof.3. the respondent no. 2, the central board of excise and customs has been given powers to issue orders under section 37 of the central excise act, 1944 for the purpose of uniformity of classifications. all such .....

Hindustan Palvarising Mills and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj423; 2002(3)WLC198; 2002(3)WLN681

..... the petitioners, who are manufacturers with the prayer that the proceedings of state v. kumawat krishi sewa kendra and ors., for the offence punishable under section 29(1)(a) of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1968') pending in the court of chief judicial magistrate, bhilwara be quashed.2. it arises in the following circumstances :-on 16.8.1996, a complaint ..... by the insecticide analyst, the dates of manufacture of the article and the expiry date are mentioned. it means the expiry date of sample is very much material in deciding such type of matters.11. section 30 of the act of 1968 provides for defences which may or may not be allowed in prosecution under the act of 1968. section 30(1) of the act of 1968 only prescribes .....

Artee Minerals and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002(3)WLN658; 2002(3)WLN658

..... complaint, which the prayer that the proceedings of criminal case no. 162/87 state v. thakar das rajendra kumar and ors. for the offence under section 2, 18/29 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1968') pending in the court of judicial magistrate, first class, anoopgarh (sri ganganagar) be quashed.2. it arises in the following circumstances;-on 18.4 ..... by the insecticide analyst, the dates of manufacture of the article and the expiry date are mentioned. it means the expiry date of sample is very much material in deciding such type of matters.11. section 30 of the act of 1968 provides for defences which may or may not be allowed in prosecution under the act of 1968. section 30(1) of the act of 1968 only prescribes .....

Swastik Pesticides and Chemicals thro' Vijaykumar Vs. the State of Guj ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2027

..... cited decision (re.paras:3, 4 and 5) :'3. despite the request having been made by the petitioner as envisaged under section 24(3) of the insecticides act, 1968 (herinafter referred to as 'the act'). admittedly, no sample was sent to the central insecticide laboratory but the complaint was filed on 18.4.1996. admittedly, the shelf life of the product was to expire in september ..... judicial magistrate, surendranagar, has prayed for quashing of criminal complaint as well as prosecution instituted thereon in reference to the provisions of section 3(k)(1), 17(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) of the insecticide act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').2. the petitioner-orig.accused no. 2 (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused-company') is a registered company under the companies .....

Deshmukha Enterprises and ors. Vs. Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2327; 1997(4)KarLJ286

..... contravening sub clause 1 & viii of clause (k) of section 3 of the act, therefore, after obtaining necessary sanction, he ..... and sold the 'misbranded' insecticide. as such accused nos. 1 to 3 have committed offence by contravening sub-clause (i) & viii of cause (k) of section 3 of insecticide act, 1968, punishable under section 29(1)(a) of the insecticide act, 1968, (for short 'the act'). similarly, accused no. 4 also committed the offence under section 29(1)(a) by ..... middle portion of the container. he also failed to furnish the sample for retesting to the central insecticide laboratory inspite of the demand as provided under sub-sections 3 & 4 of section 24 of the act. the sanction granted for prosecution by the director is vitiated and the investigation is not honest. .....

B.L. Agrawal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR813]; RLW2003(3)Raj1565; 2002(4)WLN154

..... that the proceedings of criminal case no. 77a/91 state v. merta krishak kraya vikrya sahakari samiti, merta city and ors. for the offence under section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 (herein-after referred to as 'the act of 1968') pending in the court of judicial magistrate first class, merta city be quashed.2. it arises on the following circumstances:-on 5.7.1991, a ..... the complainant or the accused, as the court shall direct.'8. section 21 of the act of 1968 empowers the insecticide inspector to take samples of any insecticide and send such samples for analysis to the insecticide analyst for test in the prescribed manner and as per sub-section (5) of section 22-of the act of 1968, he shall divide the sample into three portions and effectively seal and .....