Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1978)19GLR671
..... that the managing committee included the principal and representatives of the teachers who both can safely be styled as insiders and there was no outsider, under section 33-a of the act, it is obligatory to appoint a representative of the vice chancellor both on the governing body as well as on the staff selection committee. in ..... a common master should have preference over those who has shorter service. it is here that the principle enunciated in sant ram v. state of rajasthan : (1968)iillj830sc would assist us in holding that principle of continuous officiation is valid rule of seniority even in the context of article 16. possibly this approach stems from ..... within the meaning of article 12. but urged mr. nanavati that it has been clearly ruled by the supreme court in rajasthan electricity board v. mohanlal : (1968)illj257sc that state as defined in article 12, is comprehended to include bodies created for the purpose of promoting the educational and economic interests of the people. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1992)2GLR1273
..... breach of undertaking given to the court. we, therefore, convict the respondents nos. 1 and 2 of the offence of civil contempt of court punishable under section 12 of the contempt of courts act and sentence the respondent no. 1 to pay a fine of rs. 2000/- and as far as the respondent no. 2 is concerned we sentence him ..... have given an undertaking to the court and have committed wilful breach of such undertaking and thereby committed contempt of the court as defined in section 2(b) of the contempt of courts act and we are also satisfied that this contempt is of such a nature that it substantially interfere with the due course of administration of justice ..... but has wilfully or contumaciously refused to pay the same. in that case, there was an undertaking to the court to deposit rs. 4250/- on or before july 10, 1968. as the amount was not so deposited, an application was made to the court of magistrate that breach of such undertaking was committed. in the written statement before the learned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1995)2GLR1733
..... citizens of india.9. for acquisition of land for companies, special provisions have been made in the land acquisition act contained in part vii of the said act. it contains section 38a to section 44b. section 39, after its amendment by act 68 of 1984, requires previous consent of the government and the execution of the agreement, before the provisions of ..... government has consulted the committee and has considered the report submitted under this rule and the report, if any, submitted under section 5-a of the act; and(ii) the agreement under section 41 of the act has been executed by the company.11. it has been contended by shri desai, learned counsel for the petitioners that the provisions ..... be of any assistance to the company. in the first case, the delay was of 4 years after issuance of section 6 notification. in the second case, the notification under section 6 was issued in the year 1968-69 but the writ petition was filed in the year 1977. in the delhi case, there was delay of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1981)22GLR712
..... commission regarding the procedure etc. of the proceedings before it and these were framed in april 1980.15. before dealing with all these legal positions, section 7 of the act is the most material section and it provides in clause (a).the appropriate government may, by notification in the official gazette, declare that-(a) a commission (other then ..... light of the decisions of the supreme court in century spinning & v. the ulhasnagar municipal council : [1970]3scr854 , union of india v. indo afghan agencies a.i.r. 1968 s.c. 718 and turner morrison and co. ltd v. hungerford investment trust ltd. : [1972]85itr607(sc) , that the government was estopped by way o promissory estoppel ..... by the time of supreme court decided rohtas industries case (supra), the house of lords had delivered its decision in padfield v. minister of agriculture, fisheries and food 1968 a.c. 997. hegde, j. in his judgment in paragraphs 30 to 35 extensively from the speeches of some of the law lords in padfield's case ( .....
Tag this Judgment!