Skip to content


Inland Vessels Amendment Act 2007 Section 8 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: inland vessels amendment act 2007 section 8 Page 1 of about 410 results (4.927 seconds)
Jul 06 1976 (FN)

United States Vs. Martinez-fuerte

Court : US Supreme Court

u s 879 the border patrol conducts three kinds of inland traffic checking operations in an effort to minimize illegal immigration by undetected as every motorist is questioned iii the fourth amendment imposes limits on search and seizure powers in order to fortiori discretion can be no more limited simply because the activity is detention or questioning rather than searching footnote 2 6 recent decisions in united states v ortiz 422 u s 891 1975 united states v brignoni ponce 422 u s 873

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 2012 (HC)

M/S. Jaiprakash Associates Limited and Another Vs. State of Himachal P ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

is on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways that taxes can be imposed the expression carried by levied prior to january 1 1984 i e before the amendment of section 4 by act 24 of 1984 was a the 8216 act 1999 8217 is not challenged but 8216 act 1999 8217 would not apply to a new industrial unit or on inland waterways 8221 in sainik motors case supra section 3 provided 8220 there shall be levied charged and paid is admittedly manufacturing the goods in the tax tree zone 8221 19 admittedly 8216 act 1999 8217 has been enacted under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 12 1916 (FN)

Spokane and Inland Empire R. Co. Vs. Campbell

Court : US Supreme Court

r co v campbell 241 u s 497 1916 spokane inland empire railroad company v campbell no 325 argued april 26 the concluding cause of the first section of the 1903 amendment 32 stat 943 which excepts trains cars etc which are in any case where a violation of the safety appliance act contributed to the injury or death of such employee it brakemen to use the common hand brake for that purpose section 6 prescribing penalties also uses the words locomotive engine and wash 632 637 crowley v nor pac ry 46 wash 85 87 88 sudden christenson v morse 55 wash 372 375

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 27 2022 (SC)

All Kerala Distributors Association, Represented By Its Secretary Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

taxes on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways and entry 57 taxes on vehicles whether mechanically propelled sense the only challenge in these appeals is that the amendment makes payment of the welfare dues a precondition for the vehicle without a permit and section 17719 of the 1988 act is a general provision for punishment owing to contravention of 14 para8 33 2004 4 scc489 paras 13 and15 34 2007 9 scc109 para12 26 reliance has been placed on the to pay the said tax 2 nothing contained in sub section 1 shall be deemed to affect the liability to pay a permit other than a temporary permit issued under section 87 or a special permit issued under sub section 8 of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 1991 (HC)

inder Kumar Goyal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1992Raj181; 1991(2)WLC196

taxes on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways entry i of list iii criminal law including all will be referred to as 1951 act as amended by amendment act no 5 of 1989 the transport checking party demanded section 17 for other contraventions of the provisions of the act and the rules also punishment is provided by section 11 court had also held that the term tax used in section 21 of 1951 act has to be read in broader or repungancy between the central law and the state law 8 a rejoinder has been filed by the petitioner in this

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 12 1974 (SC)

G.K. Krishnan and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC583; (1975)1SCC375; [1975]2SCR715

taxes on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways would be a restriction which is immediate and direct the rates as amended by the madras motor vehicles taxation amendment act 1967 shall not have retrospective effect from a date the context of economic interests we find that discriminatory state action is almost always sustained for such interests are generally far of the area for which the permit is required see section 49 and the regional transport authority may attach a condition the decision in atiabari case 1961 5 s c r 809 insofar as it held that if a state legislature wanted

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2002 (HC)

Larsen and Toubro Ltd., Bombay and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR111; (2002)3BOMLR539; 2002(2)MhLj857

tax on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways 57 tax on vehicles whether mechanically propelled or not the bombay vehicles taxation of passengers act 1958 by the amendment of 1989 it was intended to impose one levy at the levy of tax under the bombay motor vehicles tax act 1958 the division bench of this court passed an order and ors the question before the apex court was whether section 3 3 of the haryana passengers and goods taxation act 510 0002 455 079 0001991 922 335 480 0003 627 878 0001992 932 359 899 0004 418 634 0001999 20007 129

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 1985 (HC)

Indian Telephone Industries Limited, Bangalore and Etc. Etc. Vs. State ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1985Kant186; 1985(1)KarLJ407

taxes on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways 57 taxes on vehicles whether mechanically propelled or not payment of taxes under the act the effect of this amendment was that from 1 7 1976 the classification of the relevant provisions of the said act as amended by this act and accordingly a no suit or other proceedings shall be the court should examine in examining the validation act 38 section 1 2 gives retrospective effect to the act from 1 cases we will refer to them at the appropriate stages 8 in writ petitions nos 12794 12797 of 1978 and 39853

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 1985 (HC)

iti, Hmt, Hal, Bel and Bgml Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR1129

taxes on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways 57 taxes on vehicles whether mechanically propelled or not vehicles taxation ace was amended by the karnatakamotor vehicles taxation amendment act 1972 karnataka act no 100 per seat per quarter 1976 act introducing a note to section 3 of the act which is the charging section from the very inception of an end on the expiry of the prescribed period under section 25 of the motor vehicles act it ceases to be the constitution 44thamendment act that came into force on 1 8 1979 with the deletion of those articles these petitioners even

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 1997 (HC)

R. Gandhi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the Ministry of La ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC255

of the assam taxation on goods carried by roads and inland waterways act 1954 by applying the provisions of this part better understanding and easy comparison prior to 1991 amendmentafter 1991 amendmentafter ordinance no 1 of 1997section 3section 3section 3levy of tax orderjanarthanam j 1 all these actions this batch of writ petitions filed by importers dealers or penalty namely rs which is due from you as per section 3 1 of tamil nadu entry of motor vehicles into prayed for oral leave to appeal to the supreme court 81 we are not inclined to grant the leave so prayed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //