Skip to content


Initial - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: initial Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.06 seconds)
Jun 06 2011 (FN)

Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. Vs. Siracusano

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-06-2011

..... adverse events respondents plaintiffs in a securities fraud class action allege that petitioners matrixx initiatives inc and three of its executives collectively matrixx failed to disclose reports of ..... that zicam cold remedy accounted for approximately 70 percent of matrixx s sales respondents initiated this securities fraud class action against matrixx on behalf of individuals who purchased matrixx .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 2011 (TRI)

Smt. K.U. Sobhana and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by the Sec ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Aug-12-2011

..... admittedly others similarly situated have all been granted regularization from the date of their initial engagement as daily rated ldcs and the consequential benefit including seniority granted fixation of ..... but they having continued in the establishment as casual employees from their date of initial appointment though not regular was extended the benefit of regularization and other benefits other .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 18 2011 (HC)

Ms Nutech Pakcaging Limited and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-18-2011

..... recovery against the guarantor in view of the uniquebutyle case recovery proceedings can neither be initiated against the principal borrower nor against the guarantor under the 1972 act if the debt ..... raised by learned counsel for the petitioners can be accepted the recovery proceedings which were initiated by recovery certificate dated 26th march 2002 against guarantors only are not barred and there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 08 2011 (HC)

In Re., M.V. Jayarajan

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-08-2011

..... before the court it is also pertinent to note that the respondent had challenged the suo motu proceedings initiated against him by filing s l p crl no 4877 2011 before the hon 8217 ..... delete any direction that would be exercising review jurisdiction while dealing with an application for initiation of contempt proceedings the same would be impermissible and indefensible state of bihar v rajendra .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 2011 (HC)

In Re M.V. Jayarajan

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-08-2011

..... before the court it is also pertinent to note that the respondent had challenged the suo motu proceedings initiated against him by filing slp crl no 4877 2011 before the hon ble supreme court ..... any direction that would be exercising review jurisdiction while dealing with an application for initiation of contempt proceedings the same would be impermissible and indefensible state of bihar v rajendra .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2011 (TRI)

Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Co. Ltd, Chhattisgarh and Another Vs. ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: Mar-15-2011

..... breakdown and unscheduled outage to start up generator start up power is not contemplated for initial starting of generators and running the auxiliaries for their commissioning nowhere in its application for ..... start up power tariff iv utilisation of start up power for running plant auxiliaries for initial commissioning of the unit tentamounts to 8220 unauthorized use 8221 within the meaning of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 2011 (HC)

A. Jayaram, Bangalore and Others Vs. the Principal Secretary to the Go ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-05-2011

..... in nature government of karnataka had issued communication dated 28 12 1982 according sanction for initiating land acquisition proceedings to an extent of 66 5 acres only however the acquisition ..... government on the said representations they have also stated that there is no delay in initiating the proceedings before this court since the respondent authorities have committed fraud therefore there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 2011 (SC)

Shri Girish Vyas and anr. Vs. the State of Maharastra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

..... which has been constructed in the meanwhile the state government has been directed to initiate criminal investigation against shri manohar joshi shri ravindra murlidhar mane the then minister of ..... state and municipal commissioner the impugned judgment has directed the state of maharashtra to initiate appropriate investigation against them through an impartial agency and if satisfied that any criminal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 10 2011 (SC)

State of Jharkhand and ors.Etc. Vs Ms Shivam Coke Industries, Dhanbad, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-10-2011

..... revisional authority indefinitely in our considered opinion such extra ordinary power i e suo motu power of initiation of revisional proceeding has to be exercised within a reasonable period of time and what ..... question that arises for our consideration is whether the power to exercise suo motu revisional jurisdiction by the joint commissioner in the present cases was exercised within a reasonable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 2011 (HC)

Susi Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-21-2011

Reported in: ILR2011(1)Ker773

..... is required is not a subjective but an objective satisfaction 8 having entertained the initial threshold objective satisfaction the detaining authority must further consider whether the known goonda or ..... p c is totally different the learned govt pleader in these circumstances contends that initiation pendency disposal or actual detention for failure to furnish security in security proceedings under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //