Ingenious - Judgment Search Results

Gnanambal Vs. G.R. Selvaraj

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1970)2MLJ429

orderk s palaniswamy j 1 this is an appeal filed by the wife from the decision of he additional judge...

Bishunath Rai Vs. Sarju Rai and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1931All745

sulaiman ag c j 1 this is an objector s appeal from an order granting probate but not annexing to...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Tableware Craft Cottage

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1991]188ITR350(All)

b p jeevan reddy c j 1 under section 256 2 of the income tax act 1961 the tribunal has...

Ram Dihal Dubey Vs. Gajraj Updahya and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1935All499; 157Ind.Cas.665

sulaiman c j 1 this is a plaintiff s appeal arising out of a suit for a declaration that an...

Narendra Singh @ Narendra Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

sachchidanand jha j 1 there are in all four appellants in this batch of appeals they have been convicted under...

Geeta Pumps Pvt. Ltd. Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1999All32

orderd k seth j 1 this writ petition has been filed by m s geeta pumps provate limited for quashing...

Gadde Sitayya and anr. Vs. Gadde Kotayya and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1932Mad71

curgenven j 1 these four appeals are from decrees passed by the subordinate judge of kistna in four connected suits...

C. Abdul Basith Sahib Vs. Shanmughasundaram and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1956)1MLJ513

ramaswami j 1 this second appeal is preferred against the decree and judgment of the learned subordinate judge of vellore...

Nageswara Ayyar Vs. M.L.M. Ramanathan Chettiar and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1935Mad468; 157Ind.Cas.232

varadachariar j 1 this is an appeal by the mortgagor against a decree for sale passed in the mortgagee s...

Union of India and Ors vs.shiv Raj Singh Meena

Court: Delhi

..... not produce any evidence as to how the co allegedly us3ed ingenious method to print the ticket no 14538373 wrongly by keeping the ..... contention of the co that prosecution witness failed to prove what ingenious method was adopted by him is fully acceptable if skills of ..... of the respondent that the prosecution witness failed to prove any ingenious method adopted by him and moreover there was no evidence to .....