Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945
ORDERK.T. Sankaran, J.1. This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed by Dr. K.A. Koshy and Dr. Serena, who are two accused persons among the accused in Crime No. 30 of 2010 of Rajpura City Police Station, Patjala District, Punjab.2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Crime No. 30 of 2010, where the offences alleged, going by Annexure A First Information Report, are under Sections 65 and 66(1) and (2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. After hearing all the counsel and the learned Additional Advocate General of the State of Punjab, it is fairly clear that the offences alleged against the accused include the offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code as well.3. In the Bail Application, the offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code were not mentioned. When the Bail Application came up for admission, the undertaking made by the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for respondents 1 and 3 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : (1996)55TTJ(Del)532
ORDERB. M. KOTHARI, A. M. :The assessed has raised following grounds in this appeal :'1. That the CIT(A) has wrongly upheld that the appellants claim for interest under s. 214(2) was not covered by provisions of s. 154.2. That the CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that in view of the direct authority of Honble High Court reported as Deep Chand Jain vs . ITO , there was no question of there being two opinions on the subject.3. That the CIT(A) has further erred in holding that appellant was not entitled to interest under s. 244(1A) of Rs. 31,302 by misinterpreting the provisions.4. That the order of the Asstt. CIT and CIT(A) are against law and facts of the case.'2. The brief facts relating to the aforesaid appeal are as under. The appellant-company filed its return of income on 11th Nov., 1980, declaring taxable income of Rs. 11,36,270. The appellant had paid advance tax of Rs. 7,09,500 in one Installment on 21st Dec., 1979. The accounting year ended on 30th June, 1979. The original asses...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC716IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2161-2162 OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NOS. 3665-3666 OF2024 JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE & ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. HARISH & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ................................................................................ 4 B. IMPUGNED ORDER .............................................................................. 10 C. SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES ...................................................... 16 i. Submissions on behalf of the Appellants. .................................................... 16 ii. Submissions on behalf of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR). .......................................................................................... 18 iii. Submissions...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC451REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.29 OF2021SHAJI POULOSE .. PETITIONER VERSUS INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.267 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.272 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.371 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.581 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.670 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1084 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1200 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1256 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1291 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1295 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1360 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2022T.C. (Civil) No.29 of 2021 Etc. 1 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.186 OF2022WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.833 OF2022TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.27 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.28 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.30 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.31 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.33 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : [2008]303ITR86(Delhi)
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. These revision petitions are taken up together as they arise from the same proceedings. Out of the petitioners, only Mr. Neeraj Jain is not a director in the company known as Dr. Morepen Ltd. The petitioners are aggrieved by the summoning order dt. 30th March, 2005, passed by the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi, after cognizance has been taken of the offence punishable under Section 276B r/w Section 279 of the IT Act, 1961 in respect of the financial years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05.2. The short point raised by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners is that Section 276B is the punishing section for, inter alia, default in depositing the tax deducted at source under various provisions contained in Chapter XVII-B of the IT Act. Essentially, when a 'person' fails to pay to the credit of the Central Government, the tax deducted at source by him then he is, by virtue of Section 276B, punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term wh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1997)143CTR(Raj)252
ORDERM. G. MUKHERJI, C.J. :This writ application has been filed by Mahaveer Enterprises, Pindwara, District Sirohi, impugning certain assessment orders whereby the taxing authority levied tax on the writ petitioner as regards the sale of agricultural lands by the writ petitioner. There was a further prayer for quashing of the impugned penalty orders and a further prayer directing the respondents to refund the entire amount of tax, interest and penalty recovered from the petitioner on this account with interest. A general prayer was made so as to hold that the sale of agricultural lands does not give rise to any taxable income under the IT Act irrespective of the fact of the location of the agricultural lands within or outside the municipal limits. There was a challenge to the vires to the Explanation inserted in s. 2(1A) of the IT Act incorporated by the Finance Act, 1989, with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1970, contending inter alia that the same was illegal and unconstitution...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
1. The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order impugned dated 14.01.2011 passed by the Sessions Judge, Hazaribag in Criminal Appeal No.164 of 2010 by which the prayer for bail made by the petitioner-juvenile was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board, Hazaribag on 09.12.2010 was affirmed in Rajrappa P.S. Case No. 70 of 2010, corresponding to G.R.No. 2980 of 2010 and the appeal was dismissed. The petitioner was arrested but he was declared juvenile after determination of his age by the Juvenile Justice Board on 18.12.2010. The F.I.R. was lodged against as many as 11 named accused persons including the petitioner-juvenile for the alleged offence under Sections 376/354/306/509/511 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code as also under Sections 66A/66B/67A/67B and 72 of the the Information and Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. Learned Counsel Mr. Nilesh Kumar submitted that ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.494 OF2012JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) WITH TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.151 OF2013TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.152 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.833 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.829 OF2013TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.1797 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.932 OF2013TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.1796 OF2013CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.144 OF2014WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.494 OF2012IN TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.313 OF2014TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.312 OF2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.2524 OF2014WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.37 OF2015Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 1 of 567 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.220 OF2015CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.674 OF2015WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.829 OF2013TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.921 OF2015CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.470 OF2015WRIT...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2016 Pronounced on:23. 12.2016 FAO(OS) 540/2011, C.M. APPL.20174/2011, 13919 & 17996/2015 MYSPACE INC. ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Rajendra Kumar, Sh. Prashant Gupta and Sh. Kanishk Kumar, Advocate. Versus SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Neel Mason, Sh. Ankit Relan, Sh. Harsh Kaushik, Sh. Vinay. P. Tripathi, Ms Ridhima Pabbi, Ms. Rashi Punia and Sh. Sameer Rohatgi, Advocates. Ms. Shwetasree Majumdar and Ms. Tanya Verma, Advocates, for intervener. Ms. Kanika Jain, Advocate, for Intervener/Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. is a defendants This interlocutory appeal in C.S(OS) 2682/2008 (the suit)wherein the order, on application by the plaintiff(Super Cassettes or SCIL)for interim injunction was granted and the appellant (MySpace) was restrained from hosting o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4676 OF2020AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4712 OF2020IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4676 OF2020BETWEEN:1. SRI. KUNAL BAHL CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF M/S JASPER INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, 238 1ST FLOOR, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110020 2. SRI. ROHIT KUMAR BANSAL CHIEF OPERATIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF M/S JASPER INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED238 1ST FLOOR, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110020 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.C.V. NAGESH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SANJANTHI SAJAN POOVAYYA, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY DRUGS INSPECTOR (INTELLIGENCE)-2 REGIONAL OFFICE, MYSORE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DRUGS CONTROLLER-CA-08 2ND PHASE, 4TH STAGE VIJAYANAGAR, MYSURU-570032 ... RESPONDENT (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, HCGP) Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 2 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 THIS CRIMI...
Tag this Judgment!