Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: information technology amendment act 2008 section 21 amendment of section 43 Page 1 of about 4,295 results (0.150 seconds)

Mar 01 2010 (HC)

Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945

ORDERK.T. Sankaran, J.1. This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed by Dr. K.A. Koshy and Dr. Serena, who are two accused persons among the accused in Crime No. 30 of 2010 of Rajpura City Police Station, Patjala District, Punjab.2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Crime No. 30 of 2010, where the offences alleged, going by Annexure A First Information Report, are under Sections 65 and 66(1) and (2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. After hearing all the counsel and the learned Additional Advocate General of the State of Punjab, it is fairly clear that the offences alleged against the accused include the offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code as well.3. In the Bail Application, the offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code were not mentioned. When the Bail Application came up for admission, the undertaking made by the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for respondents 1 and 3 ...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2018 (SC)

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.494 OF2012JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) WITH TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.151 OF2013TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.152 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.833 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.829 OF2013TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.1797 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.932 OF2013TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.1796 OF2013CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.144 OF2014WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.494 OF2012IN TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.313 OF2014TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.312 OF2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.2524 OF2014WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.37 OF2015Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 1 of 567 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.220 OF2015CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.674 OF2015WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.829 OF2013TRANSFERRED PETITION (CIVIL) No.921 OF2015CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.470 OF2015WRIT...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2013 (HC)

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Dharmadhikari, J. 1 RULE. 2 The Respondents waive service. By consent of parties, heard forthwith. 3 By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Petitioner is seeking quashing of CR No.3212/2011 registered with the Cyber Crime Cell, Crime Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This Company is incorporated and registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged in the business of printing and publishing news papers in the States of Maharashtra and Goa. The Company has also Website, therefore, publications have wide circulation throughout India and abroad. One Abhijeet Prataprao Pawar is Director on the Board of Directors of the said Company. One Leelatai Parulekar is also a Director a...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2019 (SC)

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. A Kalaimani

Court : Supreme Court of India

Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.6190-6201 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 14206-14217 of 2019) THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Versus A. KALAIMANI & ORS. .... Appellant(s) . Respondent (s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted. The Teachers Recruitment Board (hereinafter referred 1. to as the Board) issued a notification on 28.07.2017 inviting applications for selection to the posts of Lecturers in Government Polytechnic Colleges in the State of Tamil Nadu for the year 2017-2018. 1058 vacancies were notified and 1,70,366 applications were received. A written examination was conducted on 16.09.2017 in which 1,33,567 candidates appeared. The written examination was of objective type. A2 printed book was given to the candidates in the 1 examination hall. The printed book is known as Optical Mark Recognition (OMR) sheet. After completion of the written examination, the OMR sheets were scanned in the office of the Board. Th...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2024 (SC)

Ekene Godwin Vs. State Of Tamilnadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2024INSC229CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S).1664-1665 OF2024(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (CRIMINAL) NO(S).13406-13407/2023) EKENE GODWIN & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J1 Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent State.2. The appellants are being prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 66, read with Sections 43(J) and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The charge sheet has been filed, and the trial has proceeded. By the impugned order, the High Court rejected the appellants application for regular bail.3. During the hearing on an earlier date, we were informed that the Trial Court recorded the examination-in-chief of 12 prosecution witnesses (PW-1 to PW-12) one after the other on different dates without...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2023 (SC)

Rana Ayyub Vs. Directorate Of Enforcement

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.12 OF2023RANA AYYUB PETITIONER VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR RESPONDENT JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J.1. Challenging a summoning order issued by the Court of the Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, CBI Court No.1, Ghaziabad, on a complaint lodged by the respondent under Section 45 read with Section 44 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 20021, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.2. We have heard Ms. Vrinda Grover, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General of India for the respondent. 1 For short, PMLA or the Act, as the case may be. 13. It is the case of the petitioner that during the pandemic, she initiated crowdfunding campaign through an online crowdfunding platform named Ketto and ran three campaigns from April 2020 to September 2021. In co...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2016 (HC)

Ajith Kumar, Rep. By his father, Sivagangai District and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

(Prayers in Crl.O.P.(MD)1785/2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Juvenile Justice Board, Sivagangai to accept the surrender of the petitioner in connection with the Crime No.644 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and to consider and pass orders in the bail application on the same day on surrender. Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD)1941/2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Thoothukudi to consider the petitioner's bail application and dispose of the bail application on the same day, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Thoothukudi in Crime No.25 of 2016 on the file of the respondent. Crl.O.P.(MD)2073/2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Juvenile Justice Board, Tuticorin to accept the surrender of the petitioner and consider the bail application on merits on the da...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Manish Kumar. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Gujarat

1. The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order impugned dated 14.01.2011 passed by the Sessions Judge, Hazaribag in Criminal Appeal No.164 of 2010 by which the prayer for bail made by the petitioner-juvenile was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board, Hazaribag on 09.12.2010 was affirmed in Rajrappa P.S. Case No. 70 of 2010, corresponding to G.R.No. 2980 of 2010 and the appeal was dismissed. The petitioner was arrested but he was declared juvenile after determination of his age by the Juvenile Justice Board on 18.12.2010. The F.I.R. was lodged against as many as 11 named accused persons including the petitioner-juvenile for the alleged offence under Sections 376/354/306/509/511 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code as also under Sections 66A/66B/67A/67B and 72 of the the Information and Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. Learned Counsel Mr. Nilesh Kumar submitted that ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 2021 (HC)

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4676 OF2020AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4712 OF2020IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4676 OF2020BETWEEN:1. SRI. KUNAL BAHL CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF M/S JASPER INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, 238 1ST FLOOR, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110020 2. SRI. ROHIT KUMAR BANSAL CHIEF OPERATIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF M/S JASPER INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED238 1ST FLOOR, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110020 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.C.V. NAGESH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SANJANTHI SAJAN POOVAYYA, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY DRUGS INSPECTOR (INTELLIGENCE)-2 REGIONAL OFFICE, MYSORE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DRUGS CONTROLLER-CA-08 2ND PHASE, 4TH STAGE VIJAYANAGAR, MYSURU-570032 ... RESPONDENT (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, HCGP) Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 2 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 THIS CRIMI...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 2021 (HC)

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 1 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4676 OF2020AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4712 OF2020IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4676 OF2020BETWEEN:1. SRI. KUNAL BAHL CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF M/S JASPER INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, 238 1ST FLOOR, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110020 2. SRI. ROHIT KUMAR BANSAL CHIEF OPERATIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF M/S JASPER INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED238 1ST FLOOR, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110020 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI.C.V. NAGESH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SANJANTHI SAJAN POOVAYYA, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY DRUGS INSPECTOR (INTELLIGENCE)-2 REGIONAL OFFICE, MYSORE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DRUGS CONTROLLER-CA-08 2ND PHASE, 4TH STAGE VIJAYANAGAR, MYSURU-570032 ... RESPONDENT (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, HCGP) Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 2 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 THIS CRIMI...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //