Information Processing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: information processing Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 633 results (0.211 seconds)O.R.G. Systems, Baroda Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-21-1998
Reported in: AIR1998SC2662; 1998(61)ECC443; 1998(102)ELT3(SC); (1999)1GLR558; JT1998(5)SC92; 1998(4)SCALE208; (1998)6SCC56; [1998]3SCR820
..... act 1967 where a computer is defined as including any electronic or similar device having information processing capabilities and a computer programme is defined to mean a set of instructions expressed in ..... that buyers made between the computer and the software 10 in the appeals of wipro information technology limited and psi data systems limited the charges for installation of the computer and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDy. Commercial Tax Officer and anr. Vs. M. Velmurugan
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-15-1998
Reported in: JT1999(10)SC305; (1999)1SCC296
..... liners and brake pads licensed products by licensee licensor agreed to disclose relevant secret processes formula and information to licensee licensee required to import buy raw material and capital goods from licensor .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalyan Kumar Das Vs. the State of West Bengal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-13-1998
Reported in: (1998)2CALLT163(HC),1998(2)CHN136
..... magistratedecides to take cognizance of the offence and to issue process the informant is not prejudicially affected nor is the injured or in ..... not inclined to take cognizance of the offence and issue process the informant must be given an opportunity of being heard so that ..... not inclined to take cognizance of the offence and issue process the informant must be given an opportunity of being heard so .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChelliah Vs. Yesuvadial
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)ALT(Cri)47; 1999CriLJ1013
..... 2 i the magistrate is not inclined to take cognizance of the offence and issue process the informant must be given an opportunity of being heard so that he can make his ..... when the magistrate decides to take cognizance of the offence and to issue process the complainant or the informant is not prejudicially affected but if the magistrate decides to drop the proceedings .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole Vs. Scott
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-30-1998
..... v janis supra at 455 n 29 would severely disrupt the traditionally informal administrative process of parole revocation the marginal deterrence of unreasonable searches and seizures is ..... brewer supra at 483 recognizing that states have an overwhelming interest in maintaining informal administrative parole revocation procedures such a transformation ultimately might disadvantage parolees because in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Leela Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-18-1998
Reported in: 1999CriLJ1807
..... these two situations the magistrate decides to take cognizance of the offence and to issue process the informant is not prejudicially affected nor is the injured or in case of death any relative ..... police department and the investigating officers in all cases of criminal offences shall be specifically informed that it is their personal responsibility for which they will be held personally accountable .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhatter'S Bhatter And Company Vs. I.C.T./Bureau Of Investigation
Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal
Decided on: Jul-15-1998
Reported in: (2000)120STC470Tribunal
..... to the notice of a team of inspectors for conducting an enquiry and processing it into intelligence on processing the information the inspectors concerned found elements of truth in the allegation and decided ..... from the records available before us whether the assessing authority was at any earlier time informed by the dealer about his having purchased gold ornaments or had detected any such purchase .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Combustion Engineering Company Inc.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-23-1998
Reported in: [1999]240ITR41(Mad)
..... as below since the royalty is received for supply of know how designs drawings information regarding secret processes etc expenditure to be allowed as a deduction would have to relate to paper ..... work courier and corresponding salaries of staff etc mainly because the information is already developed and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamesh Kumar Rajaymohan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-06-1998
Reported in: AIR1999Bom86; 1998(4)ALLMR659; 1998(3)BomCR702; 1998(3)MhLj122
..... 3 on 29 9 1996 a notification was published in the local news paper informing that the process of admission would commence from 20 9 1996 and on 30 9 1996 state .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Board of Direct Taxes and ors. New Delhi Vs. Oberoi Hotels (In ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-30-1998
Reported in: 1998IVAD(SC)411; AIR1998SC1666; (1998)146CTR(SC)222; [1998]231ITR148(SC); JT1998(2)SC717; 1998(2)SCALE516; (1998)4SCC552; [1998]2SCR501
..... outside india of any patent invention model design secret formula or process or similar property right or information concerning industrial commercial or scientific knowledge experience or skill made ..... indian assessee of any patent invention model design secret formula or process or similar property right or information concerning industrial commercial or scientific knowledge experience or skill of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial